![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
|
Thanks for the kind and speedy welcome! I'll do my best. --Diniz 20:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 17:04, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
OK, I'll do that from now on. Diniz 17:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Yes, you're not wrong really - there are one or two anomalies in these tables which we haven't got around to addressing yet. We'll get there in the end! I guess the most important thing at the moment is to make sure all the articles have at least some kind of results table on them. Bretonbanquet 17:24, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Yes, that's a bit of a problem! There are two keys... I started to change the original key and someone else didn't like it, and he suggested two keys. The original one is for the season tables, and the second one ( the new one) is for the driver articles. There are a few differences but they're generally the same. I only bother myself with the driver articles, so I only really use the second key - I suspect that any articles with INJ in capitals are articles I haven't got around to changing yet :o) I'm just trying to standardise things - quite a big job! Bretonbanquet 17:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Ha ha - well you're very welcome - it'll take me months otherwise! Bretonbanquet 17:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
This is going to sound overly defensive, sorry. I just have a problem with this edit summary. [1]. All you did was add a comma and change Williams to Williams F1. While I will admit the comma was a necessary addition, there were no spelling mistakes. Hence your "sp and grammar" edit summary was incorrect. I guess my point is just please be careful - while you weren't criticising my work directly, indirectly you were, wrongly. Mark83 22:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Best of luck if you're going to start reverting changes by 222.225.117.108. I've been tracking them for a couple of weeks now, but as I'm concientious and check his changes against www.formula1.com, it takes a while to reverse them all!
The editor seems to have a strange aversion to the word 'collision'. I've reported it as suspected vandalism, but as most of the changes are fairly harmless I don't know that I have a strong case. user:4u1e
Hey Diniz, great work on the lap chart on 1999 San Marino Grand Prix. Maybe it would just be better to include a reference/source. For all I know you could be making it all up!!!!!! Kind Regards, Manipe 17:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:A1 GP Team Nationalities.PNG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for picking that baton up and running with it, good work! My other half surprised me by reminding me that it wa my turn to cook Sunday lunch, so I had to cut and run. Feel free to remove the speedy deletion tags, I reckon you are entitled now. Thanks! Pyrope 19:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I can verify it I work there, should I take photos? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.65.45.128 ( talk) 21:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
Hi, Diniz. I noticed from your user page that you have made most, perhaps all, of this type of template. I just thought you'd like to know that I have created a 2001 version. I have kept the style identical to your design. Adrian M. H. 22:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Oups,
I'm really sorry, but I just wanted to write fr instead of en to announce the french translation of this article.
82.233.137.133
19:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Spooky - we uploaded the same photo of Taki Inoue's car to Commons within four minutes of each other! Anyway, I've changed the version of the photo on the Taki Inoue article to mine, even though they're identical, because it's self-licensed which I think is preferable. If you haven't got any objections I'll mark the one you uploaded for deletion because there's no point in having the same picture twice. Keep up the good work. Gasheadsteve 20:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm afraid we can't use Image:Michael Schumacher and Bernie Ecclestone.jpg on Wikipedia or the Commons as it is licenced under a CC-BY-ND-2.0 licence. Any Creative Commons licence with No Derivitives (ND) or Non-Commercial (NC) terms is not permitted on Wikipedia. It may only contain BY (Attribution) or SA (Share-Alike). I've tagged the image for deletion although you could try asking the author whether they'd be willing to relicence the image under CC-BY-2.0 instead. Cheers, Alexj2002 09:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey Diniz - Thanks for the messege. Sorry if this reply has come a little too late, that's mainly because of my idea to take a sabbatical forenight off. BTW, I should thank you for the contributions on that list, because it was you who did all the small things I either was too busy to do or just couldn't be arsed, so I thank you for that. Once again, thanks for the help and the messege Diniz ;-). -- S kully Collins Edits 07:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I have started 1985 Formula 3000 season with same stats. It would be very nice, if you can help me. So we can improve these articles together? Thanks Doma-w 13:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Diniz. I noticed that you added the infobox to
Formula 3000. This infobox is not designed for use on articles that describe a formula that has spawned various championships (something like 7 or 8 in this case, I think?) because you cannot complete any of the driver and team fields. It is intended for specific championships, ie GP2, WTCC, etc. In due course, I may create an infobox for this particular use, however, as other pages, such as
Formula Three, might benefit from it.
In case you want to add Template:Infobox motorsport championship to any more articles, we provisionally decided that it is best to list all drivers who entered and attempted to qualify (not necessarily started) a round of the championship in its most recent season. Same for the teams. Include the year to avoid ambiguity. See
GP2 series for an example. Any questions, feel free to let me know. Regards,
Adrian
M. H.
23:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
There appears to be some issues with the racing driver infobox. You've added a "last season" field to the copy/paste section, but not to the code. Anyway, it shouldn't have one at all, as this is solely for current drivers (hence the "2007 {series} driver" caption). I'll revert it back to how it was, unless you have already done so. Regards, Adrian M. H. 22:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)