Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Relationship between the Romanian Orthodox Church and the Iron Guard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aromanian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 07:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
(Redacted) Do you want to join the Intelligence task force, This is an invitation. Thanks Danielbughi999 ( talk) 02:19, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Right. Plinul cel tanar ( talk) 14:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Relationship between the Romanian Orthodox Church and the Iron Guard you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jens Lallensack --
Jens Lallensack (
talk)
21:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
Relationship between the Romanian Orthodox Church and the Iron Guard you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Relationship between the Romanian Orthodox Church and the Iron Guard for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jens Lallensack --
Jens Lallensack (
talk)
20:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
Relationship between the Romanian Orthodox Church and the Iron Guard you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Relationship between the Romanian Orthodox Church and the Iron Guard for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jens Lallensack --
Jens Lallensack (
talk)
21:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Visarion Puiu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicolae Macici, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RFI.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Good evening!
I'm talking about your in Historical names of Transylvania. Paliga and Vinereanu are part of the few challengers of the Hungarian origin theory in Romania, as far as I know, the only notable in modern linguistics/historiography, and quite important for that reason. So why not include them in the Romanian view section? Unreliable source doesn't rule out someone from Wikipedia, or does it? Gyalu22 ( talk) 19:35, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
There are people who are notable enough to have articles included in Wikipedia solely on the basis of their advocacy of fringe beliefs. Notability can be determined by considering whether there are enough reliable and independent sources that discuss the person in a serious and extensive manner,
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Michael the Brave has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 01:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)