Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with links to healtheconomics.com (
*|
search current).
Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. Since Wikipedia uses
Nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Femto
15:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Electronic health record.
Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you.
Ryanjo
02:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue
spamming, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
PuerExMachina (
talk •
contribs).
- While this is quite some spam, let's keep in mind that users should have a chance to react to the old warnings before a next-level warning is issued (there weren't any edits since). Anyone feel free to issue their own level-independent uw-spam4im though. Femto 12:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{ prod}}" template to the article Health outcomes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{ prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe ( Talk) 16:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)