![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SICover_StevePrefontaine.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ( talk) 21:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dkeaton03.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Tony Sidaway and I are pretty much just arguing for sport at this point. No compromise is necessary. If you want to load up the picture of Saxon tapping on the desk as a seperate image. I will support you. Make sure to title it apropriatly and give it a good rational.--
Dr who1975
14:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
BTW... is your name a reference to
The Kentucky Fried Movie?--
Dr who1975
14:30, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree to have it deleted though I can't do it myself. Samantha of Cardyke 15:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Bishopper (Fairy chess piece), by
Voorlandt, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Bishopper (Fairy chess piece) is a redirect to a non-existent page (
CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Bishopper (Fairy chess piece), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Bishopper (Fairy chess piece) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
14:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Will you also then delete the entry for the American Society of Safety Engineers? I think that's what I used for the template.
How do I find what I wrote for the Bay Area Environmental Safety Group? It's gone. Is there some way I can appeal now that it's gone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulburnett ( talk • contribs)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Thrones of Chaos, by
Mschel, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Thrones of Chaos is a redirect to a non-existent page (
CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Thrones of Chaos, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Thrones of Chaos itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
00:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
In the Revenge of the Sith, you reverted my edit where I took off the "and final", since I haven't heard anywhere it's definately the last Star Wars movie to be made, but you reverted it per WP:CRYSTAL. That to me seems a prime example of why "and final" SHOULD be taken out, since it's not reasonable to assume it is the final. After all, it's a very lucrative movie series. On the other hand, it's equally not reasonable to speculate about more movies, because there hasn't been any serious talk of another movie. Hence, the best way to go, I think, would leave speculation of whether or not there's going to be more movies out. After all, it'd be seen silly later on if after Superman IV or Star Trek VI to say there would be no more movies in their universe after those movies. I'm mainly writing because I don't want to start an edit battle. Kevin 17:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Riggle.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.8.104.11 23:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Your recent creation of a dab page at Cancellation is a problem for the philatelic links that now all point to the dab page as do most (maybe even all) of the wikilinks from Cancel. The vast majority of these links are from philatelic topics and now someone needs to correct them all when they were correct to begin with. Most of the non-philatelic wikilinks to these two words are few in number compared to the philatelic links. I think you should have left Cancellation (disambiguation) as it was and add whatever other wikilinks are necessary. An other suggestion would be to add an "otheruse tag" to both the Cancellation and Cancel articles as has been done elsewhere. This change has just created more work rather than less, unless you have some sort of bot to do the job fast and efficiently AND be sure the changes are correct. As an editor deeply involved with the Philately Project and the Philately Portal I hope you will reconsider this action because this was an unwise move in my opinion. I really don't see the point of this change unless it was just change for change sake. Cheers ww2censor 17:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I’ve made a proposal here, about fan-cr*p on Doctor Who articles in the wake of a broadcast. Any opinions?-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
I've replied to your comments. Thanks!-- Rambutan ( talk) 17:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
I messed up on the title for the Phyllis Crawford article, and had no idea how to fix it once the concrete had hardened. I think I understand the way to edit it. Thanks. Mandsford 23:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I am a very young newbie and you bothered to visit my very first page ( Baseball Card Adventures). I don't know what you did but thank you anyway. - E2MB the museblogger 22:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Please stop adding links to the Brackenfur article. It has been redirect to the proper page, and links are unnecessary when that page is already linked to (Or will be shortly, it's still an ongoing project replacing all of the links...). ElectricTurahk 20:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
I just noticed you renamed an article I created, Thanks :) -- Brynet 05:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Guy Goma.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sancho 21:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
I just reverted one of your edits on Last of the Time Lords, thinking you were using a fasle edit summary. But seeing your other edits, I think you were just trying to revert the same edits as I did. So pay no attention to my edit summary :) -- Edokter ( Talk) 19:21, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
A {{
prod}} template has been added to the article
Transportable Ferris-wheels in Germany, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached.
Dhartung |
Talk
06:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:Akaufman1.jpg as {{ no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 10:28, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
The article clearly meets WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE, as it is an "indiscriminate collection of information" (results, in this case) selected from already existing articles. The article was already proposed for deletion. -- Angelo 14:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately Angie may be correct in her tagging. The tag does state "If you are familiar with the subject matter, please improve this article by adding citations to reliable secondary sources to establish its notability or by merging it into a parent article.", the articles she tagged unfortunately don't cite the secondary sources to establish notability -- though they're notable for being episodes of their television series. Matthew 15:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Darkcitymrhand.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for redirecting. I realized when I looked back at that page that it was not accurate, and so I left a message for myself to fix it up, but I never got around to it and it is not on my priority list right now! So redirect is probably good! └ Jared┘┌ t┐ 21:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
I agree with you that this image is not replaceable fair use, as the article is primarily about the interview depicted in the screenshot. However, the fair use rationale is insufficient. Please see this page for fair use rationale requirements and examples, and please revise what is there so it meets the requirements. Thanks for your contribution! -- But| seriously| folks 00:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
I should have mentioned this before, but thank you for your support in my RfA, which was closed as successful. I look forward to serving the community in a new way. Take care! -- But| seriously| folks 08:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to participate in my recent RfA, which did not succeed. I appreciate the helpful comments! Neranei T/ C 16:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:Benito_Martinez.jpg as {{ no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 09:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
A {{
prod}} template has been added to the article
Aaron Andersen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{
db-author}}.
mms
01:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
You may not have noticed the explanation in the comments along with the template that you removed. We use this template every week on the article page instead of an {{ underconstruction}} tag. This week's article is possibly the most high profile page we have tackled at WP:CHICOTW. It is also one of the more developed pages we have addressed. The arguments may be slightly less germane as a result. However, I believe they still hold. The template will be on the page for about 6 more days, unless we can get a WP:DYK out of this topic in which case, they may remove the template for about 6 hours. Let me know if you would like to discuss further.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
You added the box when it was bloated, I've hacked it down to 500 words do you think the tag can come off? Darrenhusted 00:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Joelmchale.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ejfetters 06:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Joelmchale.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:C-3PO's.jpg as {{ no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit 18:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:LasVegas marathon logo200.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:Walton_Goggins.jpg as {{ no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 09:04, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
I noticed your one of the people that wished there to be a list of Japanese games online for Wikipedia which I tried to make for the Nintendo 64 a few months ago, but just like when they where added to the orginal List of Nintendo 64 games they are trying to delete the new page List of Japanese Nintendo 64 games here's a link Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Japanese Nintendo 64 games to the discussion, how about giving your view. ( Floppydog66 16:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC))
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Luckmancover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Curveaway 10:22, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Luckmancover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:David Marciano.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree 16:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mysocalledlifecast.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tubetends ( talk) 03:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Nadine Velazquez.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 20:52, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:Michael_Parks.jpg as {{ replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Garion96 (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:Richard_Bright_(actor).jpg as {{ no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast ( talk) 19:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jay Karnes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 16:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Henry Gale ID.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 17:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:Darwin_awards.jpg as {{ no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang ( talk) 22:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dvdtalklogo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vinh1313 ( talk) 22:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)