Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been
reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a
warning or blocking template. Please use the
user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Those edits were not
vandalism.
Remsense诉05:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Your signature
Hello NXcrypto. May i suggest that your signature as i currently find it is perhaps not in line with
WP:CUSTOMSIG in that it is not at all easy to work out your username because of all the flecks all the way around it. Perhaps you'd consider making it a little simpler? Happy days, ~ LindsayHello07:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Looks good :) I noticed that in your welcomes you have welcomed several users who are blocked; now i haven't looked to see which came first (block or welcome), but either way seems as though it is a bit of a slap in the face ~ as well as your action being essentially pointless. Maybe check that new users are actually making useful edits before you welcome them? Or, if not, undo their edit(s) and explain why, as you can see i did with user:Malevolence96. So, what are you interested in editing? Don't just be a welcomer but an actual editor, eh? Happy days, ~ LindsayHello08:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
LindsayH Yes, indeed, that was a mistake on my part. I inadvertently extended a welcome to some members who had previously been blocked. However, I have since rectified this oversight and am now only extending greetings to newly registered members. You can clearly observe this improvement in my most recent 50 edits. Moreover, I am also interested in reverting vandalism, which I have been actively working on for the past two weeks. However, I also find being a member of the welcoming community enjoyable and rewarding. Best Regard.
NxcryptoMessage08:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Most Wikipedia articles include citations for native names. If not provided, anyone can challenge and remove such information. Please refrain from engaging in POV pushing.
NxcryptoMessage08:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Could you please specify what you meant by "most" in number? Because even native name in articles of notable subjects don't have inline citation. That's why I was confused when you argued that native names should be sourced.
Desertasad (
talk)
13:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
And, you added the inline citation next to native name in the first paragraph, while previously you removed native name in the infobox instead. If your reason for that was purely because of the need of reliable source, you should have removed one in the first paragraph as well.
Desertasad (
talk)
13:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply