Hello, Nosepea68, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Diego (
talk)
09:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Please be careful with other people's comments when editing talk pages. You have removed with this edit the comment I posted after your commentary at Talk:Anita Sarkeesian. Diego ( talk) 13:28, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. NeilN talk to me 16:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Can you please read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. You're still not signing your posts properly and now you're top posting and adding incorrect templates. -- NeilN talk to me 19:00, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Nosepea68! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Anita Sarkeesian. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Your deliberate falsifying of a title of a source is particularly disruptive. NeilN talk to me 00:06, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Anita Sarkeesian. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Orange Mike | Talk 00:07, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Anita Sarkeesian. ///EuroCar GT 00:08, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anita Sarkeesian, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Cúchullain t/ c 00:11, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
-- Orange Mike | Talk 00:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
For fucks sake,
I am a n00b I admit, reason I flagged all Anita Sarkeesian parts was because I thought that is how to do it. I sincerely did not know my editing every single part (that a proper saying?) was counted as spam. Seriously I thought that after editing a part you must save them for later use.
Obviously that wasn't the case.
After all. I would like to have OrangeMike's Skype handle so I could discus this matter more closely or I can PM him with mine to continue this conversation.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 08:27, 24 October 2013 (UTC)I've refactored your recent post at Talk:Tropes vs. Women in Video Games. Per the WP:NOTAFORUM policy and the talk page guidelines, article talk pages are for discussing improvements to the article, not for expressing personal opinions on the subject. Is is especially inappropriate to engage in personal opinions regarding a living person. In the future, please keep all your talk page posts tied to specific and actionable article improvements. Violating the policies repeatedly will be considered disruptive and may lead to you being blocked or banned from editing. Thanks,-- Cúchullain t/ c 14:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Fuck this Cúchullain and Diego , I'm man enough take the blame. I have misinterpreted what been said, unintentionally though. And Cuch yes, I've read the guidelines ever since there's been a link to them.
I've refactored more of your comments at Talk:Anita Sarkeesian. Above, you were informed that posts that just give your personal opinions of a subject, rather than suggestions for specific article improvements, violate the WP:NOTAFORUM policy and the talk page guidelines. Your replies appear to acknowledge the problem at hand. It is additionally troublesome that virtually all of your edits serve to disparage this subject. Consider this your final warning to keep all your comments focused on article improvements. Otherwise, you will find yourself blocked or banned from editing in very short order.-- Cúchullain t/ c 04:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Cúchullain bud, there's no 100% neutral way to say stuff. I never have had problem to say that what I say on a talk page is not neutral. That said reliable source doesn't mean it's neutral. In Sarkeesian's case some sources are irrefutably [radical] feminist biased, making the article biased. If you can't comprehend that little bit, then I can just wonder why you have administrator status.
Nosepea68 ( talk) 07:12, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Let's discuss this further on talk. I think some of this material needs to be on the Tropes page, but I'd be willing to discuss the structure. I do agree that much of the material should be associated with the BLP, but if she didn't start the project, none of this harassment would have occurred. While directed AT her, such negativity was in RESPONSE to the project, IMHO. BusterD ( talk) 05:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Tropes vs. Women in Video Games, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.-- Cúchullain t/ c 05:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 14:46, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Tropes vs. Women in Video Games. Thank you. — Woodroar ( talk) 01:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
I have no interest in discussing anything with you. You have exhibited nothing but contempt for the due process of editing wikipedia, and a continued single mindedness to edit Anita Sarkeesian out of existence. Koncorde ( talk) 02:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Anita Sarkeesian, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Calling other editors "white knights" is never acceptable. Woodroar ( talk) 20:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:Anita Sarkeesian, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeilN talk to me 02:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
My skype is up, care to have a chat what you saying?
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Tropes vs. Women in Video Games. "Radical feminist" in this edit. You've been told time and time again to stop this kind of crap. NeilN talk to me 03:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Cúchullain t/ c 04:42, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Kevin Gorman, Cúchullain, Kurtis, BusterD, Woodroar, NeilN and Diego plus other users involved.
Nosepea68 ( talk) 18:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
You've been blocked indefinitely for continued disruption and violations of WP:BLP policy. Dreadstar ☥ 21:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JMHamo ( talk) 22:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC)