![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I made a nomination for Logical reasoning to the nominations page but I did a typo; last word in my submission before the question mark should be darkness not light. Is there a proper way to fix this? Thank you! Non-pegasus ( talk) 02:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dualism.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Contingency (philosophy) into
Draft:Contingency (philosophy). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk)
14:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
On 30 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Logical reasoning, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while feathers are light, and light opposes darkness, feathers do not oppose darkness? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Logical reasoning. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Logical reasoning), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Holism you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Cessaune --
Cessaune (
talk)
02:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
The article
Holism you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Holism and
Talk:Holism/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Cessaune --
Cessaune (
talk)
05:22, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
The article
Holism you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:Holism for reasons why
the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Cessaune --
Cessaune (
talk)
22:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Non-pegasus! Your additions to
Eros have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added
copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent
copyright and
plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. NebY ( talk) 15:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Non-pegasus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Contingency (philosophy), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 19:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)