![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The DaVinci Barnstar |
![]() |
Just wanted to know if you could tell me if I have ever beaten Cluebot to a vandalism revert? Thanks and please respond on my talk. TucsonDavid ( talk) 15:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC) Thanks for your help. TucsonDavid ( talk) 15:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Cobi. Thanks for adding info to the anti-vandalism bot census. You have added the User:ClueBot/Source for both ClueBots. But, is that really the ClueBot NG code? Thanks. emijrp ( talk) 12:04, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my mess :) T. Canens ( talk) 02:03, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Since you have substantial experience with vandals, I was wondering if you'd help me with a possible sock puppet conflict. I am not sure if I can properly handle it and need help with IP users on the Chinese Democracy article making the same unconstructive edit (see history)? I do not know how to handle sock puppetry properly, so is there a way to check out if 168.19.18.46, 168.18.215.120, and 72.152.152.88? The edit issue and even edit summaries are pretty conspicuous and suspect to ignore. Dan56 ( talk) 20:15, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
You may also be interested in ensuring that File:ClueNet Logo.png is licensed appropriately with permission verified. Cheers! VernoWhitney ( talk) 04:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Anti-vandalism bot operator's barnstar | |
For co-creating the ClueBot NG! For the thought and effort that has gone into creating, training, and maintaining this awesome project, especially the user interface. Thank you for keeping the WP clean(er). Keep up the great work! — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 13:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC) |
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on ClueNet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that the administrator
userfy the page or email a copy to you.
TheRealFennShysa (
talk)
18:42, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The da Vinci Barnstar | |
I'm glad ClueBot's on my side when I'm reverting vandalism. You've created a really good tool that helps a lot of people. ~ Matthew Say hi! How I've helped 21:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC) |
Cobi, sorry about last evening. I picked your brain for a good hour and then... poof, my wifi went bust. I didn't get back on until this morning. Thanks again for all of your explanations; they really helped and the whole thing was quite interesting. Maybe I'll pop in IRC later. Ocaasi ( talk) 14:53, 17 December 2010 (UTC)