![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Hi Nevermore27, Thank you for your recent contributions to Political party strength in Vermont. You appear to be knowledgable in the subject. However, without a reference that supports your edit and the edit of every other contributor to the page, it's impossible to know whether a given contribution is valid, or not. You could be a guiding light to others by providing references for your last two contributions! Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 15:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Nevermore27! I see you recently editing a whole slew of district court articles with "(added U.S. Attorney to infobox)." Can you justify this? The United States Attorney for a district is not part of its Court. (It's often true that they have an office in the same building as the Court or Courthouse, but that is not the same thing.) My inclination is that these edits are incorrect and should be reverted, but I wanted to discuss it with you first. Thanks! (Or maybe we should talk about it somewhere else?) jhawkinson ( talk) 22:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Why do you keep removing the Libertarian candidate from United States Senate election in Kentucky, 2014 ? According to sample ballots from Kentucky Secretary of State sample ballots for 2014 David Patterson is the Libertarian Party candidate and is on the ballot.
Removing candidates, no matter their party, poll numbers, or likelyhood of winning or losing is a disservice to users seeking information about the election and the campaign.
It also appears that there is a strong risk of edit warring and thats not helpful to anyone. Can you explain why you keep removing the Libertarian candidate? Can you cite a Wikipedia policy justifying this edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freiheit2014 ( talk • contribs) 03:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Now that Patterson is above 5% again, are you going to replace him in the top infographic? Patterson's polling is also greater than the margin between these two candidates, so the idea that he is irrelevant to the outcome is incorrect as well. Bnewmark42 ( talk) 02:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
As ANI is a high visibility page, posting links to your being doxed may not be want you want. See WP:OVERSIGHT to contact the folks who can make the edit go away from almost everyone's sight.
Also, please see WP:SIGLINK -- your signature needs to contain link(s) to your user, talk, or contributions page. NE Ent 03:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Nevermore27! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, — DerHexer (Talk) 17:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from
United States House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Arun Kumar SINGH
(Talk)
09:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
I see you've made some changes to the composition template for the Michigan House. I was going to do something, but was wondering how to do it. The Democratic field also needs to be divided as Harvey Santana was also expelled from his caucus earlier in the year. But, I also wonder if maybe we shouldn't do anymore than simply put an astericks by each of the numbers and add a footnote since while these two are expelled from their caucuses, neither has stopped caucusing with their respective party? This isn't like Olumba in the previous session who seperated himself from the caucus. This banishment seems to only apply to daily caucus meetings. What do you think? -- Criticalthinker ( talk) 07:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the bulk corrections. What is this Democrat term out of tense? It seems to be a Rush Limbaugh epithet form of usage that has found its way into wikipedia. Trackinfo ( talk) 19:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
I am sorry. The "welcome" message is automatically generated by the tool. An IP has been playing around with the "chief justice" designation on and off for some time. I misread your edit as just one more in the series. Sorry again. Capitalismojo ( talk) 18:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Political party strength in Massachusetts#Merge or separate the terms of re-elected politicians?. Thanks. —
GoldRingChip
11:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey, I see that you were the last one to update the composition of the Michigan House. I tried updating it, myself, but can't for the life of me figure out the column/row template. Can you add the resignation of Brandon Dillon ( http://woodtv.com/2015/08/03/dillon-resigns-from-house-to-head-mi-dems/) as of August 3? It should show 45/1 for Democrats with one vacancy. For the time being, the Republican caucus is still the same, though that could be changing very soon (possible two vacancies). Thanks. Hopefully, after you update it I'll be able to see what you did. -- Criticalthinker ( talk) 13:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
...without explaining why. Krett12 ( talk) 13:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
You deleted info in the Icelandic presidential election, 2016 that I had previously reinserted. If you want to repeat an edit that has been reverted by a registered user and with an explanation you should discuss it at the talk page, not just repeat your edit.-- Batmacumba ( talk) 21:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Why did you move Viðreisn to Restoration? (which is just one possible translation chosen by a Wiki editor and not an official English name). It was mentioned on the talk page that the name isn't official and there was a note in the text that it should be replaced whether was an "official English name". I think it should be moved back until they decide on an official English name (there are other possibilities: Awakening, Renaissance, Rising Again, Rebirth). Its generally better to discuss page moves before you make them-- Batmacumba ( talk) 12:35, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
I noted your recent edit to Nebraska gubernatorial election, 1990. As best I can tell, your change consisted solely of rearranging the sections, collecting all the material on the Democratic primary into one section and all the material on the Republican primary into another.
I'm inclined to agree with your plan of organization (and wish I'd thought of it first!) However, I have to complain about the fact that you didn't leave an edit summary. Looking at your contribution history, I see that you generally don't. I'd like to urge you to change your practice.
Unfortunately, articles on political subjects tend to draw lots of problem edits—vandalism, POV-pushing, and WP:NOTNEWS violations among them. For us article-watchers, failure to include an edit summary is a red flag: it can be a sign of an editor who's trying to change the article without drawing the attention of other editors, or the mark of a new editor who's not familiar with Wikipolicy and doesn't know about WP:SOAP. A brief explanation of what you're doing can save these article-watchers the time and effort that they'd otherwise have to devote to checking out your edit in detail.
Again, I've got no problem at all with your edit to the 1990 election article; I think it works better than my original organizing scheme. However, a concise edit summary like "Reorganized sections" wouldn't have taken much of your time, and would've saved me the time I spent going through the diff in detail. — Ammodramus ( talk) 21:12, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Since you've provided many of the poll numbers on the Icelandic_parliamentary_election,_2016 page, I wonder if you know why there seems to be a sudden cut-off in polls for the 2015 parliamentary election in Iceland after the end of July? I haven't found any more recent numbers with a web search either, so I wonder if there is some prohibition against polls X months before the election or something. Anyway, if new numbers become available, I would be happy to update the graph. Amaurea ( talk) 18:41, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
United States Senate Committee on Armed Services into
Historical member rosters of the United States Committee on Armed Services. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk)
15:41, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Chop of genitals and bleed to death you worthless sack of shit. -- Batmacumba ( talk) 00:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
See WP:JR. It is not true that Standard for Srs. and Jrs. is to put a comma. Dicklyon ( talk) 03:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
I reverted just for prevention 'cuz my data is accurate. Once you reincorporate the correct data please feel free to switch back to the old format (and use this message as reference if anyone complains about an edit war). — Ahnoneemoos ( talk) 01:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Dennis Bratland. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Seattle mayoral election, 2017 seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
You are removing the only information about Republican, or right-of center candidates from an article with copious detail about Democrats and other left-of-center candidates. This has a blatantly biased appearance. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 20:45, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is
Any mention in article Seattle mayoral election, 2017 of Republican candidates' positions. --
Dennis Bratland (
talk)
23:48, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Because election results aren't certified until late November and the newly elected official doesn't take office until December, the Washington State Senate doesn't change its composition until then, meaning Dino Rossi is still serving as State Senator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UWHuskyFan ( talk • contribs) 08:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the tip! I never knew you could sign posts until now, so I appreciate the help -- UWHuskyFan ( talk) 08:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)UWHuskyFan
Hello, Nevermore27. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Template:Progressive Party (Vermont)/row has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Frietjes (
talk)
16:20, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:United States Senate elections, 2016 and 2017#Requested move 31 January 2018. —
GoldRingChip
12:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
The Senate election in Arkansas that should have been in 1914 was, instead, held in 1915. How should United States Senate elections, 1914 be edited?— GoldRingChip 18:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at United States Senate Committee on Appropriations shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Cousins ( talk) 10:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
As an aside, are you supporting Cynthia Nixon for NY Governor? Doug Cousins ( talk) 10:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/richard-shelby-officially-senate-appropriations-chairman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Cousins ( talk • contribs) 11:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
You wrote: "U.S. law states that Representatives elected in special elections assume office the day of the election" as you undid a revision to Conor Lamb on the puzzling dispute regarding now-U.S. Representative Conor Lamb's term commencement date.
Which law?
There are a few sources to support otherwise, such as federal law, Article Six of the United States Constitution, and even the House of Representatives itself (which maintains a guide showing that a Member-Elect becomes a Member once he has taken the oath of office) [1]
To recap, a person has not begun a Congressional term simply because:
(a) He is the presumptive winner of an election;
(b) The election results have been certified in his favor;
(c) He's going to be a Member of Congress;
(d) I support him and want him to win; or
(e) Any combination of the above.
Conor Lamb began his Congressional term on April 12, 2018 in accordance with federal law, the Constitution, and the rules of the House of Representatives. GnarlyLikeWhoa ( talk) 17:42, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Congress#Capitals. —
GoldRingChip
12:48, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
You've been changing membership in several Congressional committees for the current (115th) Congress. Are your changes corrections to an incorrect list or is it an update as membership has changed during the Congress? If it's an update, please restore the names and indicate that they are no longer members (such as by adding ", until July 2018"). These articles are supposed to keep the historial record, not just be a list of current memberships.— GoldRingChip 12:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Congress#Chronological order of polls. —
GoldRingChip
12:40, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you please stop edit-warring [2] [3] [4] and follow WP:BRD? I've posted 3 comments to you [5] [6] [7] on the article talk page and you haven't even bothered to respond. A Quest For Knowledge ( talk) 02:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. A Quest For Knowledge ( talk) 09:13, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
It appears that you have been
canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence
Illinois gubernatorial election, 2018. While
friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are
indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain
point of view or side of a debate, or which are
selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of
consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. See:
[14]
--
Elephanthunter (
talk)
04:59, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Pennsylvania's 7th and 15th congressional district special elections, 2018#Merged from separate articles. —
GoldRingChip
22:04, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you have edited the United States Senate election in Virginia, 2018, and just wanted to invite you to participate in a vote on the talk page about whether or not Libertarian candidate Matt Waters should be included in the infobox. 74.110.185.157 ( talk) 12:08, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi!, I guess we had the same idea to create drafts to NY Senate election article, when they'll get published, we can merge our articles together right? The only thing is the I have specific descriptions of the NY senate districts that I would like to add in, but everything else seems the same. VietPride10 ( talk) 23:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
@ Nevermore27: Just a friendly reminder. You have reached the WP:3RR limit on Ohio gubernatorial election, 2018. KalHolmann ( talk) 03:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I moved the sourced content to the relevant article United_States_elections,_2018 which for some reasons I didn't find yesterday. Given I'am a veteran Wikipedian I was able to monitor and preserve-move these sourced information. All fixed, no information lost. Yug (talk) 11:47, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Nevermore27, I noticed that you have made 3 edits inside an already archived/closed RfC? Those sections typically should not be edited once closed. Perhaps that would be better within another section? Just an idea/heads up incase you hadn't noticed. -- TheSandDoctor Talk 06:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Nevermore27. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The column you added to the MSC page about when the Justices hit age 70 is interesting. However, I am left wondering whether that is the optimal way of presenting the information. The rule in Michigan is that Justices (or any other judge) can serve past age 70, it's that they cannot file to run for re-election after they turn 70. Perhaps you know that, I don't mean to patronize you and tell you what you already know if so. But I am just wondering if the more relevant piece of information is the Justice's "out date" of when they'll be precluded from filing to run again. I applaud the spirit of column, certainly, just looking to possibly improve it. I saw it and got thinking that knowing when they turn 70 will still require me to do a fair amount of math to figure out when they next have to run for re-election after they hit 70. MrArticleOne ( talk) 23:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
I had to revert all your bold changes. Reliable sources have Paul Ryan as the 54th Speaker of the House. See further discussion at List of Speakers of the United States House of Representatives article. GoodDay ( talk) 16:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
My advice, if you disagree? open an Rfc at Paul Ryan asking which he should be shown as - the 54th or 62nd speaker. Whatever the result there, will determined the numbering of his predecessors. GoodDay ( talk) 21:11, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
I kindly invite you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn ( talk) 19:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, but both IMDb and "famousbirthdays" are specifically noted as unreliable sources - see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Deb ( talk) 22:28, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your edits to this committee page and the others. When I added the returning members, It was announced via press release BEFORE the resolution passed. That is why I updated them, so if there were any issues with that I apologize. The press releases are valid sources if they are published, so the information was good to publish. BlueRaider615 talk —Preceding undated comment added 19:43, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in the bolding issue of the election infobox earlier. We are now holding a final vote in order to reach a clear and final consensus. Please take a moment to review our discussion and vote in Template talk:Infobox election#Final voting. Lmmnhn ( talk) 14:54, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
United States House Financial Services Subcommittee on Diversity and Inclusion, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
00:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Chetsford ( talk) 03:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:Icelandic parliamentary election, 2016 has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing)
20:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Erpert blah, blah, blah... has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!
Spread the awesomeness of bubble teas by adding {{ Bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Thanks for your work on Worst Bakers in America. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 17:35, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
NPVIC factmaster |
Thanks for making NPVIC's wikipedia page the go-to-place for NPVIC info. I organize on this issue nationally and would love to connect up with you on what you do and what you're up for. Find me (pefty) on wikipedia or at npvgrassroots (at) gmail. Pefty ( talk) 19:02, 29 July 2019 (UTC) |
The file File:ICCCouncil.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Superseded by File:ICCCouncil.png, which is up to date and a better file format.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ♠
PMC♠
(talk)
20:35, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Nevermore27. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Gubernatorial lines of succession in the United States".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj ( 📧) 10:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Gubernatorial lines of succession in the United States.
User:Onel5969 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Very nicely done article. Keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 11:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello. While carrying out some routine maintenance work, I came across a few subpages of your user page that appear to contain content that was copied from articles. While this is permissible for short-term use, in general it is highly problematic from a copyright standpoint. See WP:UP#COPIES and Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. The content on the following subpages, to the extent it was copied from articles, does not properly attribute the original contributors of the content and, as such, violates Wikipedia's copyright policy.
Thank you, -- Black Falcon ( talk) 20:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Inasmuch as you provided some edits relevant to the discussion on inclusion of information on a PPP loan to WasteZero please feel free to weigh in on Talk:Cal_Cunningham#Information_on_PPP_loan_to_Waste_Zero.
Jjjjjjjjjj ( talk) 07:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Now that I look at it--I do see the update, but, as can be evidenced from this, as of a few days ago, the listing did show him as a Democrat. Do you think this is an extended oversight, or actual evidence of switches? Iseult Δx parlez moi 22:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi @ Nevermore27! Firstly, I just wanted to say fantastic work on Gubernatorial lines of succession in the United States. It's a fascinating and well-made article.
I also wanted to get your thoughts on adding the circumstances in which a person next in line to a governorship would succeed to become governor or acting governor in the form of using bullet points. I realise that this could be complicated, but I do think that it would add to the article. For example, for Alabama, the text could read (this is a first draft, it should include bullet points rather than asterisks and also spaces before each new sentence):
The person next in line will become governor if the governor and the people above them in the line of succession have: [1] * been removed from office * died * resigned The person next in line will gain the governor's power and authority if the governor and the people above them in the line of succession are: [2] * impeached (until they are acquitted) * absent from the state for more than twenty days (until they return) * unsound in mind (until they are restored to their mind) * otherwise disabled (until they are relieved from the other disability) The person next in line will exercise the duties of governor if the governor-elect (and, if applicable, lieutenant governor-elect): [3] * fails or refuse from any cause to qualify (until they qualify)
Let me know what you think! I was going to post this on the article's talk page, but after looking at the edit history I realised that the person who I really wanted to hear from was yourself. Thanks in advance. FollowTheTortoise ( talk) 21:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
FollowTheTortoise ( talk) 21:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
I know you weren't the one to put the name in the table, but were you able to find a source that said Henry Franklin Floyd was taking senior status? I didn't see anything on the court website and can't find a news article and it's not at uscourts.gov yet either. Snickers2686 ( talk) 01:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi there! If you're receiving this, it's because you like The West Wing—I happen to love the show, and I'm trying to set up a task force for it under Wikipedia:WikiProject Television to improve its coverage on Wikipedia. If you'd like to join, please leave your name here—hope to see you there!
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for correcting my edit on the Third Circuit. Could you let me know how you find the seat number for the judges so I know how to do so in the future? Dequanhargrove ( talk) 17:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Party shading/ICM has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
22:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Party shading/ICM Party (Virgin Islands) has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
22:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
List of Native American politicians, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Yuchitown (
talk)
20:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Yuchitown
Upcoming Indianapolis event - June 21: Wiki Loves Pride Indy | ||
---|---|---|
![]() |
You are invited to join us at IUPUI University Library for a Wiki Loves Pride editathon—hosted by IUPUI University Library, and supported by the Central Indiana Community Foundation—where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on this theme:
|
![]() |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 19:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC).)
![]() |
Upcoming Indianapolis event - July 28: Food Deserts & Food Policy | ![]() ![]() |
---|---|---|
You are invited to join us at Ruth Lilly Law Library for an edit-a-thon on Food Deserts & Food Policy hosted by Ruth Lilly Law Library and United States National Agricultural Library. Together, both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on food deserts, nutrition, and related local and federal food policy.
Visit the Wikipedia/Meetup page or Eventbrite to sign up and learn more. |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 08:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC).)
The file File:Current State Treasurers.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused. Severely outdated map. No obvious use. Up-to-date version at
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦»
14:41, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
The file File:Current United States Attorneys General.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused. Severely outdated map. No obvious use. Up-to-date version at File:Party affiliation of current United States attorneys general.svg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦»
14:41, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
The file File:Nebraska US house.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused. Low quality. Superseded by File:United States Congressional Districts in Nebraska, 2003 – 2013.tif.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦»
05:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
The file File:Nebraska US house.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused. Low quality. Superseded by File:United States Congressional Districts in Nebraska, 2003 – 2013.tif.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦»
05:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Upcoming events around Indiana - Nov. 1:
Environmental Justice editathons 2 locations: Indianapolis & Bloomington (and virtual option) |
![]() |
---|---|---|
You are invited to join us for a multi-site editathon organized by Indiana Wikimedians at IUPUI University Library in downtown Indianapolis and the Herman B Wells Library at IU Bloomington (with virtual option). Together, both experienced and new Wikipedia editors, with faculty subject matter experts, will collaboratively improve articles on environmental justice in Indiana and globally. Join us at either location or virtually!
Visit the meetup page or Eventbrite to sign up and learn more. |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 01:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC).)
Hi Nevermore27! There's no requirement that anyone edit anything, and identifying problems is still a contribution. See WP:BURDEN for some notes about that.) It also makes sense to ask after a discrepancy to first see if there wasn't a misunderstanding. In the future, maybe it's best to consider WP:CIVIL. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 20:33, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Nov. 11-13:
WikiConference North American Meetup! IUPUI University Library (and around Indianapolis) |
![]() |
---|---|---|
Registration is now open for WikiConference North America 2022 (Nov. 11–13) held jointly with Mapping USA! If you would like to experience this virtual event in-person, you are welcome to join our meetup in Indianapolis! We will be meeting at IUPUI University Library for the weekend, with AV set up for conference streaming and presenting (for those who've submitted proposals). Anyone is welcome to join, we will have some light refreshments and are planning evening activities. Feel free to join us for an activity, a day, or the whole weekend. Please let us know you are coming via the meetup page and please register for the conference. We will share more about in-person activities on the meetup page as they are finalized. Visit the WikiConference North America site for the schedule and visit our meetup page to sign up and learn more. And don't forget to register for the conference! |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 17:17, 4 November 2022 (UTC).)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Brendan. I'm reaching out to you because I noticed your active Wiki-editing and your involvement in WP:USG. I'd be grateful for your assistance with updating Adam Pritzker's article with his two new roles, including his political activism. I've posted an edit request that is still pending. Thanks for facilitating these changes and improvements. DCBPI ( talk) 14:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Upcoming Indianapolis event March 17: Indiana Women in the Arts |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|---|
You are invited to join us at Newfields for an edit-a-thon on Indiana women in the arts, co-hosted by Wikimedians of Indiana and IUPUI University Library. Together, both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on women artists and artworks of Indiana.
Visit the Wikipedia Meetup page or Eventbrite to sign up and learn more. |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 21:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC).)
Upcoming Indianapolis event - May 13: Indiana Politics & Government 2023 | ||
---|---|---|
![]() |
It's been an eventful state legislative session in Indiana, and local elections took place this week, so we have lots to cover! You are invited to The AMP at 16 Tech in Indianapolis for a Politics & Government editathon to improve write articles about local political and government topics of interest and improve information about local officials, candidates, elections, and legislation. Come join us at this fun venue, with free parking and refreshments provided!
We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Wikimedians in Indiana User Group |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 01:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC).)
Upcoming Indianapolis event - June 24, 2023: Wiki Loves Pride Indy | ||
---|---|---|
![]() |
You are invited to join us at Spades Park Branch Library for a Wiki Loves Pride editathon—hosted by the Wikimedians of Indiana User Group with support from the Central Indiana Community Foundation. Together, new and experienced Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on LGBTQ+ topics, individuals, organizations, and legislation in Indiana.
We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Wikimedians of Indiana User Group |
![]() |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 16:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC).)
Upcoming Indianapolis event - July 30, 2023: Indiana State Fair Wiknic | ||
---|---|---|
![]() |
We are partnering with the Indiana State Fair to offer FREE tickets to the fair for Wikipedians! We will be meeting on July 30th at 10am to pass out tickets and have a quick info session before we attend the fair (feel free to branch off and share your accomplishments on the Meetup page later!) Detailed instructions on how the day will go is available on the Meetup page! We hope you'll join us to edit about things related to fair (historic buildings, foods, animals, activities, and the fair itself). All levels of experience are welcome! Please RSVP so we know who is coming. We hope you'll join us!
We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Wikimedians of Indiana User Group |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 13:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC).)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
You are amazing!! Enjoy this barnstar!! KEEP IT UP! Babysharkboss2 was here!! 15:15, 3 October 2023 (UTC) |
Upcoming Indianapolis event - October 11, 2023: Indiana Under-represented Artists Edit-a-thon | ||
---|---|---|
![]() |
You are invited to Herron Art Library in Herron School of Art & Design for an Under-represented Artists of Indiana Edit-a-thon—hosted by the Wikimedians of Indiana User Group with support from the Central Indiana Community Foundation. Together, new and experienced Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on under-represented Indiana based artists and art/artist organizations and groups in Indiana today, and historically.
All levels of experience are welcome! Please RSVP so we know who is coming. We hope you'll join us!
|
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 00:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC).)"
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The file File:Indiana US house.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused, superseded by c:File:Indiana_2006_House_Map.svg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦»
03:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey! No problem. Yeah, I had a feeling the International factor was a throw-off. And I am all for variants being included. (Including honorary awards.) But imo, maybe they should be subsections underneath the primary three awards, you know? Main editors might dismiss that as "obvious". I tried to group it actually, but the bullet point vs. pound sign (for numbered bullet points) was just a mess. In any event, I myself was actually surprised that Jackson was actually younger than Plummer when she won the Tony. I thought she was like 90 tbh. RIP, what a treasure both were though! -- Cinemaniac86 Talk Stalk 23:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately this is one of the downsides of Wikipedia. I would like to understand why you are taking this personally and in such a way that 'has soured you'. All that has occurred here is the usual practices of Wikipedia. I note you did propose an original discussion, but until you made the changes the talk page was not looked at. Then a discussion ensued, which relied on the content which was added and the policies and guidelines of Wikipeida. The discussions made no contributor comments and assumed good faith at all times.
This is how Wikipedia is supposed to work. Be bold, if you are reverted or challenged, discuss. That is how Wikipedia works.
None of this is supposed to patronising, i am just confused that a veteran editor such as yourself has stated you are 'soured'.
Why are you taking this so personally? PicturePerfect666 ( talk) 17:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Thank you for all of your work on U.S. Congress pages! Marquardtika ( talk) 15:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC) |
Hello Nevermore27!
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to United States House Judiciary Subcommittee on Responsiveness and Accountability to Oversight. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. It seems that you may have added
public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as
Brian Schatz. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia
guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at
Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an
attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Please see this report for further information regarding the copyright infringement and please do not copy/paste from the internet.
https://api.ithenticate.com/en_us/dv/20220511?o=106924091&lang=en_us
MrBauer24 (
talk)
01:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Thank you for fixing the congressional committee name bolding! Marquardtika ( talk) 16:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC) |
Hi, can I ask why you (mostly) reverted my edit on National Popular Vote Interstate Compact? (You forgot to add in the note about enactment being required in performing the revert.) The bill was enacted by the House 73-72 just today (April 2nd) according to this Maine bill tracker, but you reverted my edits without explanation. Why the revert? Sniffnoy ( talk) 02:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)