![]() |
Hi Panda2018 0! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC) |
Hello Panda2018 0, please use uppercase and lowercase letters. Regards -- Serols ( talk) 07:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from removing tags again like how you did on LGBT rights in Greece. They are not added without reason; the sections really could see expansion with any possible information. If you are not interested to contribute positively to it, then leave it alone. -- đ§đ» SilentResident đ§đ» ( talk âïž | contribs đ) 01:50, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
LGBT rights in Illinois, but you didn't provide a source. Iâve removed it for now, but if youâd like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Jim1138 (
talk)
17:11, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Zachary Schr. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
FiberTech (
talk)
17:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editingâespecially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workâwhether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each timeâcounts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringâeven if you don't violate the three-revert ruleâshould your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MarnetteD| Talk 17:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at LGBT rights by country or territory shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editingâespecially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workâwhether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each timeâcounts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringâeven if you don't violate the three-revert ruleâshould your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. FiberTech ( talk) 18:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. It seems that you may have added
public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as
LGBT rights in the District of Columbia. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia
guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at
Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an
attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. â
Diannaa đ (
talk)
13:18, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources, as you did with
this edit to
LGBT rights in India. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Lakeside Out!-
LakesideMiners
Click Here To Talk To Me!
16:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi An update Concerning LGBT rights in Fiji Ahead of elections Different parties were asked ablut their stance about same sex marriage Some resonded some not Some respobded positively most responded negatively http://www.fijitimes.com/same-sex-marriage-issue/ AdamPrideTN ( talk) 21:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Concerning Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas I'm sure there are important updates needeed as the national bill in and the important updates in the constutuition and referendum in Cuba I think also updates to public opinion and future and current legislation is needed Thank you and that in Venezuela they are discussing it in the new draft constitution in Venezuela either by the end of 2018 or 2019 according to sources I would refer ylu to all respective recognition or lgbt rights pages of the countries Here are sources for Venezuela important update maybe you can added into its pages Plus cuba president backing same sex marriage Im new here and still learning so its better that the edit comes from you Thank you
http://www.el-nacional.com/noticias/politica/nueva-constitucion-podria-legalizar-matrimonio-gay-venezuela_251900 AdamPrideTN ( talk) 21:17, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Concerning Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe Now that unfortunately the civil union bill in Slovakia have been defeated Should slovakia still be put in future legislation section Or what do you think? AdamPrideTN ( talk) 21:21, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Please
assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. In your edit summaries, when you reverted several changes I made that I explained clearly in terms of Wikipedia guidelines against editorializing in articles and that I obviously made in good faith, you described my changes as vandalism. This doesn't fly.
Largoplazo (
talk)
22:04, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Sharing with you the comments I left for User:Xylo kai Gyali explaining the reason for my removals:
I've left the paragraph text in place in articles where it's serving as context for activity within the country that is a consequence of the IACHR ruling, such as when a lawsuit has been filed that cites that ruling as its legal basis. In other cases, where the ruling is mentioned without any discussion of actions in the country that have resulted from it, it's only serving an editorial function, as if to say "LGBT people don't have such-and-such rights in this country, but the IACHR ruling says they should have them". The articles rightly deal with what LGBT rights are, and on activities in each respective country related to the pursuit or granting or revocation of rights in that country, but it isn't appropriate for Wikipedia to state what they're supposed to be.
Precedent for this is a similar set of removals of language in articles on LGBT rights in various African countries. AfricaTanz had added boilerplate language about an international agreement that was said to be binding on all those countries, without mentioning any actual impact the ruling had on any of those countries. After a lengthy feud, the removal of the content was sustained. Largoplazo ( talk) 22:20, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Previous pertinent discussions, relating to a similar situation vis-a-vis African countries:
Largoplazo ( talk) 23:52, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Largoplazo ( talk) 11:19, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
@ Panda2018 0: Last chance: I've explained why I removed the material, and you've refused to discuss it. The edit summary on your latest reversions, "Please do not remove important information", indicates a complete refusal to WP:LISTEN, and takes the form of a plea to let the material be there just because you want it there, without any sense of obligation on your part to follow Wikipedia guidelines. Any more reversions and we're going to the administrator's noticeboard, which may lead to you being blocked. Largoplazo ( talk) 18:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
For crying out loud: A couple of your edit summaries read "you remove this content explanation again I will report you". Without explanation?????? You mean, besides all of the above??? Largoplazo ( talk) 18:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Another of your edit summaries reads "you remove this content explanation again I will report you". When you report a dispute, do you know what the first question is? It's "Did you discuss it and try to come to a resolution with the other party(ies)?" Well, you've refused to discuss, so there goes that. Largoplazo ( talk) 18:29, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
We don't need duplicate information on each individual article. You could maybe add it to LGBT rights by country or territory near the top. â BrandonXLF (t@lk) 18:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
With this edit you changed "Virginia's hate crime laws" to "Virginia's hate crime law" despite the fact that the source mentions three laws. I won't fuss about "protections" which I find clumsy but is technically correct, but if the source discusses laws plural, the text must reflect that. Doug Weller talk 18:25, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Stop deleting prude map pics from pages they are important and wonderful Who said they are unnecessary People who put it before you in all of these did it for a reason okay Please stop it AdamPrideTN ( talk) 23:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi i understand but these maps are for countries that have protections and did good to lgbt protections For example u can not do it in my shithole country or in afghanistan or in nigeria or kenya since they offer nothing Im not vandalising u know Thx
peace â Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamPrideTN ( talk âą contribs) 10:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks Fls81245 ( talk) 08:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, Panda2018 0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The LGBT Barnstar | |
I know I vexed you with our original encounter, but I want you to know that I really appreciate your steady flow of contributions to Wikipedia concerning LGBT conditions worldwide. Largoplazo ( talk) 15:55, 1 January 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
EkniBhattaKhas (
talk) 16:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC) . I noticed that you recently removed content without explaining why. You need to describe why you have removed an important conent.
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
EkniBhattaKhas (
talk)
16:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
EkniBhattaKhas ( talk) 16:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT rights in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audiencia ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ ⹠Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing.
I am giving you a warning over reverting editing I made on LGBT rights in India and Template:LGBT_rights_table_Asia. I have attached two citations that make it clear the law in Sri Lanka is varyingly decriminalized, whereas the anti-discrimination law does not exist in India as the BBC mentions that activists still want to see such a law.
Hindianu (
talk)
19:47, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
You still do not understand, do you? India has no anti-discrimination laws that include sexual orientation, that is true. HOWEVER, the Supreme Court has ruled that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is unconstitutional. This is supported by all the references I added plus your own. LGBT activists want an explicit anti-discrimination law, to ensure that there are no loopholes. See Case law. Panda2018 0 ( talk) 12:34, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
As for Sri Lanka, I still fail to understand how it is ambiguous. Their anti-gay law is still there, it has not been overturned or repealed. It is simply not enforced. Why should Sri Lanka be treated any differently to Bhutan to other countries where the laws are not enforced? Plus your own sources state that the police occasionally still use the law to harrass and arbitrarily detain LGBT people. Panda2018 0 ( talk) 12:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
@ Hindianu: A good faith disagreement on facts and substance and how to present them isn't vandalism. Both of you, though, are engaged in edit warring, and you may have both crossed over the WP:3RR threshold and are vulnerable to being blocked. Please take the discussion to the article's talk page, where Hindianu got it rolling, and stop editing the article until a consensus is reached, even if you need to seek dispute resolution to get there. Largoplazo ( talk) 16:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
You have been citing this in edit summaries while making edits in direct opposition to it. Please read the third example pairs there and then go self-revert. -- JBL ( talk) 14:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! â kwami ( talk) 04:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Could you present your evidence in the NL thread on the SSM talk page? I have two sources that say there will be SSM in NL once the legislature modifies the code to comply w the SC ruling. Two others state that NL has SSM. I don't know which is correct. Have there been any marriages? â kwami ( talk) 22:24, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Concerning the names of media and publications, they are not repeated but are actually two different books. One is just a Nepal Bhasa book while the other is trilingual book. Their news sources are different. Please also refer to references before making edits. â Preceding unsigned comment added by BDSnepal ( talk âą contribs) 12:57, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
According to the section "Non-equal treatment of married couples" in our article, registered SSM conducted elsewhere in the kingdom are not treated as marriage, unlike Israel -- indeed, from our description, it would appear that they are accorded less rights than registered SSM in Italy. Can you provide any RS's that such SSM are treated as full marriage in Aruba? Either one of us could then correct the misinformation in Same-sex marriage in Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten. â kwami ( talk) 05:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello I was planning to create a Timeline of LGBT history in Mexico (which i did now) u can find it in the history section that is still there I was going to leave the history of precolumbian and moved to the history part that there is now And move the timeline section to a new timeline page (I hope its clear) A pity now that there is some editor who erased all the first history part containing timeline And now its blocked and i cannot find it to move it to the new intended article of timeline of LGBT History in Mexico Any idea how can that valuable content of the first removed history can be found and moved to the new page Any help please Thank you AdamPrideTN ( talk) 14:14, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Same-sex marriage in the Pitcairn Islands does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences â
Editing â
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Me-123567-Me (
talk)
03:52, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to let you know that a few users are vandalizing the article same-sex marriage. They insist to remove sourced researches that have found that children to same-sex couples grow just as well or even better than children to other couples. They claim that these researches are not sourced, even though they are perfectly sourced. They probably do this because these professional scientific researches do not conform to their anti-LGBT agenda. I would highly appreciate it if you could participate in the talk page. We must not allow anti-LGBT bias in this important article. Thank you! Guycn2 · â 22:26, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT rights in Costa Rica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Citizens' Action Party ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ ⹠Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:46, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for tailoring the language in the Terminology section at LGBT rights in Nepalââ to cover terms specific to understanding the legal environment. Largoplazo ( talk) 14:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the refs. The second one has the key wording "since January 2016 numerous partnerships have been registered based on the act", which, based on RS, trumps my more recent correspondence (feb 2019) with a human-rights group that people are still not free to get CUs. The whole situation's so confused that, like Armenia and many of the tribal jurisdictions in the US, we're probably going to have to wing it for a while. â kwami ( talk) 22:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
https://ilga.org/state-sponsored-homophobia-report
Hi the latest 2019 ilga report is very important and highly big and informative Many lgbt country pages in africa asia and (even americas) need to be updated urhently Take ur time and check and hope u can update the countries Some unapdated even from 2011
There is also the blog erasing 76 Like this just write the name of country and erasing 76 in google like that
Also there is The U.S. Department of State's 2019 Human Rights Report
I would do it happily but i'm focusing much on the translating English LGBT content pages into Arabic all the time and can't much
Thx good luck (no pressure of course, just a suggestion) AdamPrideTN ( talk) 08:33, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
http://www.equalityontrial.com/2019/06/25/625-open-thread/#idc-container
https://mobile.twitter.com/lgbtmarriage
https://m.facebook.com/nelfa.aisbl/
Are one of the best sites woth sources that provides daily updates about lgbt rights (some that go unedited for weeks)
I would advice you to check them from time to time for updates
I would do what i can happily but i'm focusing much on the translating English LGBT content pages into Arabic all the time and can't much
Thx good luck (no pressure of course, just a suggestion) AdamPrideTN ( talk) 08:56, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Panda2018 0. If you have sources for the factual changes you made, please provide them. Meanwhile I'm reverting to what is supported by the sources we do have. â kwami ( talk) 12:07, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
You need to read the sources before changing factual statements. When a tribe does not conduct marriage, and you say they do, or they accept SSM, and you say they don't, that's a bit ridiculous. Especially when you revert me when I correct your errors. If you were an IP I would assume you were a vandal and have you blocked. Don't edit until you know what you're doing. â kwami ( talk) 12:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Yes, they do. (Well, three of them do.) But they also accept state marriage. Which means that they accept SSM. "Yes/No" is just gobbledygook. If you want to create another icon, equivalent to purple on the map, that's fine. But if someone checks the table to see whether s.o. accepts SSM or not, and they can't tell your edit doesn't tell them anything, then that's not useful as a reference tool. â kwami ( talk) 13:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
In the case of Eastern Cherokee, no-one can marry on the reservation. Well, they can have a wedding, but that's not a legal marriage. So it's more like not allowing gay people into your town hall.
As for Hopi, I called the court and asked. Of course, they may be wrong about their own law. The code you point to specifies that traditional marriages are valid (as historically there's been attempts to invalidate traditional marriages on many res). But it doesn't define marriage other than that. â kwami ( talk) 13:21, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
But you're right, we could definitely use an icon for off-res only SSM. Problem is, in many cases we simply don't know. We know that a res accepts state marriages, but not whether there's been a ruling on whether SSM is acceptable under tribal law. So going this route would only add lots of question marks to the table. Easier to specify that 'yes' means either on-res or per the state. â kwami ( talk) 13:24, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for your edits to marriage equality articles. Just stay out of edit wars and you'll be fine. Bearian ( talk) 21:08, 4 September 2019 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Recognition of same-sex unions in Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue and White ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:48, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT rights in Colombia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Corazón Abierto ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Panda2018 0, I noticed that you've converted the "External links" sections of several articles from the usual "square brackets" style of linking to use "cite web" templates. Your efforts to improve these articles are welcome and appreciated. However, I'd like to ask you to stop converting section link styles in this way, and to put the ones you've changed back to the original style.
The current practice for link syntax in External links sections is described in the Manual of Style: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking § External links section. The "cite web" template is not designed for use in External links sections. It's not strictly prohibited, and where there is good reason, in rare cases it may be used, but in general the standard method is preferred. The description accompanying an external link should give readers "a good summary of the site's contents, and the reasons why this specific website is relevant to the article in question." Using only the title, as is the case with "cite web" templates, doesn't provide this. This is explained in Wikipedia:External links § External links section. The "cite web" template should only be used with caution in External links sections; it's not appropriate for most links. At the moment, there's no template available specifically for external links.
Also, in general, when there are multiple optional styles under the Manual of Style guidelines, even when they are equally acceptable (which is not the case here), the usual practice is to maintain the existing style in an article and not to make wholesale conversions between them. If there is some good reason to do so, normally consensus should be sought on the talk page before making such a conversion. This is described in Wikipedia:Manual of Style § Retaining existing styles. One exception to this is the conversion of citations that use bare URLs into full citations, often using "cite" templates. This is generally considered helpful, and it might seem that the same applies to external links, but it's not the case here. Please let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your understanding. -- IamNotU ( talk) 02:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to LGBT rights in Louisiana does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences â
Editing â
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Please explain what you are doing. Thank you.
Drmies (
talk)
22:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
DEFCON5. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Recognition of same-sex unions in India without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
defcon5 (
talk)
17:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Same-sex marriage in the Falkland Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Edwards.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Panda2018 0,
Your template created a red link category, Category:Tahitian language. According to WP:REDNO, red link categories either have to be removed from a page or a category created. Could you do one of these alternatives? Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
I have nominated Same-sex marriage in Spain for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ( t · c) buidhe 04:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Same-sex marriage in Belgium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congregation.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Recognition of same-sex unions in China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Visa.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to
Same-sex marriage in Nunavut has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or imagesâyou must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. â
Diannaa (
talk)
02:24, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Same-sex marriage in Massachusetts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Recognition of same-sex unions in Namibia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Race.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:IPA-new has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk)
01:35, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Template:IPA-ts has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk)
01:35, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Template:IPA-ve has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk)
01:35, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
So, of the countries that have SSM, which have marriage equality (I believe the US does) and which have lesser rights (like Ecuador)? â kwami ( talk) 04:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, but this isn't supposed to be fiction. A foreign court is irrelevant if the country decides not to abide by their rulings -- otherwise we'd need to include nearly all of Latin America as having SSM. If Romania enforces the ruling, or announces that they will, then we can include them.
I don't mind the fix to Bermuda. You can make a separate edit for that. â kwami ( talk) 11:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of openly LGBT heads of state and government, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi Panda. I thanked you for your edit on Winnebago, but my browser no longer shows that I thanked you. So I'm curious: did you see the thanks, or did it fail to go through somehow? â kwami ( talk) 20:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello Panda2018 0. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Same-sex marriage in Slovenia, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Please tag this under WP:G6 and provide a reason for the move. Thank you. BangJan1999 23:02, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
BangJan1999, Hi! Just had a read through the proper procedures on when to delete redirects when they block page moves. "If it has a minor page history, generally meaning it only existed as a redirect, and was never a duplicate article, never had content that was cut and pasted to the present title, nor merged there, it may simply be deleted." I believe in this case, the article Same-sex marriage in Slovenia has a minor page history, and should be deleted. This would make way for Recognition of same-sex unions in Slovenia to be moved to the aforementioned title to reflect the recent legalisation of same-sex marriage in that country. Panda2018 0 ( talk) 23:10, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Same-sex marriage in Minnesota, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dakota.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:42, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Your edit to
Same-sex marriage in Arizona has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or imagesâyou must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. â
Diannaa (
talk)
11:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Panda2018 0, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Firefangledfeathers, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nancy Waters, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Waters.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Firefangledfeathers}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 04:40, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nancy Waters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Waters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For all the work you do related to LGBT rights. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 22:52, 6 November 2022 (UTC) |
Hi Panda,
The MOS suggests bolding the title of an article when it first appears in the lead, but that's when it's somethnig that occurs naturally in the text. Phrasal titles and disambiguating parentheticals do not need to be repeated in the lead, and they shouldn't be when doing so would distort the prose. â kwami ( talk) 20:59, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editingâespecially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workâwhether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each timeâcounts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringâeven if you do not violate the three-revert ruleâshould your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Izzy Moony Hi new friend! 10:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
Lemonaka (
talk)
10:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Same-sex marriage in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Volpe.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Same-sex marriage in Canada. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. â Joeyconnick ( talk) 23:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
I notice that you have twice reverted significant edits I made to the page Same-sex marriage in Cuba. I acknowledge issues with my edits and still feel an edit is needed to that page. I do not wish to engage in an edit war with you, so I have initiated the following discussion on the article's talk page and invite you to take part: "the first of the former Eastern Bloc (except East Germany and Slovenia)" Thisisnotatest ( talk) 06:38, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Recognition of same-sex unions in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Governor of Punjab.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Recognition of same-sex unions in India, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 15:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Recognition of same-sex unions in India, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 15:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)