DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This archive page covers approximately the dates between October 2005 and December 2005.
Post replies to the main talk page, copying the section you are replying to if necessary. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.)
Could you have a look at project page and let us know your thoughts on the merge/split proposals please. Thanks!-- Light current 00:25, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
'O' I understand your reasons for moving irrelevant chit chat to the Project page from article talk pages. The only thing I'm concerned about is trying to find things on the project talk page. As time progresses, its going to get worse. Have you any suggestions on how to overcome this problem? I mean can we have more than one project talk page?-- Light current 00:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, when I said irrelevant I meant not particularly relevant to the page it was on. Any way have you any other suggestions re our project page? Its gonna get very big very quick, you know.-- Light current 01:22, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for the very nice looking image you added to Bode Plot. RJFJR 05:19, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Proposal for a new navigation link
Thanks in advance! Mamawrites 11:21, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Hello, User:Maprovonsha172 filed an RfM here. Please comment there, whether it be acceptance or rejecting. R e dwolf24 ( talk) 22:12, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Engineering Wiki is a wiki entirely dedicated to collecting information about Engineering. I invite you to join this wiki.
You did such a nice job on the Bode plot images could you look at doing one for the Nyquist plot article? RJFJR 01:04, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
No offence,'O' but just what did you study at college? User:Light current
I dug out my old textbook. Seems that given the transfer function in Laplace form H(s) you evaluate for H(jω) and convert to magnituded and phase H(jω) =A(ω) e j φ(ω) and plot A(ω) vs φ(ω) on polar paper for the Nyquist plot. You need to label points along the curve with the ω but you can display the whole -inf< ω < inf on one page. I don't remember using these either, we did a bunch of Bode phase plots though. Can you just take the data you used for the Bode Phase plot and change it to polar graphing? RJFJR 23:54, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
Your imaging package klunky is really good. can u try to add images with letters so that one can simultaneously indentify the leads? You must be given two barnstars :)-- Davy Jones 12:38, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Damn, nice work there, really helpful. You people deserve pay ;)
Q
Hi there; thanks for your caution. Don't worry: I don't intend on violating 3RR, but I'll periodically and judiciously continue to ensure that valid information regarding information remains in the bit article. You should also be concerned regarding this, since you've been active in reverting too. Thanks! E Pluribus Anthony 18:27, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Hello. The merge of articles is disputed. I much appreciate your opnion, thanks. -- Mateusc 02:35, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not sure exactly what protocol there is to respond to messages posted on my user talk page - if this is the wrong way please tell me. You wrote at User_talk:Fresheneesz#op_amp_edits about my op amp edits. I edited the op amp page because the edit would have helped me in my ECE class if it were there when I first looked it up. You said that "Generally, we want to cover opamp circuits the way they are used" - however obviously we can't go through every permutation of an op amp circuit - we need general cases to consolidate knowlege into learnable peices. I rearranged the page because it showed very clearly that some circuits were special cases of the differential circuit. So not only does it show the special cases now, but it shows where the special cases come from more clearly than before. My goal for this page is to display a even more general op amp circuit so that you can use one equation for any op amp circuit consisting of resistors and power supplys. I'd open to discussion and i'll repost yours and my comments on the discussion page. Fresheneesz 18:27, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Last thing, I changed the licencing of the image that you wanted me to change. I put it on open licensing so people could edit the image the same as editing a page - without creating a new image page. And its not like that image is a work of art - I could have drawn it myself - but I didn't want to waste my time. Images created for wikipedia should be as open as the pages created for wikipedia - but thats not my call to enforce. Fresheneesz 18:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
I'll remember that next time. But I think it would be much better for a clear link to exist that would allow someone to easily upload an updated file - someone who doesn't know the intricacies of wikipedia's uploading mechanism. Fresheneesz 21:34, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
- I think you have the link no matter what if you are the original uploader. But try going onto the picture's page without logging on. Fresheneesz 18:03, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Yea, I was aware. Most of my edits are minor edits (although i don't know whats generally considered minor), but I dechecked the box for automatically marking it now, because I don't think i can consistantly remember to decheck the box myself whenever I write a non-minor edit. Fresheneesz 21:15, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for fixing all my typos in the instantaneous phase article. I will try to remember not to edit late Friday night. KYN 07:34, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Why make pages difficult to read with multiple indents??-- Light current 02:18, 22 November 2005 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Light current ( talk • contribs)
I hardly call formatting for ease of reading MESSiNG with other peoples comments. THats a very exaggerated statement.-- Light current 02:20, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
Talking about making things difficult,
would you mind checking
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Beamforming&diff=next&oldid=26591284
for me?
Someone deleted a big block of text I wrote,
and replaced it with something that is technically true,
and definitely more concise, but (I think) less understandable.
(Should I slap {{Template:Technical}}
on it?
Should I keep *both* explanations?)
Thank you for encouraging us to make things more understandable. I hope I answered your question on Talk:Catenary. -- DavidCary 09:07, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for the review. I was worried that I was turning into the kind of person who insists that the article include my favorite "golden text". The sort of people who run a Wikipedia:Edit war against everyone who dares make a change to the article. I would rant against "encyclopedic language", but I've already done that at http://communitywiki.org/PlainTalk and Wikipedia:Make technical articles accessible -- DavidCary 18:53, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
This klunky has really proved helpful. Can we upload these images on wikipedia and use the code generated by klunky to draw circuits instead of uploading a circuit image. Also, I wanted to know if some free softwares are also uploaded on this site. -- Electron Kid 01:54, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
Can u tell me how to install or compile the gnuplot? I am unable to do so with my resources. is there any alternative to download the *.exe files from somewhere?-- Electron Kid 01:47, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Important discussion taking place on talk:electrical engineeringthat should interest all WikiProject electronics members.-- Light current 02:30, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I see a comment 'that was a lot of work'. Are you commenting on my work recently (yes it was!), or the fact that I replaced your work (I worried about this a bit).
The most work went into creating Equal loudness contours, Fletcher-munson curves, and Robinson Dadson curves Lindos1 Lindos2 . . . Lindos5, but I've been keen to get these available in scalable vector form. Now I'v done it, there seems to be a problem. Every day, one or two graphs are not loading onto the pages (random?)yet the files are there, and just re-saving the text page without change restores things till the next time. Any ideas why? I've flagged this on the bugs page, but no answers. Maybe .svg files all suffer this problem (I now see they are not common). -- Lindosland 01:35, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Ah I just realised you added your 'alternative version'. I do admire the way you generated your curves, but find that I constantly want to read off values, and the accuracy is only as good as can be estimated from the graph (Ideally I would add a table). Adding the log frequency scale, which your graphs don't have, makes for more accurate reading, and of course vector form means they can be blown up big.
Stop trolling. There is no room to debate that WP:AUM is not correct. -- Netoholic @ 04:56, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
You really don't know when to stop, do you? -- Netoholic @ 21:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Hello! I'm a bureaucrat on the Wikimedia Commons project. Your request for adminship is now pending for nearly a month. Our rules state "Nominations usually remain for seven days, for votes and comments. Admin status will be granted by a majority of at least 75% and a minimum of 4 votes". I'm sorry but I just see your request having 3 votes in 3 weeks. So that I am going to consider that your request has been rejected. Maybe you could re-apply in a few months. Thank you. villy ♦ ✎ 08:14, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
You said "A simple example is the difference between "Black Rat" and "black rat"." and I instantly got it (I think I did anyway). I ran into this on Polar bear when someone capitalized "racoon" claiming some kind of agreement was made somewhere on wikipedia. After verifying it was neither a vandal nor a newbie I was joyous to stop vandal-waching an article someone somewhere seems to be using as a something by periodic vandal tests of varying cleverness (or else it just seems that way like a cloud "looks" like a face). In any case, capitalizing species names makes sense when it distinguishes that name from what is not a proper noun. I still think racoon shouldn't be capitalized. But I edit war as little as possible (cause I'm lazy). WAS 4.250 06:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Your comment says reverted but you didn't [1]? I'm all for reverting, as you may guess. -- Pjacobi 09:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
I was not "putting words in [your] mouth" ... you made the post ... J. D. Redding
You seem to have done some good work on absorption waveometer, I would value your input on Television interference (radio transmitter interference) if you think that you can add any more to it. I am a HAM, and I have noticed that the EMC section of WP is jolly weak so I choose to add the example of TVI in UHF AM TV systems to WP to improve the EMC section. Cadmium 22:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
BTW the Klunky drawing tool is great thanks for putting a link to it on your page. Cadmium 10:26, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Here is a circuit diagram for a typical homemade unit, I may photograph my own home made unit and then add the photos to explain more about them. To use it connect a voltmeter to the terminals on the left, when the unit is exposed to a RF field (at the right frequency) then a DC voltage will appear at the terminals.
Also sorry for putting such a big diagram into the page, I am not that good at the markup langauge.
Cadmium 10:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
I am sorry but I have been a bit of a twit, I saw your user name in the list of editors for balun and somewhere in my mind I mixed that up with absorption waveometer. Please forgive me for being silly. Cadmium 18:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
That is interesting to hear that you did start on a HAM class, I was not trying to suggest that you did not know what you were talking about. I thought that you wanted to know what the absorption waveometer was and what it is used for. If you have done part of the course, you might already know about TVI. Did you get to that part, I did not do a class. I bought a copy of the course text book and taught myself. The EMC part of the book concentrated on harmonics and excessive field strength at thy neighborough's TV set. Did you do a UK or USA course ?
Also (sorry to be a bind), please could you help me with a circuit diagram. You might need to add more symbols to the software.
Could you do me a favour, I have tried to draw a light dimmer but I can not find the symbol for a SCR or a zenor disoide. I imagine that you having a back ground in electronics would be able to quickly see where the SCR and the zenor should go. Here is my source code
*snipped*
Cadmium 18:16, 21 December 2005 (UTC)