Hello, Albanian 7, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Battle of Muriq, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 20:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
The article Battle of Muriq has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. WP:BEFORE checks yield nothing.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
20:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Are you fluent in another language besides English? I would suggest you edit that language's Wikipedia instead of the English one. The grammar at The attack on the Soviet naval presence is not clear enough for this project, unfortunately. Ovinus ( talk) 22:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The attack on the Soviet naval presence, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vietnamese and Marine.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Please see the discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Albanian-Greek_border_incident the result was merge. Alexikoua ( talk) 02:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello Alexa, I wanted to ask you why you deleted the wikipedia article and for what reason Albanian 7 ( talk) 12:00, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for the reply. There was a discussion on the redirection of this article to another one. By the way the citation you provided were not supportive with the text of this article. Alexikoua ( talk) 00:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Albanian 7. I was fixing some 'no target errors' on your article
Albanian-Yugoslav conflict (these are were {{
sfn}} templates are used, but have nothing to link to), and noticed you had the Yugoslav forces as 3.600
. The English version of Wikipedia only uses commas for number grouping, as this is the form used in English speaking countries. So I've corrected it to 3,600
. See
MOS:DIGITS if you need any further clarification. -- LCU
ActivelyDisinterested ∆
transmissions∆ °
co-ords°
13:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi ActivelyDisinterested I'll just add a |ref as a source there because something doesn't work with the citation Albanian 7 ( talk) 15:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 10:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Albanian–Soviet split, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revisionism.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
signed, Rosguill talk 15:56, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Xhemati Alban, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.
Onel5969
TT me
11:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. signed,
Rosguill
talk
00:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Hello Rosguill,I don't understand exactly why I was banned for editing because of vandalism, but it's also the case because my edits where I specify sources are simply removed like that, the editors also don't enter any sources and add something completely different to edit Albanian 7 ( talk) 00:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Ok thanks, but I wanted to ask if you could also check out the talk page regularly in Nato vandalization if we find a solution for this, because even if an editor said we shouldn't change anything in bellugrents for the time being, many are still doing it Albanian 7 ( talk) 00:49, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albanian Resistance in Yugoslavia, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albanian Resistance in Yugoslavia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
23:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)I've reviewed your last three recent edits at Battle of Košare and it turned up that all three were serious cases of source misinterpretation. Therefore, I reverted your edits and explained the problem in the edit summaries ( [1], [2], [3]). I blocked you from editing that page. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
User:NormalguyfromUK, the so-called "Albanian-Greek border incident" that you keep reinstating, pertains to a POV of Operation Pyrsos that is traced back to Communist Albania; that is why it was merged with Operation Pyrsos. Please stop trying to reinstate an infobox that clearly lacks neutrality; per Template:Infobox military conflict § Usage. Interestingly enough, you were informed about this by another editor on 30 September ( here), after you tried to re-create the article. A few days later, on 13 October, you proceeded to coatrack Albanian–Yugoslav conflict § Background instead ( diff); it only came to my attention on 6 March.
Vanjagenije, i would appreciate it if you could take a closer look at the aforementioned article. Along with the infobox i mentioned above, User:NormalguyfromUK also added the claim that the Greek operation was supposedly the cause of the Albanian-Yugoslav conflict. This is clearly dubious, since the Greek operation occurred in August 1949, while the Albanian–Yugoslav conflict had already began in 1948. Of course, other than the subsection heading he/she created, there is nothing under it to support that. Even the claim that Yugoslavia supported the operation, which was actually the last stage of the Greek Civil War, has only one inline citation that lacks a page. That reference is Studies in the history of the Greek Civil War, 1945-1949 (1987); i tried to find anything that could support such claims within it, but i couldn't. It appears to be based on improper editorial synthesis, and is clearly off-topic as well. Furthermore, there is also a paper by historian Aleksandar Životić focusing on the topic of borderline tensions between Yugoslavia and Albania during 1948–1954, where he presented a number of related incidents; however, User:NormalguyfromUK who introduced it in the article ( diff), appears to have cherrypicked only certain information. Životić's paper is written in Serbian; unfortunately, my understanding is limited. Demetrios1993 ( talk) 02:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
You were blocked from an article for misusing sources and now you added a completely inappropriate citation here that doesn't say what you claim. You continue to mess with infoboxes, creating military conflicts where there aren't, adding inappropriate belligerents and flags to conflicts, along with WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Even after being reverted by editors, you continue to do this. You don't seem to be able to grasp basic concepts of editing Wikipedia or interested in learning and improving.
Please stop and reflect on what you're doing. If you continue, I will have to file a report on WP:ANI. Thanks. Griboski ( talk) 18:37, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
This is not a WP:RS for the 1981 protests as it is a claim from a member of the Hoxha family and contradicts claims by other sources. Web portals and blogs are not reliable sources and academic journals and books take precedence over them. Furthermore, these were clearly civil protests. Yes, troops were called in to quell the protesters but it is a fairly common thing governments do to suppress civil unrest. You can take a look at other examples such as the recent Iranian protests; all those articles use the civil conflict infobox and they are not spammed with flags. -- Griboski ( talk) 18:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Blocked sock.
Horse Eye's Back (
talk)
18:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Operation Valuable, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Stop adding incorrect flags and badly sourced figures to India boxes
Gugrak (
talk) 15:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Blocked sock.
Horse Eye's Back (
talk)
18:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Operation Valuable, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You've already been blocked from one page for misusing sources. Stop adding information that is not properly verified
Gugrak (
talk) 12:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to
naming conventions or
consensus, as you did at
Operation Valuable, you may be
blocked from editing. Seek a consensus instead of unilaterally moving the page.
– robertsky (
talk)
17:32, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
move a page disruptively, as you did at
Operation Valuable.
– robertsky (
talk)
17:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rhodesian Bush War, you may be blocked from editing. BoonDock ( talk) 22:17, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to,
Kosovo Police–Serbian clashes (2023), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's
guidelines for pages, so it has been
blanked and redirected to
2022–2023 North Kosovo crisis. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our
notability guidelines; (2) the article is
unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are
unreliable. The
page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may
revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.
Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.
The actual reason is that it's better to keep coverage concentrated; this is a notable event, but there isn't much to be said about it, apart from its background and context, and that's exactly what the 2022–2023 North Kosovo crisis article is about. The event is already covered in more detail in that article. — Alalch E. 07:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Albanian–Greek Border War, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. You are, once again, adding information that fails verification or misrepresents the sources. Source claims properly with reliable secondary sources.
Gugrak (
talk)
11:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ruach Chayim ( talk) 16:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring.
Ruach Chayim (
talk)
16:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
When you start a discussion on a talk page regarding a suggested renaming of an article, like you did at Talk:Operation Valuable, it is most unwise to ignore what other contributors say there, and move it anyway. Give the multiple blocks and warnings you seem to have received regarding related topics, you would do well to seek consensus, rather than risk further sanctions against you. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 14:48, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Hello, NormalguyfromUK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Guerilla BIA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 13:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Vidohovë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
StephenMacky1 ( talk) 12:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, NormalguyfromUK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Persecution of Greeks in Northern Epirus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Vidohovë (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Courcelles ( talk) 18:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, NormalguyfromUK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:War in Gollak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 13:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)