![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 105 | Archive 106 | Archive 107 | Archive 108 | Archive 109 | Archive 110 | → | Archive 115 |
Archive 108: November 2022
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haviland, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haviland, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockton, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 02:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, hope you are fine
Please take a look on this page Mela Loot Liya as itself described Unofficial song of PSL. Here you can see the official PSL songs. I think there should be no place for this page on Wikipedia as its not notable song more than sung by Ali Zafar.
Please comment and take action (Deletion or Redirect to PSL) if you see any problem. Thanks M.Ashraf333 ( talk) 06:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Please don't draftify a page when there is already consensus that any deletion should be through AfD. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 19:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Thanks for reviewing the page I made Plaza Verde Park. Can you share what the page needs to make it notable? I'm not sure how that works with places. Thank you! JaneClawsten ( talk) 19:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, would you mind sharing what about the page lacks notability? I've included various sources such as The Washington Post, Miss America Foundation, Eater, etc. I've also double/tripled cited some points. Medievalonion ( talk) 17:15, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
You were apparently the reviewer on the page Autry Technology Center, but I'm not sure what you reviewed. The page that currently appears is just a redirect to "List of CareerTech centers in Oklahoma". This is not the page I wrote; I can repost if you need it. If there's a problem with the page I wrote, please let me know what it is. Thanks. TulGuy ( talk) 17:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I don't get your concept of "zero notability". This is a technical college with almost 22,000 yearly students, sponsored by the State of Oklahoma. Are you saying technical colleges are not worthy of note, or anything in the State of Oklahoma is not worthy of note? The article itself goes into the History, Programs, Other campuses, Enrollment and Accreditation of the institution, and I really don't think there's anything wrong with it. So if you're not going to change your mind, what's the appeal process here?
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riordan, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 02:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clints Well, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 03:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't understand why you tagged the article even though there are three sources and an external link. Sakiv ( talk) 04:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Onel. I hope You are well. You noted that the article did not resolve the conflict of interest. I noted on my page that I was asked by its original author to correct and edit the article from a neutral point of view. Please look again. Thank you. StupidPingvin ( talk) 17:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Starting a Talk page on the guy but in the meantime I've taken down your notability note. Could you outline why you think he's not notable? It's essentially an adapted translation of the German article and he's also listed here as being of high interest. thanks! NerdyThursdays ( talk) 11:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello. You say the page has been deleted before. Point me to the older version that was deleted. I need to see the content of the former page. Amaekuma ( talk) 13:58, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969, I will like to first thank you for following my edits. I believe this is not the first time you have reviewed a page I created. However, I disagree with placing a notability tag on 'Julian Opuni'. This is because
1. Some Wikipedia articles on persons pass the notability mark because of the organisation the person heads. This has been true for politicians and public officeholders such as judges even in the absence of good reference sources. Fidelity Bank is a major banking organisation. Fidelity Bank is NOT A SUBSIDIARY of any global bank but a bank on its own footing. There may be another bank called Fidelity elsewhere in the world but this is not related to the bank Julian Opuni heads. In my part of the world, most banking CEOs are non-notable in Wikipedia standards because they head subsidiaries of larger global banks no matter the bank's balance sheets. Fidelity Bank is an exception. It was started as a finance institution by Ghanaian entrepreneurs before gaining bank status.
2. There is a bit of secondary coverage that comes with Julian Opuni. An example of secondary coverage provided as a source is the Guardian article about Julian Opuni.
3. The subject matter is news worthy. Julian Opuni from this article is shown to attract news coverage by what he says per his position constantly with time. I have shown this by telling Julian Opuni's story chronologically with time.
Please revisit this tag. I was hoping you would allow for the talkpage to be created first before tagging the page. Thanks in advance. Any suggestions to avoid future tagging of the page is welcome Ataavi ( talk) 16:28, 4 November 2022
I have added additional citations to the article Eller (sculpture) which you were interested in as you requested. Gazozlu ( talk) 19:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
You recently turned Feed tha Streets III from an article to a redirect. You redirected to the discography, can you explain why you did this? you didn't give me reason. User:3peatlol$ ( talk) 6:20PM Novemeber, 4 (EST)
I want to ask why did you mark the article Tayseer al-Jabari as possibly non-notable? The article cites a number of secondary sources which speak about details in the subject's life other than his death. Quantum XYZ ( talk) 11:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I have added some context and relevant citations to Florida–Miami baseball rivalry that should help introduce why the rivalry is notable for both programs. Just letting you know so there can be a second opinion with respect to this. Ben hen 1997 00:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
You revereted my edit on jane street for a GNG test or something. What does this mean? Humulator ( talk) 01:58, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969! Replying to your message, I would like to ask You how and on what basis did you assume that a conflict of interest exists between Mr Kawabe and myself. Before our meeting, I never met, never contacted him, I did not know him. After reading an article about his role in James Bond movie, I wanted to meet him and ask some question regarding the shooting of James Bond movie. I did not publish any article about the conversation with Mr Kawabe and I did not get paid for any not-sport-related article in the last 10 years! I plan to make some other interview with other James Bond movie staff members too, but no one got and get me paid for these in the past and in the future as well! If I manage to accomplish many interviews as I plan, maybe I will compile a book in some years. But this is just a long-term goal, nothing sure. The point is the conflict of interest does not exist! I hope it would be sufficient information for You! Thank You Mrandrew16 ( talk) 06:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Onel5969! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hello. I came on Wikipedia to bring my own side of the world to the fore. To write about a part of the world that you will never understand, care for or even write on.
You keep meddling things you know nothing about nor care for. Let me be.
You even went as far as trying to get a perfectly good page I created to be deleted (Thank goodness for the intervention of an admin).
FOCUS ON THE THINGS YOU CARE ABOUT ENOUGH THAT YOU'D WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THEM. STOP USING UP AND COMING WIKIPEDIANS TO EARN CHEAP POINTS. Amaekuma ( talk) 14:08, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Onel5969. Thank you for your work on Pol Calvo. User:Robert McClenon, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Contains promotional language.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Robert McClenon}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't understand either. You had marked an article as reviewed, and I thought it contained promotional content, and reverted your marking of it was reviewed. The message that was put on your talk page then, as you said, blow up your talk page. Yuck. Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:57, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
</nowiki<
Should be all fixed now. –
Novem Linguae (
talk)
19:47, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Hello, I have created a draft page on professor Mark Keil (professor), a prominent researcher in my domain of study and submitted it for review. I see that you have added a tag "Undisclosed Paid" to this page. Writing this to request you to let me know what led you to think that and how may remove that tag. Because I know I haven't been paid to do this work, but I wanted to check with you first as to know what led you to think that. Also, a few other editors removed my news article citations which work as secondary sources to the content since that was written in the LEAD section. I am planning work on that again and add few other references to make the article strong and remove the other tags as well.
Can you please help out on this? How can I remove those tags? User_talk:Vamsy_Alapati 12:59, 7 November 2022 (EST)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moqui, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moqui, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
I've declined the G12 on Melin-y-Wig. It might be a copyvio. It might not be. So that makes it fails the unambiguous part of G12. See Talk:Melin-y-Wig for more details. -- Whpq ( talk) 15:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
You rolled back a revision I made to the iMore page, which is current a stub here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_community#iMore
Let's discuss this rollback, please. The basic facts about the iMore site are quite outdated: iMore is not a Canadian website, nor is it edited by Joseph Keller. And important facts aren't included here, beyond who the current editor in chief is: The site is owned by Future, among the world's largest media companies, and iMore runs a fairly successful podcast that isn't mentioned here at all. Wikipedia itself links back to the iMore site often, from pages on the iPad, iOS, MacOs, Apple Inc, and others, and Techmeme links to it extensively, suggesting relevance and notability. 63.125.140.62 ( talk) 17:06, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
If I'm not well versed then I wouldn't be creating such articles to begin with. You are not adding any improvements by just tagging the article. Just like your nomination for deletion over Ricky Meinhold last year. Which I'm sure you never read through any of the sources cited. And you're tagging the article based on your opinion. Tag it for a real reason. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cucamonga Junction, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 03:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi! What's up with that 'Notability' tag on Andrej Studen? I've completed my work there and wil not continue any further. If you believe the article does not meet the notability criteria, please nominate it for deletion. Or remove the tag. Thank you. -- TadejM my talk 17:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from
2022 California Proposition 29, which you proposed for deletion. I stated my reasoning at
Talk:2022 California Proposition 29.. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!
Micler (
talk)
16:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Onel5969. Did you find more sources showing that Woh Mera Dil Tha, which you marked as reviewed, passes WP:GNG? I've previously AfDed a couple of similar articles, from what I see most of the current refs aren't reliable, e.g., Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Hip in Pakistan though I might be missing some references. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 22:06, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Genius Award |
I appreciate your contribution to Wikipedia Vaishnodevimandir ( talk) 07:45, 11 November 2022 (UTC) |
Hello Onel, Draft:Adrian Bouchet: I've removed questionable lines and added receipts for rolls of film. I completely deleted the part with the theater play. I hope the article is ok now. DinoKenner ( talk) 09:10, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
If you look at the sources I cited in this article, you will find that everything in the article can be traced back to them or to other Wikipedia articles. The exception is the statement that Standard Telephones and Cables did not manufacture test equipment, which is the sort of statement that you would not expect to find anywhere. It is based on personal knowledge: I used to work for STC. I was going to delete the refimprove template, but perhaps there is some other issue that I have missed. EEye ( talk) 11:05, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
Please review the notability and primary sources tags on the page for The Connecticut State Medical Society. There are no primary sources references, and the notability is not in question.
Thanks!
Chris Cczollo ( talk) 19:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
hi. according to Wikipedia:NFOOTBALL and Current guideline, article Aria Barzegar is notable. no new wp:CON are decided. please Do not make unusual edits. you done this before and that was wrong because of future events. we have article 2034 FIFA World Cup that will held in 11 years later then you redirected article that will held in this month? if i see this actions again i will ask admins to check your edits. be aware of wp:3RR in above article too. Miha2020 ( talk) 23:34, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Onel5969, I noticed that you tagged the article China Folk House Retreat as lacking notability. However, I have provided some reliable sources such as the Washington Post and China Daily. And obviously they are independent of this organization. Can you consider reviewing it? ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race ( talk・ contribs) 06:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your review.
If you look at the sources I cited in this article you will see if they can be verified. Nikkan Sports and Sports Hochi are some of the leading newspapers in Japan, and full-count.jp is a popular baseball site. In addition, the cited PDF files of agreements and regulations, such as the NPB Agreement prepared by the NPB Organization, are published as official documents by the JPBPA, the players' association of which active players are members, and can be verified as reliable published primary source that can be cited under the guidelines of primary source. Quotations from these articles are used to describe the regulations and rules in a nutshell. And see the Teams index on the official Teams index - NPB.jp site cited in the External links.
Thanks.
ELBOW01 ( talk) 17:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your prompt attention.
ELBOW01 ( talk) 19:35, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hidden Springs Mission, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 07:03, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi – you reverted my article on Wayne Randazzo as UPE/COI. This is incorrect. I've never been paid by Wayne Randazzo — or anyone else — to edit Wikipedia/any Wikimedia project. I have no personal tie to Wayne Randazzo; he's not a friend of mine, and in fact I've never met him personally or communicated with him personally about Wikipedia or anything else. My information is sourced entirely from the articles cited in my WP article (though I began with the Wikidata item/Wikimedia Commons category as I was tagging my photos and had taken a photo of him at a Met game). I have been adding information and photos on New York Mets-related subjects since ~2015 (and I edit under my real name) and I've never engaged in paid editing. I'm just a fan of the New York Mets and a radio listener. D. Benjamin Miller ( talk) 14:20, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
I completed the addition of many more references; I'm pinging you as you requested (I hope this is the right way to do it). Thanks!
Gabriel.A.Wainer ( talk) 17:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi there. I missed the window to contest the speedy deletion nomination, but would you be able to help me bring this page back as a draft? I'd like to make some improvements. Thank you for your help. HPLeu ( talk) 19:20, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ Onel5969! Hope you're doing well.
Lately, I've been trying to form a solid idea on which details merit a mention in an article, and which ones are best omitted. I was sifting through some recently created pages and happened upon Fry Pioneer Cemetery. The question I have pertains to this sentence:
"It has sparse vegetation and is surrounded by a chain-link fence."
In this case, would these two details be regarded as trivial, or is there some encyclopedic value? "It has sparse vegetation" in particular, considering that the state of the vegetation may not remain the same?
Thank you for your time and your hard work! Mooonswimmer 22:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Spring, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 04:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long Valley, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 04:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ Onel5969! Hope you are doing well.
This article was declined previously. I have edited to add more content and appropriate sources. It would be very helpful if you could take look at it and suggest how I can improve it.
Karmaker ( talk) 05:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lower Tillman, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 06:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi i want to tell you that Hazara Divison is not a duplicate article of Hazara Pakistan. "Hazara Pakistan" article is about historical region in Pakistan, and Hazara Division is about administrative sub-division of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Hazara Division was merged into Hazara, Pakistan region article for not having enough content. 202.69.12.17 ( talk) 11:31, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
There was no discussion conducted for merger, it was unilaterally merger for not having enough content, now i added the content and their is no reason left for merger.
If in future any user has any valid reason for merger then they can start the proper discussion for it. 202.69.12.17 ( talk) 11:44, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Please also see this [1], Because of merger other editors are removing historical content and converting historical article, like other administrative sub-divisions article.
Also see this [2], there is a history of these type of content removal and converting historical article into administrative subdivision article. Splitting article is the only way to and this confusion/Dispute. 202.69.12.17 ( talk) 12:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Onel5969. For V-Mart Retail, which you marked as reviewed, did you find more reviews passing WP:NCORP? Most references are routine acquisitions, retail prices, or other announcements. My WP:BEFORE search didn't find much that passes WP:SIGCOV and I don't think it passes notability but I'm hesitant in AfDing this. Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 20:35, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello again @ Onel5969. I'd like to hear your perspective regarding a few phrases in this article (all in the "Facilities" section).
"The mattresses are from Sealy Corporation." My gut instinct was to remove this. Especially considering the source is a Telegraph Travel article, which also includes a link for readers to book at the hotel. The language tends to be a bit 'promotional' in such articles. Or is there no harm in mentioning it?
"The hotel has a signature scent designed by perfumer Olivia Giacobetti which is reflected in the bath products." An interesting tidbit, but is it necessary? Not too sure about this one.
" The hotel also includes ... a 2,500-square-meter spa with three hammams; 10 wellness rooms, a hairdressing salon, manicure and pedicure cabins, an indoor heated pool, a jacuzzi, and a health club in a glass cube equipped with Life Fitness machines." Would it be better to just leave it at "The hotel also includes a 2,500-square-meter spa"?
What do you think of the rest of the "Facilities" section in general and do you think the {advert} tag can be justifiably removed from the article?
Mooonswimmer 20:41, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, it's been awhile. I just wanted to say that I do keep the NPP school on my mind and I'm sorry it's taking me forever. Anyways, I did have a question that's kind of related? So I noticed that Weight phobia redirects to Anorexia nervosa. I had to switch to desktop view to actually see the redirect page as it is (I won't have access to my computer for a bit) and I noticed that it's an R from merge. That complicates what my original train of thought was... that the redirect is kind of vague and might be better targeted elsewhere. Is that even possible with redirects related to merges or are they always just left alone? I noticed the disclaimer about not being deleted for page history reasons. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:59, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rare Metals, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rare Metals, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969. I see you redirecting to an old project for this page Im working on? Im currently in progress updating all the cites to film awards and coverage. What am I missing that you keep rolling back on? On COI, Im helping fix the earlier bad redirect. Regarding notability, she is an award-winning filmmaker, with a new film at big festival in process. I can point to many other filmmakers with less notability with pages. Pls advise? LRB2022 ( talk) 01:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wahweap, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 04:17, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969
I just received a notice that the EaseUS Todo Backup article I submitted was marked for deletion.
This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising.
I have reviewed the content of the two help pages you provided, and in response to the suspicion that the page is advertising, please allow me to explain the following.
1. Google search results show 1.8 million matches for "EaseUS Todo Backup," In the process of finding reliable citation sources, I found that it has been vetted by PC World, The Guardian, etc.
2. The only thing I think looks suspiciously like advertising in the article is that different versions of the product were mentioned.
3. The WikiProject Software project mentions that Wikipedia created the project to improve Wikipedia's coverage of software articles, which was also actually my original purpose for writing this article.
While I agree that the page may not be neutral enough, I think it should be marked as unbalanced, not deletion.
I want to make another change to the content, but I'm still not sure exactly what caused the deletion. So I would appreciate it if you could take the time to tell me exactly why. Thanks! Carlytuan ( talk) 01:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Malo95. I noticed that you recently removed content from
2022 World and European Wheelchair Handball Championship without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
🤾♂️
Malo95 (
talk)
06:50, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi thanks for your work
As the title says your redirected the two pages above. However both have sources from the only two current newspapers in the country! Not sure where else one could get more sources.
Presumably i could work on the article to make it longer. But if i continue to find refs in those two papers will you continue to make it fail WPGNG?
Thanks again. Eleutherius ( talk) 15:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I noticed that you put Muevete en Bici in draftspace. I futz around with the bicycle infrastructure and sustainability articles on here and I’d like to help improve it. The Mexico City version of Ciclovia is notable and I will build that out if I can. What else does it need? Any comments on what specifically needs to be improved? jengod ( talk) 15:30, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
A decision needs to be made on whether or not to split Cardiff Arms Park - To split or not to split. There are two options which have been agreed. SethWhales talk 16:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed that you're the one checking the page I made Sela Guia often. I just want to tell you that I made a draft out of that article, and I'm wondering if you could review that too? It's Draft:Sela Guia, thank you. Master jk ( talk) 00:51, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969, We would like to replace the outdated and in many ways incorrect English Wikipedia page of Douglas ( /info/en/?search=Douglas_(cosmetics)) with the new and current English page. We have recently tried to redirect users from the old page directly to the new and constantly updated page ( /info/en/?search=Parfümerie_Douglas) and to delete the old one. You undid this process yesterday. Could you briefly explain why? The page does not provide any added value for Wikipedia users because the information is very outdated. In addition, we are convinced that there are now too many different pages related to Douglas and that this leads to confusion. PR Douglas ( talk) 08:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Dear editor, I have noticed that you have deleted the content from the article ‘Faculty of Science, Charles University. I would like to ask you how many sources you would expect. The sources – Živa and Vesmír – are sources described by GNG (Živa is published by the CAS, Vesmír is quite well established and has been published since 1871, nowadays published by a private company). I would also mention the governmental act. With many thanks Martin Tauchman ( talk) 12:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
I'm unsure as to what content you believe was copywritten in the Franz Lanzinger article, which if you had read my last edit would've found that many of the references I used are from Wikipedia pages already. (Gubble, crystal castle, Actual Entertainment.) I'm unsure how anything I linked to isn't within fair use as their already being used actively on the site or publicly accessible information explicitly on Wikipedia. Even if it was, deleting the entire article seems like overkill as I don't even know what the issue was so I now need to restart from scratch. KunoDemetries ( talk) 13:15, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello @ Onel5969], I appreciate you opting to move the Rwanda Mountain Tea article to a draft that others would have just deleted without consideration. Since I saw this article I have been working to improve it as I am just passionate about African topics. I uncovered the contribution of Rwanda in the tea industry and with multiple awards won but yet no proper coverage on Wikipedia. I took this on and did hours of research to arrive at its current state. I'd like it to move it to the article space but wanted to draw your attention before I did so. Thanks @ Flixtey Flixtey ( talk) 12:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
The two sources I've quoted are Sky News Arabia and AlAkhbar.info, one of the largest news agencies of the country. Wouldn't that kind of sources for an public transit project for a million-inhabitants city be enough? Thanks :) Tidjani Saleh ( talk) 14:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
Thanks for the review page ThomasBrown ( talk) 16:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC) |
Hey,
I now feel like more of these joke political candidates are going to appear more and more with Gen Z-dominated social media, who are the ones who know how to use Wikipedia nowadays too. Perhaps I'll advise to semi-protect all election articles from now on to protect articles from these self-proclaimed candidates by Gen Z? Thanks! Yourlocallordandsavior ( talk) 22:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Under Category:Canadian sculptors is this category which should be removed. The artist has a page and this must have been made by mistake but I'm afraid to touch. Could you do it please, big brother? Thanks, Joan arden murray ( talk) 20:41, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
If it weren't for @ Hansen Sebastian:, the five sources I added wouldn't have been deleted. The race is obviously notable, as Motorsport.com, one of the biggest (multilingual!) motorsports-based sites wrote about it too. Ricciardo Best ( talk) 11:37, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
The category:Members of the RCA, an editor has created 2 sub categories which need to be removed. Members means both "full" and associates. Also I looked up Ernest Thompson Seton and he was an Associate. Could you take a look at this when you get a chance? Thanks, Joan arden murray ( talk) 19:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Here is why the article should not have been moved to Draft.
The term "Look Up!", has been used in different calendar years by established journalists, in established publications. These established journalist are, Sharon Mizota, Chadd Scott, and Brett Bralley. The following publications are the publications that used the term "Look Up" in the description of Artists' Billboards, Forbes, Los Angeles Times, and the Newsroom for San Jose State University.
One of the contributing sources in support of this article "Look Up!" is Sharon Mizota. Mizota is a recipient of an Andy Warhol Foundation Arts Writers Grant, and an art critic whose writing appears regularly in the Los Angeles Times. In 2008, the title of a Los Angeles Times article she authored on Artists' Billboards was entitled "Look, up in the sky! It’s women’s art."
Another one of the contributing sources in support of this article "Look Up!" is Chadd Scott. Scott covers art and travel for Forbes.com in addition to owning and operating seegreatart.art. In 2020, Scott's opening to his Forbes article on Artists' Billboards went, "Look up. You may see work by your favorite artist."
The third contributing source in support of this article "Look Up!" is Brett Bralley. Bralley is an editorial, marketing, and UX writer and editor specializing in science, technology, and innovation. Her work has appeared in higher education outlets, such as Washington Square (San José State University), UAB Magazine (The University of Alabama at Birmingham), Celebrate (Hoffman Media), Coastal Living (Meredith Corporation), Lookout Alabama, The Anniston Star, and more. In 2021, Bralley's opening to her San Jose State University's Newsroom article on Artists' Billboards went, "There’s a new art exhibit opening this week in San Jose — but you won’t find it in a gallery. Instead, look up."
If multiple reliable publications have discussed a topic, as the case here, across multiple calendar years, this improves the topic's probability of being covered in Wikipedia.
The subject matter of these Artists' Billboards that have been described as Look Up! are based on the use of billboards for addressing social issues. The term Artists' Billboards is based on an academic paper by Colombian artist Patricia Correa published in Theory Now. Theory Now is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal of contemporary critical thought.
Every reference in this "Look Up!" article is supported by reliable sources who speak to an art exhibition on a billboard as being related to a social justice issue.
Three references, two of which occurred in the same calendar year used the term/phrase Look Up! for mass public dissemination. In 2015, The Billboard Creative was the curator of an event featuring 14 artists from seven countries. In utilizing the services of PR Newswire, published the following press release, "Look Up! Billboard Creative Art Show Open on the Streets of L.A. Through May 15."
In 2021, Silicon Valley Fine Art and Real Estate Broker Anna D. Smith curated two billboard events. In utilizing the services of Eventbrite, an online event management and ticketing website for mass dissemination, published the following titles to these events, "Silicon Valley's Newest 'Look Up!' Exhibition Tickets, Oct 18 - Nov 17, 24-hours, and "Anna D. Smith's 'Look Up! 2' Hope & Beauty Art Exhibition Tickets, Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 1:00 AM."
Published means, for Wikipedia's purposes, any source that was made available to the public in some form.
The reliability of a source depends on context. Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made in the Wikipedia article and is an appropriate source for that content.
Across decades, in different calendar years, Artists' Billboard curators and journalists have used the term or phrase "Look Up!" to describe an art exhibition involving Billboards. I sincerely hope you will restore the article back to Wikipedia.
Selena Ebony ( talk) 00:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
I was wondering why you redirected The Boardwalk station to GRT. This makes no sense as the station page is now gone CanadianBrick1 ( talk) 04:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
I am happy to work in draft status. I understand much that is irrelevant to presenting Mason's achievements needs to be cut. I have added statements to the my user page and the draft talk page to address UPE and COI issues. Do I need to do more for the UPE and COI issues? I did not click "Submit your draft for review" but there has been a lot of revisions made. I will continue seek your and other's help. ParaDocs ( talk) 04:39, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey,
Talking here as you were reviewed my old articles, I have created a new article Saudi Vellakka, could please take a look ? Ameer al safar ( talk) 08:12, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Please analyze both the articles.
2. Rautela
TheManishPanwar ( talk) 15:26, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, can you please explain to me what is the problem with the David Mayer page I created? Surely the dab page should be called 'David Mayer (disambiguation', not 'David Mayer', which is the name of the professor in question. Are you suggesting I create a page called 'David Mayer (academic)', and then leave the 'David Mayer' page as a dab page? Some guidance on this would be useful, as I keep on asking for clarification and I'm just told 'that is the protocol' without any guidelines being referred to. Thanks. Jwslubbock ( talk) 17:15, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raso, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) Mangoe ( talk) 13:40, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
The AfD in 2017 for List of years in video games was for an WP:OR article that listed video games. The article that you blanked was an unrelated article of the same name in the Lists of years by topic series. I'd like to restore it as part of the series. How do I go about showing that distinction? Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 14:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Onel5969: The issue is that the subject of your article is not the primary subject. Most likely, there is no primary subject. So once you create your article, a hatnote on both pages would suffice. 09:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
My reply: I see... So I should add said hatnote in Henry William Brown the ace and Henry W. Brown the footballer and that's it?
I want to stress the fact that EVERY link to Henry W. Brown is related to the footballer. There is not a single link to Henry W. Brown that is related to the ace. I made sure of that. So there is no point in keeping Henry W. Brown as a redirect to Henry William Brown.
Thank you for trying to find a way.
PS: Do you know know how to archive sources/references? 14:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
You probably missed the notification of my reply, so I am bringing it to you. Barr Theo ( talk) 21:40, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neff, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 05:55, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for your work reviewing the articles I make. I don't know how you do it but it always seems to be you who gets there first. Thanks a bunch! Schminnte ( talk) 17:52, 24 November 2022 (UTC) |
Hey, it's me again. :) I have another redirect question. I wanted to double-check that Lock 3 doesn't get mentioned as a neighbourhood elsewhere like it was before it was a redirect as it's a lock that ships pass through [3]. Is there a way to see what pages use a specific redirect? I'm assuming there's some way to do this because I'm fairly certain I've done something like this in the past, but I can't remember how. If you know, I'd appreciate an answer. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 05:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luzena, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 05:12, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
As the creator of English Colony of Barcelona Football Team, I am here to inform you that I have made a mistake. When I created this page I was convinced that Sociedad de Foot-Ball de Barcelona and Team Anglès were the same entity, so I placed it all on the same page, but I have now realized that they ain't. The Sociedad was an entity that existed between 1892 and 1896, and who in addition to Britons also had Catalans and even Frenchman in its ranks. Team Anglès, on the other hand, was a team that was formed three years later, existing in 1899 and 1900, and whose players were strictly British (not once a non-Briton played for them). I thought they were the same thing because a few players played for both sides, but inheriting a few players from a deceased club doesn't mean you are the same.
When you reverted my changes you justified it as "no reason to split", but I know that the real reason that led you to revert my changes was because of my use of the redirect page ( Team Anglès). And I get it, redirect pages should not be recycled because it screws up the links. But I can assure you that every single link will be corrected and re-linked accordingly.
So... I am here to ask you if you will let me correct my mistake. I swear I will never recycle a redirect page ever again. Clenixon ( talk) 13:00, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Why did you add a redirect tag to Inside Voices / Outside Voices? The page seemed to be complete. Could you please remove it and restore the changes I and some others made? SaltieChips ( talk) 12:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
It is a series of International Film Festival editions, it is notable, there is no second guess to it. Only thing is it was non competitive edition by directorate of film festivals. Kindly do not disrupt the flow. One Independent source is already added, soon will update more, in the mean time u may tag them. Request you not to redirect without discussion. Fostera12 ( talk) 17:04, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
The basic notability is already established, issue is with additional secondary sources, will do it by another 24 hrs, pls be patient, and tag the article in the mean time. Will handle article live, no need of draft. I respect your wisdom, and expect the same from you. Thank you Fostera12 ( talk) 17:30, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
I do get what notability is, and I have now updated the articles with a ton of secondary sources. I still have lot of work to do on IFFI, let me do my work. I did not attack you as far as I am aware. If you felt that way i truly regret for inconvenience caused to you. Thank you. Fostera12 ( talk) 09:04, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
sorry to trouble you. I regret addressing you like that, will take care going forward. Thank you for your patience. Fostera12 ( talk) 13:33, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boquillas, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boquillas, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello Onel5969,
Can you please explain your rationale for reverting the expansion of Ginn & Company from a redirect to a stub?
–Mabeenot ( talk) 04:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969
I strongly disagree with the decision to remove and redirect this article's webpage to Looney Tunes Golden Collection. None of these cartoons appear on the Golden Collections and since there is no comprehensive Looney Tunes set- it is important for animation collectors to know where they can find each individual cartoon. This DVD is one of the most important Looney Tunes sets since it is one of the few that contain a character's entire filmography - in this case, Hippety Hopper and Sylvester Jr. If lack of sources is the problem I've also found another source from Jerry Beck at Cartoon Brew from 2013. [ [4]] Luxoman237 ( talk) 07:19, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highland Park, Cochise County, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 03:39, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I have made updates to the article at Rascal Reporters based on the tags added to the page - I have included more secondary sources on the page for key biographical information, including a mainstream music publication Prog (magazine) which I hope should also help with notability. I was hoping you might be able to review it when you have a chance? Djzap ( talk) 04:37, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Bear Spring, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe ( talk) 04:48, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969, I have introduced a new section "Selected awards and nominations" to satisfy your expectations for notability criteria. I hope you will observe that Sidabrine gerve (Silver Crane) award is the most prestigious award in Lithuanian cinematography. I ask you to consider notability criteria satisfied and remove the tag. With mere four million speakers worldwide, Lithuania has much lesser audience for any media, be it music, cinematography or literature. The nation nevertheless should be given support and fair playing ground. Sincerely, User:Ttk371 — Preceding undated comment added 08:17, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Onel5969 Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. You can check the article when you have time. Magomed Shataev-- Товболатов ( talk) 11:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
I just came here to say that I appreciate constructive feedback, but considering the subject matter of my pages you moved to draftspace, a tag would be more than enough, or better yet, you could help complete them if you have the ability to do so, but after seeing some of the posts here you seem to already have had quite a number of people complaining about the same thing. Might want to tone it down a little. Wareno ( talk) 20:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
State highways are state highways. International road networks (such as the International E-road network), Interstate, national, state and provincial highways are typically notable. Of course you can try an AFD but seeing how the last few went ( WP:USRD/P) it might not go well for your side. Rs chen 7754 01:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Can you see if now the article Flag of Roraima is ok? Best regards. ✍A.WagnerC ( talk) 13:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
In what way does winning two Eisner awards, and having his work nominated for other comics awards, not fall under WP:AUTHOR #4: The person's work (or works) has received significant critical attention? (I should have put a dab notice on the top - my bad there.) - Mairi ( talk) 15:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I question your notability tag on Women's Rugby League European Championship especially when 2022 Women's Rugby League European Championship B has not been given such a tag. Sure the former in a work in progress and needs expanding, but if a single edition of a tournament is notable then surely the tournament as a whole is also. Mn1548 ( talk) 16:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
@ Onel5969,
I saw that you put a tag on my article INS Abhimanyu. I figured if you could give me some advice I could fix it and make it better. What are your suggestions?
अथर्व कॉल ( talk) 16:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I see you've moved Richard Cooke (journalist) to draft. Can you explain what could be done to improve it? Jimmyjrg ( talk) 21:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turkey Flat, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkey Flat, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969, per your suggestion I have enriched the article with quoting three (3) independent, reliable non-English media sources, delfi.lt, Lithuanian TV3 and Lietuvos rytas. All three sources publish exclusive articles devoted to the subject, unlike the Variety which, according to you, only mentions the subject. I ask you to compare the Emilis Velyvis article with the article about German film director of equal weight Leander Haußmann. The Haußmann's article cites a single reference yet invokes no questioning of notability. You have advised that imdb is not reliable yet confusingly, your own article Astrid Bodin relies on three (3) references from the same imdb and one (1) reference from the Swedish sibling of imdb.
I respectfully request to consider Velyvis notability satisfied and remove the tag.
Sincerely yours, Tom Ttk371 ( talk) 05:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi there @ Onel5969,
As you review my articles, I just want to let you know that I've created a new article, Sreejith Sarang, could you please check and review ? Ameer al safar ( talk) 08:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)