From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: François Jackow has been accepted

François Jackow, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Drowssap SMM 20:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Adrien Nussenbaum moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Adrien Nussenbaum. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro ( talk) 14:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Author attribution is required on translations from other Wikipedias

Hello, McSyl, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed your recently created the article Adrien Couret; thank you for your translation. Adding content to Wikipedia by copying or translating from articles on other language Wikipedias is permitted, but per the Terms of use of Wikipedia, such content must be attributed in the edit summary of the edit where you added copied/translated content. If you forgot (or didn't know), you can add in the attribution after the fact per the instructions at Repairing insufficient attribution. The template {{ Attribution repair}} may help formulate the required wording for you; for example:

{{ attribution repair|Adrien Couret|ca|09:01, 21 April 2024}} → [[WP:RIA|Note:]] The previous edit of 09:01, 21 April 2024 [[WP:TFOLWP|translated]] content from the Catalan Wikipedia page at [[:ca:Adrien Couret]]; see its history for attribution.

Please add this attribution to the revision history of Adrien Couret by using a dummy edit as explained at WP:RIA and WP:DUMMY. Thanks, Mathglot ( talk) 01:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Also please add an WP:RIA attribution statement for Louli Sanua translated from the French fr:Louli Sanua. Thanks. Mathglot ( talk) 04:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Hi Mathglot. Thanks for your message. There is no French Wikipedia for the article Adrien Couret. Kind Regards-- McSyl ( talk) 14:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Hi again Mathglot.Done for Louli Sanua. Kind Regards.-- McSyl ( talk) 14:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Yeah, I copied the wrong lang code on the template on the Adrien Couret article, but the correct one is in the example above and I've fixed it at the article, as you translated from the Catalan article, not the French one, right? By the way, do you speak Catalan and French? Because it doesn't make sense to create articles like these using WP:MACHINETRANSLATION if you don't; instead, you can request a translation from a foreign Wikipedia article. For some languages, there may be a WikiProject where listing the request may also attract some interest. Mathglot ( talk) 19:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) reply
I also updated Louli Sanua to add the attribution ( diff). Mathglot ( talk) 22:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Hi Mathglot. If you look carefully, the catalan article has been written 2 hours and 22 minutes after the English one. Have a very nice day. -- McSyl ( talk) 10:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC) reply
Hi. Fair point; no attribution needed on the English one, in that case. Mathglot ( talk) 10:16, 5 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Château de Jouy-en-Josas moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Château de Jouy-en-Josas. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin ( talk) 10:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC) reply

June 2024

Information icon

Hello McSyl. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:McSyl. The template {{ Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=McSyl|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. S0091 ( talk) 18:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. I am very surprised by your message. I am not paid for anything. Have a very nice day. Kind Regards. -- McSyl ( talk) 07:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi McSyl. Thank you for your work on Jules Marcadet. Another editor, CanonNi, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start. Consider expanding the references ( ProveIt can help).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CanonNi}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

'''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talkcontribs) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks a lot. -- McSyl ( talk) 12:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Deletion discussion about Vincent Bastien

Hello McSyl, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Vincent Bastien, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Bastien.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone ( talk) 14:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC) reply