Hello, Pooja502, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Tentrr, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Otterathome ( talk) 21:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tentrr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Otterathome ( talk) 21:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Tentrr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo ( talk) 02:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Josve05a was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tentrr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

( t)  Josve05a ( c) 04:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello! Pooja502, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ( t)  Josve05a ( c) 04:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. My comments refer to your most recent draft. I deleted your article because

• it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company organisation claims or interviewing its management. Although you gave some references, they were clearly not all independent third party sources, including the company website, an interview with Michael D’Agostino and so on.
• I can't see any evidence to show why it meets the notability criteria linked above. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits, but all we have is a sales pitch. You don't even say where you offices are, or even what country you are in, although from the context it's presumably the US. From what we are told this could be a couple of people working out of their home, which definitely wouldn't meet our criteria. It also appears to be quite local in scope, and is only a couple of years old new, so may not be notable.
• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced or inadequately source claims presented as fact include: bespoke, secluded and fully-equipped campsites... acres of private property... spacious, hand-sewn canvas tent... “I wish I could camp there.”... secure and trusted. — Also "How it works" is telling people how to book, which isn't encyclopaedic information, but is a sales pitch, also see " how to"
• I see you have tried twice to write about this company, but have virtually no other edits. If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. In particular, if you work directly or indirectly for the company, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pooja502. The template {{ Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pooja502|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Since the article was deleted from draft space, if I restored, it would have to be as an edited version. Before I do so,

• please check that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above and that you can add content, such as financials, to support that notability, backed by proper independent third party sources.
• Read this important guidance.
• Reply to the COI request above.

Alternatively you could write from scratch following " Your first article", although you will still need to reply to the COI query.

Please let me know if and how you wish to proceed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply