This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
We all did our part, now we take it to FA. I will file a peer review request in a few minutes, cheers! - 凶 13:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey Mtmelendez, how you doing, in regards to the description of the exotic and unique Red Sealing Wax Palm found at the "entrance" of the Botanical Gardens:
Frankly, i much prefer the well placed words of the top description; it makes people think, it grabs folks "virtually", it stimulates the mind and the imagination, it creates essence and makes people read article, it's there for a reason, furthermore, it describes the "striking feature of a red crown shaft", important feature of this unique, strikingly unusual species, personally have one of these and believe me, this detail astonishes folks, … what should we do – Moebiusuibeom-en 19:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, but remember that the article is about the Botanical garden, not about the whole subject of Botany. You may want to start an article on Botany in Puerto Rico, and merge info on the Botanical Garden as well as UPR studies on botany, and the flora of Puerto Rico. It's a big task, but it could be a great article. - Mtmelendez
RE: Sorry, too much and I'm not an expert in Botany, although the seed could be planted and from there who knows, my interests are environmental issues, culture, design & urbanism (a world for people, not machines), the San Juan Botanical Garden article so far is one of the best I've seen, I don't think we want to get too technical, there's a whole lot of subjects in Puerto Rico that need to be addressed, there is priorities, we must let the world know who we are and where we stand, I'm not a great writer, i just fill in the facts and realities, the rest of America and the world is on agenda, I'm just passing by, Cheers, MOEBIUS – Moebiusuibeom-en 00:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Send me your e-mail address. I heard that Senador K. McClintock spoke about me in his Memorial Day Speech. Tony the Marine 19:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
I have added an option to show when an article has been selected on the PR portal. This eliminates the need for the template you created. Joelito ( talk) 18:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I figured that was how it should have been done, either way it seems WikiProject Caribbean is disturbingly inactive. About the portal do you think we should add sports related news, I can be of help updating those and this year is full of important events such as the Panamerican games and the Fiba Pre-Olympic, and I will cut my arm off if our Basketball team doesn't bring a medal back from them because Manolo is finally shaping it as it should have been for the World Chapionships. - 凶 02:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey, where you've been, have you seen the latest changes in San Juan, Puerto Rico, please comment! ~ Moebiusuibeom-en 15:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I just updated the In the news... section of Portal:Puerto_Rico. I hope you don't mind! Yours truly, Eddie 23:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Consider to include this link to the Puerto Rico page: http://www.directoriodeempresas.net/prhotels.html VictorFRodriguez 17:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Silly question, some time ago after attemping to read this page I did some massive cleanup and have since then attempted to mantain it clean, as I usually do when I fix a article. Now ever since back then I have been wondering if we should add it to the project's scope since we created it or if the creature has any chance of being real, 'reported it'. What do you think? - 凶 03:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey Mtmelendez, I've messed up San Juan, Puerto Rico, sorry, was trying to place Arts & Culture image in it's correct positioning, (originally didn't want it to overlap transportation area) and it seems I've lost part of info and don't know how to reverse, please help ~ Moebiusuibeom-en 15:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Politics rule 22:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
The
Wikipedia Birthday Committee is proud to wish you a very happy birthday. |
On your day, I wish for you I wish you fine and simple pleasures. Happy birthday, dear Mtmelendez! |
Hey those are great news, I will not have much time to edit it now but I already added it to my watch list and should be able to keep a close eye on it, oh and kind of late but...happy birthday! :p - 凶 21:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I am thinking about starting a monthly newsletter for the members of Wikiproject Puerto Rico. It will include the latest news and information about the project. It will be delivered by a bot, probably R Delivery Bot or HermesBot. I have created a draft that can be found here. Please let me know how I can improve it. Thank you. Happy editing! Yours sincerely, E ddie 01:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Comment
You guys have done a wonderful job with San Juan, Puerto Rico and make me proud. I made some minor corrections, but feel free to revert me if you feel I am wrong. I would like to make two minor suggestions, which you may consider.
1. Include something about Rafael Cordero (educator)
2. and maybe San Juan's role in the World War's since Camp Las Casa's was situated in what is now "El Caserio Las Casa" see: Puerto Ricans in World War II and since the "first" shot in World War I on behave of the "Americans" was made in San Juan by Puerto Rican Teofilo Marxuach.
Those are only suggestions. Now, if were up to me, I would include a "table" with the mayors of the city and at least mention Felisa Rincón de Gautier who was the first woman to be elected as the mayor of a capital city in any of The Americas. Tony the Marine 19:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
The
WikiProject Puerto Rico Newsletter Year I - Issue 1 - June 2007 | |
| |
|
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for
WikiProject Puerto Rico. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, please contact
User talk:Boricuaeddie. This newsletter was delivered by the automated
R Delivery Bot
18:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC) .
This user has a clear agenda which does not improve Puerto Rico related articles. We should continue reverting his edits and inform him that he is not doing any improvements to the articles. Joelito ( talk) 21:31, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Mtmelendez! As you may know already, WikiProject Puerto Rico, in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, is trying to assess the quality of articles within our scope to help us focus our work on the articles who need it the most. Unfortunately, there is a backlog of more than 799 unassessed articles within our scope. I, in the name of the members of WikiProject Puerto Rico, ask you, if you have the time, to help your fellow members clean up the backlog by assessing unassessed articles and review articles already assessed to make sure they still meet the quality criteria. You can learn more about the WikiProject's article assessment program at Wikipedia:WikiProject Puerto Rico/Assessment.
I, personally, found assessing articles manually took too much time, so I looked around and found a script that makes assessing articles easier. If you would like the script's help, just copy the following code to your monobook.js.
// [[User:Outriggr/metadatatest.js]] importScript('User:Outriggr/metadatatest.js'); assessmentMyTemplateCode = ["{{PuertoRicoproj|class=|importance=}}"];
You can find the manual for the script at User talk:Outriggr/metadatatest.js. If you need help, please contact me. Thank you for your time. I hope you can find the time to help. This message has been automatically delivered to all WikiProject Puerto Rico participants using AWB. Happy editing! Yours sincerely, E ddie 17:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for this. E ddie 11:56, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm unfamiliar with the process, but it appears as though every single wikipedia entry that USED to have the correct wiki link to Hits got screwed up into the disambiguation of Hits, all at once. Now it appears as though you're fixing every single one of these back to where it's supposed to be manually!?
What happened? Who screwed up tens of thousdands of links in an instant? I'm very confused as to how this site is run, but I think there's still thousands of other players that have messed up links now due to someone's actions. SashaNein 15:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Please check the data on public housing project listings. Hope it helps. Pr4ever 01:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
It was provided as cut-and-paste by a source within the Housing Department. I'll try and get an address for the source document.
Pr4ever
03:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
As I mentioned in July it was provided by someone within the PR Housing Dept. I forgot to follow up, my apologies. I'll try to source it soon and get back to you. Pr4ever 03:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't we change the name of "In the news..." to "Puerto Rico News" like Portal:Illinois, a featured portal candidate? -- Boricuaeddie hábleme 18:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
File:Escudo de Puerto Rico.jpg Happy Day of the Constitution! Happy editing! Yours sincerely, Boricua e ddie 00:38, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
The
WikiProject Puerto Rico Newsletter Year I - Issue 2 - July 2007 | |
| |
Hello, Mtmelendez. This is the second issue of
WikiProject Puerto Rico's newsletter. The newsletter is intended to help all members to keep up with the latest news relating to the project. Please help with the newsletter by suggesting content to be included on the newsletter by leaving a message on
my talk page. Enjoy! |
|
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for
WikiProject Puerto Rico. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, please contact
Boricuaeddie. This newsletter was delivered by the automated
Animum Delivery Bot
21:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC) .
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{ inactive}} and/or {{ historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Just a heads up that Andrew Saul (ex-CEO of Cache and Brooks Bros.) has been nominated for featured article status here. Any input, comment and suggestions would be greatly appreciated, there is not that much info on him as it relates to his business career, and being an !expert, I'm not quite sure how well I can flesh it out. Please feel free to comment and/or improve the article. Thanks! Mrprada911 21:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey Marcos, I see both Ramón Emeterio Betances and Héctor Lavoe have only received automated reviews there, I am moving Lavoe to FAC, perhaps we can nominate both at the same time so we can monitor them at the same time, what do you think? - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
To all my friends,
As you all know by now, the article "Puerto Ricans in NASA" was deleted and we must accept the decision of the closing administrator I my self am not upset because I know that together we came come up with an acceptable alternative and I encourage all of you to join me in this quest.The creation of a well written list seems like a good idea and therefore you are all more then welcome to use the contents of the original article, which the closing admin. was kind enough to store here: User:Marine 69-71/Puerto Ricans in NASA as its foundation base. Not only do we owe it the Puerto Ricans who have made great contributions to the Space Program, but to our children and people who may someday be inspired by said article.
I admit that I was disappointed that consensus was ignored, but what worries me the most is that this may become a trend for the deletionists who, in some cases, may have anti-Hispanic sentiments, however it is all water under the bridge now. I have already started witting the bios of our scientists in NASA, which can be used in any future project. we may have lost a battle, but not the war. Que Dios me lo Bendiga a todos. Tony the Marine 20:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Demf was definitely right when he said that he took it beyond GA, we only did some moderate fixes and now the project has another FA, thanks for your support when I suggested bringing them to FAC now lets cross our fingers and hope that Lavoe gets promoted to. - Caribbean~H.Q. 20:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, man! We're on fire today :-) -- Boricua e ddie 21:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm a little confused. User: Entre-Nos says that unless you are born in Puerto Rico, you are not Puerto Rican. This is not a debate, just a discussion. I would like to know the answer to this, here:[ [2]] Tony the Marine 02:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
The
WikiProject Puerto Rico Newsletter Year I - Issue 2 - August 2007 | |
| |
Hello, Mtmelendez. This is the third issue of
WikiProject Puerto Rico's newsletter. The newsletter is intended to help all members to keep up with the latest news relating to the project. Please help with the newsletter by suggesting content to be included on the newsletter by leaving a message on
my talk page. Enjoy! |
|
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for
WikiProject Puerto Rico. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, please contact
Boricuaeddie. This newsletter was delivered by the automated
R Delivery Bot
03:22, 1 September 2007 (UTC) .
Seeing as you're a participant in WikiProject Puerto Rico, I wish to invite you to participate in the survey at Talk:Benicio Del Toro on whether the article on Benicio del Toro should be moved from Benicio Del Toro to Benicio del Toro. Timeineurope 14:59, 2 September 2007 (UTC) I, Tony the Marine, present the group of User:Demf, User:Boricuaeddie, User:Mtmelendez, User:Caribbean H.Q. with the thrid presentation of the "Puerto Rican National Merit Medal" for their outsanding work as a group on the Ramón Emeterio Betances article. As a group you have met the criteria of having a featured article and as individuals you all have contributed to numerous Puerto Rico related articles. Felicidades. Tony the Marine 03:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
I sent Demf an e-mail letting him know about the Betances FA. Tony the Marine 05:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you! It was a bit of a pain. :) I saw that you had done some extensive work on it yourself a few days ago. It's pretty satisfying to knock something off of the "to do" list. I'm currently circling some of the others on Category:Wikify from December 2006, but, of course, only the hard ones are left. :) -- Moonriddengirl 18:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
I noticed a significant spelling error in your "auditor 2" userbox ( User:Mtmelendez/Userboxes/auditor 2) where you spelled "bookkeeping" as "bookeeping". I don't know how to fix a userbox or else I would. I liked your selection of userboxes and will definitely use some for my page. Nice work. -- Mtjaws 03:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
That's OK — mix-ups happen.-- Esprit15d 14:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
The nomination passed, thanks for your support on this RFA and for all the help you have given me during my time here, when you think the Portal is ready for Featured candidature let me know so I can help get it to FP, cuidate. - Caribbean~H.Q. 23:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I indented your struck neutral to not show up as double !vote. — [ aldebaer ] 00:53, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
hi there, thanks for the editing - living in the UK I dont have much time for the vagaries of US copyright law, and even so I believe wikipeida has it wrong on 'fair use' images on userboxes - if used on pages themselves, why not?
you have, however, made an error with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jw2034/Hatfield. This is a GNU licenced image, thus may be used in this case. I've undone your edit on this, please be more careful in future. thanks.
- Jw2034 23:38, 15 Sept 2007 (BST)
Dearest Mtmelendez,
Thank you for your participation in
my RFA, which closed successfully with 96 supports, 1 oppose, and 3 neutrals. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm a new admin remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them. I would like to give a special shout out to
Hirohisat,
Wizardman, and
Husond, for there original co-nominations. Thank you once again and good day.
This RFA thanks was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunatly this is not entirely my own design.
Its alive !!! I think the time to nominate this portal for featured portal has come, I would do it myself but you are the one that has worked countless hours on it, based on the review the things remaining are related to format and not content (exept the reviewer wants the "News" section gone) so I would say the chances of it pasing are good. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your support at my RfA. Regards, Jogers ( talk) 09:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Great work! WT:RFD doesn't seem very high-traffic from my experience, but leaving a note there is a good idea. The 5-10 at a time seems like a good idea, as well. -- MZMcBride 22:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for editing the userbox i've made which was a bit inappropriate. BritandBeyonce 06:22, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your work at the List of Taínos article. As I mentioned at Tony's talk page, I think it should be moved to List of caciques, or something of the sort, as only one person in the list is not a cacique. What do you think? -- Ag ü eybaná 20:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry. I didn't realize it had already been nominated for deletion, since I couldn't find the first one (probably me making a tiny unnoticeable typo in the URL or something), and I was playing around with WP:TW's auto-AfD function, so all of that combined ended up making the AfD, which unfortunately there's no "I TAKE IT BACK!" for that, at least not to my knowledge. Anyway, I'm hoping someone will just WP:SNOW the AfD soon so it can go away, it's very embarrassing for me. Anyway, your mistake was a smaller one then mine, and don't worry about it, it's an easy one to make. -- HAL talk 01:41, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Replied here. Arman Aziz 03:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
am i doing wrong in the page? I think not. BritandBeyonce 08:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Dear Mtmelendez,
Thank you for your participation in
my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on
my talk page. Special thanks to
Walton
One and
Dihydrogen
Monoxide for nominating me.
This design was brazenly stolen from inspired by
Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor's RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by
Phaedriel's RFA thanks.
In a recent RfD, you said that a redirect's "usefulness is assumed and not required to be proven". That's not quite true. The guideline says that nearly any assertion of usefulness should be accepted, but definitely stops short of claiming that usefulness should be assumed. Someone still has to assert it. Note that we even have a speedy deletion criterion ( WP:CSD#R3) for certain types of useless redirects (recently created implausible typos and misnomers). Xtifr tälk 00:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I will work my part, just added it to my watchlist, good luck to us. - Caribbean~H.Q. 04:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words. I'm not sure I would consider myself "expert" - I've just been around long enough to remember the debates that went into the creation of the "delete if"/"keep if" guidelines.
You asked specifically about age as an indicator. I was taught that Wikipedia values history and that we ought to keep the vast majority of good-faith redirects regardless of age.
That last point is a factor that I believe is widely misunderstood. Many people think they are doing something good for the project by "cleaning up the unnecessary redirects". Even if it does no harm, it has no benefit either. At the risk of sounding trite, redirects really are that cheap.
Re-reading your question, I now wonder if I may have misread your intent. I answered the question "do old links ever stop being useful" to which I believe the answer is "no". Were you instead trying to ask "when do new links start becoming useful"? If so, the policy implies "immediately". My presumption is that the editor would not have created the redirect if he/she didn't think it was useful. Remember that not everyone navigates through pages the way you do. What's useful to you could be completely obscure to me - and vice versa. Links that are made in bad-faith or which are potentially confusing or harmful should be deleted. But links which are "useless" strikes me as an unmanageable deletion criterion. Since we can't know how everyone uses the encyclopedia, we can never prove the negative.
All that said, redirects that are younger than a few months (that were not created as a result of a pagemove) are unlikely to be in high use in my opinion. When the pagehistory shows that to be the case, I almost always support the deletion nomination (though I rarely bother to comment on those since I have nothing to add to the discussion). Cross-namespace redirects created since the creation of the different namespaces can usually be cleaned up without confusion - though in the case of redirects to policy pages, I rarely see the point. It's awfully hard to confuse "Wikipedia Deletion Policy" with anything but the project's policy page.
Those are a few of my thoughts on redirects. I hope some of it is a little bit helpful. By the way, I think your shortcuts were an excellent idea. Thanks for doing that. Rossami (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you adding this on recent subpages of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log (and maybe on older ones; I haven't checked). This is something that's been needed for awhile, so thanks for doing it. The main reason I'm sending you a message is that I would have started doing this myself if I could find this template anywhere. I've searched; I haven't found it. If you could enlighten me as to what the name is, I would be very grateful. Incidental point: it might also be useful to add it to {{ Rfd starter}}; then there wouldn't be quite as much need for manual updating (though unfortunately there would still be some). Mostly, though, I'd like to know where that template is; it's really annoying me that I don't know ... — Gavia immer (talk) 14:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
I've sent you one :-) -- Ag ü eybaná 00:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, my user page says that I am blocked. I was adding the userpage tag when it happened. Did I did something wrong? Gracias
Hi, my user page says that I am blocked. I was adding the userpage tag when it happened. Did I did something wrong? Gracias -- MissCurie 12:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
-- Ag ü eybaná 21:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi I was kidding about the best editor thing but why does the tool thing show me at 30,000 edits -45,000 in total when the wikiepdians by number of edits and my preferences shows me at 80,000? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 15:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Why does this Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits but me in the 80,000 range. According to my own edit count I've made 81,000 edits. Now why does the tool only show 30,000 mainspace. Shouldn't these lists be calculated from this? I am telling I haven't put in 80,000 detailed edits to wikipedia -not evne a tenth of that ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 15:47, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I talk a lot to other users and mess about with templates and images a lot and do a lot of tagging which rockets (pardon the Blofeld reference) my edit count. The total of 30,000 main space would be about right but I guarantee I probably haven't even put in 10,000 detailed edits to wikipedia. Many are minor edits - it is so high primarily because I have genereated tons of geo articles like a bot and have been creating a list of films which requires repetitive edits. The 80,000 in the lis tof wikipedians by numbe rof edits is ridiculous. Shouldn't this list be compiled by mainspace edits only?? My kitty Mr Bigglesworth meooows at you ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 15:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Mmmm that puts it over 35,000 edits out. Thats odd. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 16:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey check out my main page - I have this as my main page set my default as I dislike the current one which is boring Wikipedia:Main Page of Blofeld ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 16:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
There is a new user on en.Wiktionary with your username. I don't think it is really you. Could you confirm please. (User:SemperBlotto) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knaggs ( talk • contribs) 16:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Your RfA is looking really good. I think that you got more votes in 24 hours then I did in one week (smile). Tony the Marine 21:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
The
WikiProject Puerto Rico Newsletter Year I - Issue 4 - September 2007 | |
| |
Hello, Mtmelendez. This is the fourth issue of WikiProject Puerto Rico's newsletter. The newsletter is intended to help all members to keep up with the latest news relating to the project. Please help with the newsletter by suggesting content to be included on the newsletter by leaving a message on my talk page. Enjoy! -- Ag ü eybaná 16:52, 30 September 2007 (UTC) | |
I would like to pay a small tribute in this edition to Tony "the Marine". Editing since May 24, 2004, he has been one of our project's most active editors and has become one of Wikipedia's most recognized writers. He has authored over 400 articles, including 4 Featured Articles, 1 Featured List, 10 Good Articles, and 28 DYKs. His name has appeared in newspapers and magazines and has been mentioned by politicians and artists. He has brought Puerto Rico's history and its people to the web. He has shown the world that Puerto Ricans have done much more than just be gangsters and drug dealers. He has shown the world that we have contributed to history and the world just as much as any other group of people. On September 29, 2007, Tony announced that we would not be writing for Wikipedia anymore. We, the members of this project, are sad that he will not be able to continue to spread the word of Hispanics' contributions here on the web, but I, for one, feel honored that he has entrusted us with the duty of continuing and improving his excellent work. Tony, rest assured that your contributions, your wisdom, and the help you provided to all of us when we were new users will be remembered for generations. Que Dios te bendiga, Tony, y que tu recompensa sea grande en el Reino de los Cielos. Viva Puerto Rico libre. — Ag ü eybaná 16:52, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for
WikiProject Puerto Rico. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, please contact
Boricuaeddie. This newsletter was delivered by the automated
R Delivery Bot
17:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC) .
Well unless something goes terribly wrong you are going to pass RFA in less than an hour with unanimous support. Naturally it will take some time to get entirely familiar with the tools so I recommend taking a quick browse to the new admin school to help you fasten this process. One last thing, since Eddie will award you the traditional admin-ship soon you need the official sysop uniform beforehand, congrats! - Caribbean~H.Q. 03:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Welocme to the club. Estoy muy orgulloso de ti y orgulloso de ser tu amigo. I know that you will be a great admin. Que Dios te bendiga. Tony the Marine 04:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Ahora eres un admin en la Wikipedia inglés. Make sure to spend some more time on the admin reading list and be conservative with your shiny new tools. For example, it's better to de-escalate than block, if possible. Keep up the good work, and again, congratulations. And sorry I wasn't sure if enhorabuena was a commonly used word in Puerto Rico. I figured you'd get the intent. :) - Taxman Talk 04:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Sorry for not having replied earlier (I haven't spent much time doing bot work at the moment)... yes, Zorglbot can probably be used to update the RFD pages. Has it been discussed already or is it only an idea for now ? Schutz 12:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Can I reply comments more than once in the RFD discussions? David Pro 19:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Your comments are well founded, I don't mind them at all. As a matter of fact I mayself have stated that I no longer care weather it is de-listed or not. If you take a look at the Talk page of the article, I have taken care of the concerns posted, just to make it a bettter article, regardless if it stays GA nor not. My only concern is that I do not like the Anti-Hispanic sentiment stated by some. I don't care if it is delisted as long as it because it failed GA criteria and not because of the racial issue. After it is de-listed, I do not wish to have any of the articles which I have created nominated for anything and that includes FLC. I'am tired of all the racial shit that's going on in Wikipedia and I am not going to tolerate it. Que Dios te bendiga. Tony the Marine 05:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)