Major subsidiaries moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Major subsidiaries, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Josey Wales
Parley
09:28, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello NECHQ,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Major subsidiaries for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Dewritech ( talk) 11:56, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, NECHQ,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoubleGrazing, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Major subsidiaries, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoubleGrazing}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
DoubleGrazing ( talk) 13:06, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello NECHQ. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:NECHQ. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=NECHQ|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
13:08, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search
Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the
username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
- Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ~
ONUnicorn(
Talk|
Contribs)
problem solving
14:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
NECHQ ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
am really sorry for the mistake and i do understand what i must do to fix
Decline reason:
This addresses none of the problems. Yamla ( talk) 09:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
NECHQ ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
One open request at a time please ... and we greatly prefer the ones where you state a reason. — Daniel Case ( talk) 06:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock reviewed|reason=Am sorry for what I did but it was not my intention to make the promotional page. I was editing my page for my people to see. I kindly request for your forgiveness and it won't happen again please NECHQ ( talk) 16:32, 17 October 2022 (UTC)|decline=You have not proposed a new username as instructed. You will need to tell us what edits you will make instead of inapprorpriate ones.
You now have seven (!!!) open unblock requests. This is wildly abusive and indicates you lack sufficient competence to edit here. Which single one open unblock request do you wish to be reviewed? Please demonstrate you are capable of adhering to WP:CIR by removing all open unblock requests except for the one you wish to be reviewed. Ensure you leave all declined unblock requests in place. -- Yamla ( talk) 10:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'll also note that "i would want to make meaningful edits on my page" is a complete non-starter, as you have been told over and over again. If this is your only goal, this is the end of the line. -- Yamla ( talk) 10:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
NECHQ ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My proposed new username is Talemwa256. I have learnt my lesson and will longer make promotional information on my page. I promise i will never do it again. I really did learn my mistake and sorry for that. Am a person who learn lessons from my mistakes, what i did was bad. Please forgive me and accept my apologies. Kindly give me more chances to be on Wikipedia again. I do appreciate your forgiveness. NECHQ ( talk) 08:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No answer to the question below. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 18:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What do you plan to write about, now that you know you won't be unblocked to write about National Enterprise Corporation or Draft:Major subsidiaries? How specifically will you comply with WP:COI? Hint: this requires specific actions before you edit further and if you can't explain the specific action you'll take, there's zero chance you'll be unblocked. -- Yamla ( talk) 09:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
NECHQ ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Am the ict manager for NEC and in charge of updating company info on our website. but i got to know that google does not pick the updates as soon as they are posted on our site(nec.go.ug) we are not posting information to advertise NEC . BUT WE WANT THE PUBLIC TO GET CORRECT INFO ABOUT NEC. and promise to follow the rules NECHQ ( talk) 14:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have failed to declare as a paid editor as required by the Terms of Use, see WP:PAID. You say you are not here to advertise, and then go on to give the definition of advertising. The proper place for you to give information about your company is on your company website and social media. If you have issues with Google displaying information from your company, you need to contact Google. Since you don't intend to contribute to areas of the encyclopedia unrelated to your company, nor have you proposed a new username, this is the end of the line. 331dot ( talk) 18:05, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Concern regarding Draft:Major subsidiaries
Hello, NECHQ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Major subsidiaries, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)