![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with Mrjulesd. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - ... (up to 100) |
Mrjulesd,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–
Davey2010
Talk
00:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Over at Wikibooks you rejected -- without explanation -- my edit here. Did you actually read it? I changed "However, new evidence suggests that the Maori were a group of mainland Maori who migrated from New Zealand to the Chatham Islands..." to "However, new evidence suggests that the Moriori were a group of mainland Maori who migrated from New Zealand to the Chatham Islands...". The former basically says Maori were Maori. The latter says Moriori developed from Maori from NZ. That's the actual point or the sentence. Moriori ( talk) 21:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your edit; I feel that the Template reorg made by you is accurate. I strongly apologise to bother you, but I would like to know your opinnion. What do you think about changing transposon → transposable element? Recently, I have read the discussion on the article's Talk page; there are arguments that the latter should rather be used when referring to transposons. If so, please feel free to correct it in the Template. Thanks, -- Jojnee ( talk) 10:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi again. I would like to ask you for an opinnion on proposed expanding the Protocell entry with models of protocells (for further reading). There are several models, and only some of them gained support within scientific community. I feel there is no need (in fact, even such possibility seems unreal) to include all of them. Thus, I am thinking about a proper way to proceed while not mislead readers these are the complete list of artificial models. My current proposition is: (deleted). The sources I used include (but are not limited to):
1. S. C. Rastogi (2006), Cell And Molecular Biology, pp. 547-548;
2. Dean Kenyon, Arie Nissenbaum (1976), Melanoidin and aldocyanoin microspheres: Implications for chemical evolution and early precambrian micropaleontology, Journal of Molecular Evolution 7(3):245-51;
3. Salehi-Reyhani, Ali; Ces, Oscar; Elani, Yuval (2017). Artificial cell mimics as simplified models for the study of cell biology, Experimental Biology and Medicine 242 (13): 1309–1317;
4. María de los Ángeles Gama Fuertes (2007), Biologia 1 - Sep"un Enfoque Constructivista", Tom 1, pp. 77-78;
5. Caren, Linda D.; Ponnamperuma, Cyril (1967). A review of some experiments on the synthesis of 'Jeewanu' (PDF). NASA Technical Memorandum X-1439. Moffett Field, California: Ames Research Center.
Thanks for help, --
Jojnee (
talk)
11:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Norseman (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:07, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I apologise for bothering you once again, but I don’t see anyone who I could discuss the subject with, especially you’re an experienced user (and a very nice person, too). Hope you don’t mind it. Recently, I’ve probably found a small error. According to the template, satellites contain two satellite viruses groups: ssRNA satellite viruses and dsDNA satellite viruses (or "virophages"), while a new update of the Satellite (biology) article mentioned the third group—ssDNA satellite viruses (i.e. 2 species within the genus Dependoparvovirus). I haven’t got enough knowledge of the topic, so I decided to ask about it. It’s not a very significant mistake, and basically rather a matter of listing completness. Thanks a lot in advance. Greetings, — Jojnee ( talk) 20:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Since the original creator of the template slightly changed its scope and title (to include only Life and—a bit vague category, I think—"Non-cellular life"), I just decided to retrieve the previous concept and recreate it as a new template (e.g. to avoid any potential edit wars). I tried my best to do so, especially because I strongly feel it can be useful for readers and has its potential as a navibox. I hope that you share my feelings on this matter. If you want, please feel free to make use of the template (perhaps it could be added to some articles or so?). Either way, thank you once again for all your support, I appreciate it. :) Have a nice day! -- Jojnee ( talk) 23:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Jules, I made some minor changes in Template:Self-replicating organic structures. The only thing I’m thinking about is to remove any re-colors. In the original version, it seemed reasonable to distinguish some entries ("Life dependent", "Virus dependent"), but currently it feels completely random, I guess. What do you think? Thank you for all your support and cooperation, I strongly appreciate it. Cheers, -- Jojnee ( talk) 10:30, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
your edit of 17:45, 11 May 2020 of
Help:Wikitext resulted in a
Stripped tag lint error for </pre>
. Copying into
Special:ExpandTemplates the block
{{markup|title={{tag|pre|o}} with <nowiki><includeonly></includeonly></nowiki> example
|<nowiki><pre<includeonly></includeonly>><!--Comment-->
[[wiki]] markup &amp;</pre></nowiki>
|<pre<includeonly></includeonly>><!--Comment-->
[[wiki]] markup &<!-- </pre> -->
}}
The <includeonly></includeonly>
markup stays in, so the pre tag isn't seen as a pre tag, so its closing tag is flagged as stripped.
I'm wondering if your markup is really correct or if it works in spite of being wrong. You probably understand this better than I do. It is not normal for proper markup to generate lint errors, although it does happen sometimes.
For more about lint errors, please check out WP:Linter. You may find the lintHint tool to be essential to dealing with lint errors. — Anomalocaris ( talk) 04:27, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
<pre<includeonly></includeonly>
at the beginning; also see
wikibooks:Template:Pre and many others. Since this is something that could be very helpful to people I think it should stay; the markup does work and is used in many templates on multiple wikimedia projects, so is unlikely to be problematic.
--Jules
(Mrjulesd)
10:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)You have no wikis in which you meet the requirements for UTRS. Your account has been removed and you will be required to reregister once you meet the requirements. If you are blocked on any wiki that UTRS uses, please resolve that before registering agian also. -- DQB ( owner / report) 08:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your recent edits in Template:Repeated sequence, it’s an obvious improvement. If you don’t mind, I’d like to discuss the following topic… It seems reasonable to make the Tandem repeat article’s scope more clear for readers, i.e., it shouldn’t be confused with the "tandemly arrayed genes". Basically, tandem repeats mean "satellite" sequences (Satellite DNA, minisatellites, microsatellites…), whereas "tandem genes" are, for example, rDNA genes. The difference is well described in a Nature article. I’m thinking about a solution, either expanding the article’s name, e.g. "Tandem repeat (Satellite sequence)", or adding a clarifying footnote above the introduction(?). I would be interested in your opinnion. Thanks a lot! -- Jojnee ( talk) 20:00, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eukaryote, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cell ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:15, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Afroasiatic languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Semitic.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
I am new to Wikipedia could you please tell me how to edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KING giner ( talk • contribs) 19:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas Mrjulesd |
Hi Mrjulesd, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas |
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |