![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
I am doing history merges to fix some very old cut and paste moves so that everyone can get credit for what they wrote in the article history. The way I do it gums up watchlists but minimises page deletions to keep the servers happy. I'm not going totally rogue, yet. :-) Graham 87 07:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Well - i'm going to disengage completely, i've had personal problems with User:Tillman which may influence my cool.
I just find it curious that you've taken a stand in an editwar with WP:BLP concerns that was started by a User:scibaby socket. And on top of that taken the stand that insertion of contentious information should stand - instead of being discussed first.
But oh well - such is life. -- Kim D. Petersen ( talk) 17:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for your advice on page titles.
Please can you comment on my proposed short article on my user page?
Thank you Bobman999 ( talk) 12:54, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
I have made a proposal on the talk page for 'arab-israeli conflict' to insert my section into the article. Unfortunately, that article's neutrality is under dispute, and the talk page appears to have been subjected to trolling.
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Bob
Bobman999 ( talk) 09:52, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Oren0, I notice that you had a hard time to communicate with the user in question. If you leave your input to WP:ANI, I would really appreciate your help. Thanks.-- Caspian blue ( talk) 17:20, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you so much for the snarky reminder of the clearly obvious! It's pretty much what I'd expect from an anti-science POV pusher. Oddly enough, I see folks other than myself also reverting you - hmm indeed. -- Badger Drink ( talk) 17:29, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
They're at it again... could you take a look at the situation? Thanks. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 18:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
I thought you might be interested in this on WP:ANI:
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Continued_baiting_and_harassment_by_User:GoRight.
I only mention it in case you haven't seen it and are interested. If you already noticed it then excuse the interruption. -- GoRight ( talk) 00:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I have finished revising my comment at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/GoRight#Ouside View by Abd. I promised that I would notify those who endorsed my comment so they would have an opportunity to revise their comments. Thanks. -- Abd ( talk) 03:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me get unblocked. :) Unknown the Hedgehog 20:05, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Could you remove the whole "f*** you" bit? I can't since it's (obviously) a protected page. Ironho lds 06:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I better study coding and syntax before I touch another page again... I could not see such an obvious mess up...!!! Thanks again and Regds, Fredricfanthome ( talk) 06:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
[4]?
Thanks! If I come across a page like that again, what template do I tag the page with? Thanks Again :) Take Care and Have a Great Week Ahead... NeutralHomer • Talk 05:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your help! I seem to understand what went wrong. I'm comencing the process of building up a unified account in order to solve all tweaks. Thanks again! The Ogre ( talk) 17:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
It shouldn't, but I was blocked before for reverting vandalism, and have a feeling I would be reported again, and I just don't want the hassle. Thanks though. Arzel ( talk) 04:39, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
I noticed you wheel-warred the protecting admin. Did you read the discussion on the talk page, or discuss with the protecting admin? Kelly hi! 21:29, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
One of the arbitrators has asked that every admin who is arguably involved in the events at Sarah Palin be notified of an arbitration case covering it. I therefore draw your attention to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#MZMcBride. GRBerry 18:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
The Sarah Palin wheel war arbitration case, on which you have commented, is now open.
For the Arbitration Committee, Anthøny ✉ 21:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
No, they are not relevant since those pages are structured in an entirely different way, especially Clinton. Did you even look at that before reverting? I sincerely hope you're not actually claiming they are relevant based only on Palin's, Bush's and Clinton's commonality of being involved in U.S. politics. user: Everyme 20:51, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi there again. When you have some time, can you drop by the Talk page of the Michael Crichton's State of Fear article. May be you can give us a hand. Read the more recent discussions (last two weeks). See you around.-- Mariordo ( talk) 23:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, this is just to let you know that today I created the new article An Appeal to Reason: A Cool Look at Global Warming. I though you might be interested in collaborating to improve it (the criticism section is still missing) or just to follow it up.-- Mariordo ( talk) 21:32, 27 September 2008 (UTC)