![]() | This user is a participant in WikiProject Pakistan. |
Your recent contributions at Taha Malik appear to show that you are engaged in edit warring; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not override another editor's contributions. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Praxidicae ( talk) 17:13, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Phipperz reported by User:Ravensfire (Result: ). Thank you.
Ravensfire (
talk)
17:54, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Ravensfire is the one Edit-warring. He refuses to discuss or look at the prior discussion under the Talk page. What can one do? He simply makes edits without justifying properly or looking at prior discussion after the article was reviewed.
I am all about consensus. And I welcome contributions and working together. But you must also consider the Talk page and the discussions within it before making rash judgements and editing/cutting away. Anyway, have a nice day.
Then help me out rather than reporting and being antagonistic. Discuss in Talk before, and let someone else chime in. Wikipedia recommends that we talk and discuss before making changes over and over again.
I'm sorry; I have been very civil with you. But you made edits first and then went to the talk page, where other editors had discussed with me. Then you put on unnecessary badges on the page after the article was reviewed and appropriate badges are on it about living bio, etc. I have cooperated with other editors on that. Now the page is protected as a result of you reporting me. Thanks. Anyway, take care and be good. I wish you well. Phipperz ( talk) 23:54, 21 September 2019 (UTC)