HI SrMeI - thank you, yes I'd be up for running for adminship, thanks for offering to nominate me! I actually did run for it a few years ago, but missed out as I basically wasn't ready, and was mainly writing... but I'm doing afd now and I'm actually involved in running edit-a-thons in Real Life, and there have been situations where it would have come in handy for that. So yep, thank you!
Deathlibrarian (
talk)
01:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)reply
SrMeI I have decided not to run for adminship for the moment, I just got some advice it would most likely not get through. However, I did get some tips on ways of improving how I do some of my wiki work, which will help me when I do give it a shot. Mainly wanted to say THANK YOU for your kind words. Cheers!
Deathlibrarian (
talk)
13:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of people,
the golden rule and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and
Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Matt Carriker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello! SrMeI,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
David.moreno7201:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of people,
the golden rule and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and
Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The website where he works and IMDB cannot be used.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Matt Carriker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be
used abusively. It has been
blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be
reverted or
deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the
guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators:Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by
administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's
privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an
IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee
may be summarily desysopped.
Ah. Well, behaviorally maybe, but BernardSandoval is Stale so there's no technical data to go on. The CU evidence the block is based upon is unrelated to BernardSandoval. ~
Rob13Talk14:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of people,
the golden rule and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and
Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Matt Carriker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.