Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jacrosse. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jacrosse/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jacrosse/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, -- Tony Sidaway 13:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Thames- thanks a lot for your support on my recent, (barely) successful rfa. Please feel free to leave me any comments or criticisms on my talk page! -- He: ah? 22:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Thames, I changed anarchy to anarchy in the World order page, and you reverted the edit. I'll certainly accept that Anarchism might not be the best fit - perhaps Anomie? - but as anarchy (word) redirects to the disambigaution page Anarchy, I thought it best to remove what is in effect a link to a disambiguation page. I certainly have no intention of edit warring over this and haven't reverted. However, I did think that wiki style guidlines discouraged links to disambiguation pages. If you believe that ths current wikilink best suits the article, I'll let it be. Cheers, Colonel Tom 03:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- Nv8200p talk 20:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to tell you that a new page for Great Powers is going to be created in the future. This page is meant to be a summary of Superpower, Major power, Regional power and Potential Superpowers, which means that the page should detail exactly when the United States became a Superpower as opposed to Great power. Nobleeagle (Talk) 02:17, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks for your support of my RFA, which passed narrowly. I will try to be worthy of your trust. Regards, Kaisershatner 20:22, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Ok, will do. Esaborio 22:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I must have been in a hurry and didn't notice... Esaborio 18:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thames wrote:
Here's the page I was referring to: Wikipedia:Avoid peacock terms. All the best. — thames 23:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Re: authorlink = Walter Laqueur
didn't know that. Travb 19:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
I don't know if you just read the anecdote about the origin of the term or the whole talk page. If you did read the whole talk page you would see that I added references from the Canadian Encyclopaedia, the Government of Canada website, and two published books. I also asked that no countries be added to the "list" without similar research, which someone did, so we added Australia to the list. I especially invite you to read about the book on South African's potential Middle Power status, which goes into the theory of what a Middle Power is. Kevlar67 21:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for voting at my RFA. Even though you did not vote for me, your counsel was appreciated. In the next few months, I intend to work on expanding my involvement in other namespaces and try a few different subjects than in the past. - CTSWyneken Talk |
Some time ago you expressed reservations about a part of Well-Tempered Clavier which I wrote - formatting and 'Wikisyntax'. I still am not, experienced enough here to know just what you meant. Can you explain? -- Tdent 16:44, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed that you appeared in the edit history of the justification (theology) article. I recently made major changes to the article in an effort to move it to NPOV. If you have any suggestions for improvement (style, content, whatever), please leave a comment on the talk page for that article. The goal is to get the article to the point that the POV and cleanup templates can be removed.
Thanks, -- jrcagle 20:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
If you were to nominate this awful article for AfD as OR, you could count on my unflinching support. Albrecht 21:16, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Please contact me as soon as possible.-- BradPatrick 18:43, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for all your great work. Danny 01:49, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the vote in my RfA! It did not gain consensus, but I'm glad I accepted the nomination. - Amgine 16:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
This case has been closed. The final decision is in the case page at the link above.
For the Arbitration Committee. -- Tony Sidaway 14:13, 18 May 2006 (UTC)