Welcome!
Hello, Maturescence, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Hestercombe House. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
—
Rod
talk
07:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Assume blocked in error - frequent contributor and working through a protected IT system}}
The IP in question appears to be a Web filter operated by MessageLabs, as such it is likely to be shared. I'll go ahead and WP:AGF, but would caution against violating nay policies. Q T C 04:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for adding details to Arthur Stark. If you ever happen to find any additional information on the Woodward brothers, it would likewise be much valued. JMK ( talk) 22:41, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
The article Thomas Knox-Shaw has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
MegaSloth (
talk)
01:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
hamiltonstone (
talk)
06:36, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Kevin Rudd. Users who
edit disruptively or refuse to
collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the
three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the
talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains
consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
Lear's
Fool
11:33, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed two edits in which you have inserted material into an article that is a word-for-word copy of a news source:
Please be aware that attributing content to a source is not enough to avoid copyright violations and plagiarism. The material has to be written in your own words. The relevant policies are at WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:Close paraphrasing. Please let me know if you have any questions. -- Mkativerata ( talk) 22:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I don't suppose you can shed any light on my confusion with the University Of Cambridge lecturer of the same name, could you please? Thanks. -- Trevj ( talk) 21:55, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)