Merhaba and Welcome to
WikiProject Yemen. We are happy that you joined us. If you have any questions, need help on something, or suggestions, then please don't hesitate to tell us. To identify yourself as a member of this project, you can add this template to your user page:
Hi,
I've undid your edits in the Azd page, please discuss your conflicting opinion here so we could come to consensus.
Regards,
DrunkenBedouin
May 2024
Your recent editing history at
Azd shows that you are currently engaged in an
edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about
how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
AdamBlackt •
c 11:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Well thanks for informing me about this, I agree to not knowing the three-revert rule, now I know it, and will follow it, but the reason why I kept reverting (will not do it again), is because during the discussion between me and the other party, that user kept changing it back and hence I changed it back to it’s original form before the discussion commenced.
|MK|📝 11:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Sorry, no, it was highly inconsiderate of you for having flooded the revision history to such an extent. This wasn't an urgent matter (like defacement, defamation, etc.). Both of you reverting back and forth takes the entire screen of the revision history. Please use an applicable
dispute resolution request next time. Thank you.
El_C 12:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Replying to your note and to your response to my unblock request, I didn’t see your note and that’s why I put a unblock request, if I had seen it I would’ve responded and not bothered with the request, and also I didn’t know about the three-revert rule, but when I knew when I was informed about it and knew my mistake, I submitted an unblock request explaining my actions. About the note, I agree with what you said, and again, I did not know about the three-revert rule while reverting, now I know and will stick to three reverts a day, that is if I ever needed those three reverts at any given day.
|MK|📝 12:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Say I unblocked you, what would your intent for that article be for the immediate moment?
El_C 12:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Nothing, I would just continue discussing in the talk page.
|MK|📝 12:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Well you can do that now. Neither one of you is blocked from the talk page, that will always be expressly noted.
El_C 12:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's
guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
El_C 11:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
Well I did violate the three-revert rule, but it wasent to disrupt anything, me and another user, DrunkenBedouin, were involved in a discussion about my changes, where during the discussion in
Talk: Azd DrunkenBedouin kept reverting the changes that we were discussing before reaching an understanding or a consensus, which, if i’m not wrong, is not allowed
|MK|📝 12:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Decline reason:
Looks to me like the block from that one article is helpful to Wikipedia.
--jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:27, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the
guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I guess you're not gonna bother replying to my
note to you above...? Oh well. Also, how do you claim to not know the rules, but at the same time also claim to know the rules? Does not align.
El_C 12:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
WP:DRN regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "
Naseem Hamed".The discussion is about the topic
Naseem Hamed.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Do you mean to apply the comments by CMD? I’d be glad to help!
|MK|📝 03:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Yeah and we can also expand and add other sections to the article Abo Yemen✉ 10:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Ill try to fix the history section as it is clearly missing lots of important events Abo Yemen✉ 10:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
True it needs more sections, other than the Geography section, I think we should add an Infrastructure section, that is if we are able to find proper sources for it. I tried to look for demographic sources for South Yemen before the unity and couldn’t find any proper one, most of which were after the unity. Perhaps there are Arabic sources about demographics?
|MK|📝 11:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
for the demographics ima go search for documents from the cia or something that could provide any info. For the article sections, I think we should see GA level articles, like
Jordan, and try to mimic the article structure Abo Yemen✉ 12:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes but it has to be prior to 1990, else we can't add that to the article, and yes mimicking the structure of GA articles is a good idea, I'll look into it.
|MK|📝 13:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I have an idea, how about we make a draft page for the new sections (for expanding) so that we can improve upon it separately, then we add that to the article.
|MK|📝 20:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
alright. but i think doing it in a sandbox would be better Abo Yemen✉ 21:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Sounds good either way.
|MK|📝 21:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Is your sandbox empty? cus
mine isn't Abo Yemen✉ 12:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Yeah I haven’t used mine, we can use it.
|MK|📝 13:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply