This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:NYKevin/Archive_12. |
This is the user talk page for User:NYKevin/Archive 12, where you can send messages and comments to NYKevin/Archive 12. |
|
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted because: Just because! (Feel free to delete this after seeing it.) -- javier032 ( talk) 03:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
you have email. DGG ( talk ) 23:01, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
dear NYKevin. I've created the new article "Chema Rodríguez" and would indeed appreciate if you could wikify it. THANKS A LOT -- Dviaje ( talk) 17:31, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
{{
es icon}}
after the citation.
thanks!! i'm going to try and do it now -- Dviaje ( talk) 18:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
done, thanks! -- Dviaje ( talk) 18:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thanks, NYKevin!--
Dviaje (
talk)
23:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
hi NYKevin, i have a doubt: Chema Rodríguez's entry has Spanish film directors as a category, but he's not linked to this list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Spanish_film_directors
how can I solve it? thanks a lot -- Dviaje ( talk) 20:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
sorry, he does appear, in C not in R, but there he is -- Dviaje ( talk) 20:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thanks for the help and the info, i keep on learning thanks to you :) --
Dviaje (
talk)
21:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi there NYKevin!. I've noticed that you've requested an editor review, located here. While it is not required, users that request a review are strongly encouraged to review other users, as this greatly helps with the backlog of requests there. Think of it as a mutual effort, you review someone and someone will review you. So if it's not too much to ask, please consider reviewing someone (the person before you would be fine - if he's already been reviewed, just look for someone that hasn't). I understand that you may not feel qualified or know how to review someone, so there are instructions in the Instructions for reviewers tab at the top of the page. As always, feel free to message me if you have any questions. Netalarm talk 06:29, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Kevin. I'm curious. I can't see what
this edit does - although I've read up on {{
clearright}}
. Have you time to educate me / us? Thanks,
Trafford09 (
talk)
11:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Ah - I think I see. Thank you. Trafford09 ( talk) 18:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
I would like to invite you to make a public disputation of the substance of my essay "What Wikipedia Is" on its talk page. I'm just glad it's getting some notice, since the ideas it contains are important and need to be publicly and openly discussed. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!: 16-0 and Super Bowl XLIV Champions) 16:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Heya,
Reverted and sourced the first/fifth amendment claims, they were easily sourced via reliable primary and secondary sources, but perhaps I've missed your concern. The 5th amendment issue relates to due process which incorporates ideas that we often think of as equal protection, that's how it's relevant legally (or at least so the ruling claims.) Feel free to drop me a note if you have any questions, no harm intended. Have a great weekend! -- j⚛e decker talk 22:17, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Could you please revisit Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/working/Summary of Evidence memos/pg112. I believe that your opinion there was based on an incorrect impression you may have gotten from an earlier post by another editor, and is not actually reflecting anything Geo Swan said or indicated. I would appreciate it if you looked at the full discussion and arguments again, and check whether your opinion actaully reflects the facts in this case. Fram ( talk) 20:58, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Kevin, just wanted to let you know that I have done a review at the link above. Regards, Jujutacular talk 05:39, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message. Your
editor review is scheduled to be closed on 21 December 2010 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive-->
to the review page will prevent further automated actions.
AnomieBOT
⚡
05:53, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |