Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hello, MusicGene!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne(talk)21:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
None of the sources are reliable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
What is considered a reliable source? i thought the sites i referenced were secondary, and independents and some were directly from the record label?
MusicGene (
talk)
23:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
Please take the time to read through all the above links. As noted before none of the sources are reliable which means they should not be used (remove them), this includes Buzz (no evidence of editorial oversight, etc.). Generally, for an album to meet the notability multiple in-depth reviews by reputable sources are needed. See
WP:WikiProject Albums/Sources to get an idea of some acceptable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NoobThreePointOh was:
This looked fine, until I scrolled down to the references and saw the code error.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:The Prophecy (album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
YouTube is almost never a reliable sources (see
WP:RSPYT) nor are social media sites like Facebook, Instragram, etc. so please stop using them. Student newspapers cannot be used to establish notability (see
WP:RSSM...audience is too local).
S0091 (
talk)
22:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)reply
If a source is not reliable it can't be used to support any anything. If a source is a
primary source (i.e. the label, anyone affiliated, interviews) it can be used to support very basic facts, such as a release date but should only be used very sparingly and does not contribute to notability. Think of this way, if something is important/of note, reputable
secondary sources with no affiliation will write about it own their own with no or little input from those involved. If multiple reliable, secondary sources that are
independent have not written about a topic, then an article is not possible because largely what Wikipedia article should do is summarize those sources.
S0091 (
talk)
23:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Also feel free to look at all the other NSP discography or 4(The Pink Album) by Lukas Graham who have only 3 cites, yet they are still on there...
MusicGene (
talk)
23:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)reply
I am not familiar, but looking at the sources it was ranked #56 on Germany's official national chart which is an indication of notability (see
WP:CHART), similar to the Billboard top 100 but also see
WP:OTHERSTUFF. The existence of one article has not bearing on another article (notability guidelines change over time, there are plenty of existing articles that do not meet today's guidelines, etc.). If any albums you have proposed has made it to the Billboard top 100, then that is an indication of notability. Do read
WP:NALBUM.
S0091 (
talk)
23:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:The Prophecy (album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its
talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself without posting a request to
Articles for creation.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Stage (Jesse McCartney album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Hello, MusicGene. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:The Decca Studio Albums Collection, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can
request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, MusicGene. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:The Prophecy (album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can
request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Twist & Shout and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Your edit to
A Flea in Her Ear (film) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's
copyright policy. —
Diannaa (
talk)
13:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)reply