This user may have left Wikipedia. Martynas Patasius has not edited Wikipedia since 16 January 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome!
Hello, Martynas Patasius, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
You might be also interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Lithuania-- Lokyz 19:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Leave that
Knutux alone ,because he might be a fucking
gay from
Wilna adn his father
russian.
Angry wikiman — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.158.244.124 ( talk • contribs) 12:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you might be interested and possibly join WikiProject Lithunia -- Lokyz 18:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your fix to my typo/thinko in Category:Chess openings ( Semi-Open Game -> Semi-Closed Game). Quale 01:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Sure, go right ahead and do that. I try not to do cut and paste moves, which is why I did as I did. I've been trying to fix some of the problems with the redirects, and every now and again I come across another. Thank you. Benkenobi18 ( talk) 21:27, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Do you think it is the same user as the accused anon?-- Lokyz ( talk) 23:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I am looking for a Lithuanian speaker to translate a part of a Lithuanian article into English or Polish; it is relevant to
a RfC discussion on English Wikipedia. See my request on Polish Wikipedia
here. Thanks, --
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
talk
22:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Sure, if you wish. But please do it; I prefer to see tags removed if possible. Andycjp ( talk) 00:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Please review the conversation on Talk:Battle in Berlin#Polish troops and consider if the comments after you posted you opinion have changed you mind. Please post you opinion one way or other to the bottom of the section. I do not think that there is a consensus to keep a banner at the top of the page for months on end over this issue, given the opinions of two other editors who are active editors on military history articles. From his last User:Piotrus does not agree. -- Philip Baird Shearer ( talk) 13:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi. In the past you have contributed to Orienteering. The article is getting a makeover now; if you would like to help, please see Talk:Orienteering. Thanks. -- Una Smith ( talk) 20:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Good evening to you and regards from Campora San Giovanni. I write you regarding the articles of a note police television series: Inspector Rex. For better saying some principal actors of the international series. Martin Weinek and Kaspar Capparoni. Weinek is the veteran of the Austrian series, now real member of the series international, as well as excellent agricultural and theatrical entrepreneur and an experienced wine-grower. Capparoni is the new entry of the series, but he has already worked and he works for international productions and with famous directors, I quote among everybody: Dario Argento. I think that the series will arrive within the winter 2008 thanks also to Rai International, that will be transmitted in 150 countries and in more than 60 languages, among which the Lithuanian. Naturally if you will help me in this, me ricamberò really the favor translating a biography or a geographical article in Italian and Sicilian. In fact on the Italian edition they are biographer and geographer. In attends him of one certain answer of yours I thank you in advance and I greet you from Campora San Giovanni, my village native. Thanks still for the patience and the understanding.-- Lodewijk Vadacchino ( talk) 12:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Labas Martynai, you an active editor and your English skills are ok, could you help translating/improving various articles regarding Lithuania its people etc? Starting from these Category:Articles needing translation from Lithuanian Wikipedia, for instance. iki, M.K. ( talk) 09:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Can you help find sources for Lithuania–Romania relations? -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 23:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello Martynas - you expressed your thoughts about this article at two noticeboards - your input would be welcome at the talk page. Sincerely, Novickas ( talk) 16:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I can see you contributed to "Contracts" article. If you have some spare time would you like to contribute to http://www.wikilawschool.org It is a non-profit law school study guide resource for law school students. Looking forward to your help! Thanks for kind consideration. 119.202.38.234 ( talk) 08:07, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for moving it! I am still trying to get the hang of Wikipedia and all. Have a good day Noeljack ( talk) 18:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
I noticed a question mark after you tagged Ebenezer gyasi for speedy deletion. You were correct, it was indeed an attack page. In the future please be sure to leave a notification of speedy deletion nomination on the user's talk page after tagging the page. This acts as a warning for the user's talk page. Thank you and keep up the great work. Valley2 city‽ 21:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
I really admire your attempts to introduce principles and rules to various nationalistic agenda driven one day accounts or anonymous IPs. But form my experience I can tell, that it isn't worth efforts and time, as after few days they usually disappear. Better to concentrate free time for the writing new articles. Cheers, M.K. ( talk) 20:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
just to be brief, I do apologize. I saw last night that according to WP policy (even if I may not personally totally agree, in that it could be an uptight view by WP, but it still needs to be followed) "some maintain" is considered "weasel"ish... IF NO REFERENCES are given. Which there weren't. So technically what you (and Diannaa) said is true. Sorry about the trouble. The only reason I'm writing you here is because you wrote me on my talk page.... But anyway, it's fine. I was merely making the point that there is another WP policy of NEUTRALITY in wording, and not to have the tone of endorsing a particular view THAT NOT ALL SCHOLARS OR HISTORIANS agree with. Not everyone agrees that the trinity doctrine was formulated even at Nicaea, let alone before Nicaea. Some think that, but not all. Anyway, thanks for your attention to this. It's no sweat. And again..... my apologies. 68.237.216.187 ( talk) 03:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
I added them due they are direct desendents of Mindaugas II of Lithuania making them pretenders like other desendents of forer royal families. According to the pretender article the person is a pretender regardles if they dont advance it or acknowledge or not. I fixed it alittle so that it says they are pretenders to the 1918 Kingdom of Lithuania and not the medevil on I had before. Spongie555 ( talk) 03:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello! On 10th June 2011, about an article "Health-EU Portal", you were mentionning possibility of copyright violations. And then the article got a lot of cuts. I don't know who cut it so much. But if it is you, just to let you know that in betwwen I got the permission for the content. The permission is on file in OTRS ticket # 2011062210004646. Accordingly I restored the text as it was. I am quite new on wikipedia, so if I did something wrong let me know! All the best, Parizellina — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parizellina ( talk • contribs) 09:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Since you've dealt with Willfults in the past, I'd really appreciate your help over at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Willfults. Ian.thomson ( talk) 22:52, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In Rational animal, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Substance, Rational and Corporeal ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Reichsrat (Germany), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waldeck ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Martynas. Your questions on this topic are stimulating and appreciated. When thinking about guidelines for Fringe Theory, I have a sense of what it is: pseudoscience, astrology, clairvoyance, ufology, popular myths (e.g. Big Foot), levitation, conspiracy theories... spring to mind.
But can you confirm that it also includes climate-change skeptics, complementary medicine like crystal healing, homeopathy, yoga, meditation, pseudo-history, psychotherapy and creationism? I believe it does and it would help me to be able to consider all the fields as they are quite different and lead to many different career paths. Is there a list of fringe theories on WP? Kooky2 ( talk) 00:06, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
I was reading an old conversation you participated in, and I thought I'd mention how much progress has gone on over at Today's articles for improvement. If you missed it, an RFC was held and concensus was established that the TAFI content should be placed below the DYK content. We will be launching the feature on the Main Page shortly, and the Main Page sandbox shows it will look. Participation on the talk page is always welcome. -- Nick Penguin( contribs) 04:38, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Say, thanks for your suggestion in the Survey of the Nicaea talk page! That's a great help to me! Evenssteven ( talk) 08:39, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Attorney-General of the Duchy of Lancaster, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William Russell and Samuel Hall ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Council of Ephesus (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 09:17, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
You are right to question the source. If this is a subject you are interested in then check out this link (p.Lxix) [14]. Coffin text 269 also equates the barley with the Osiris. [15]. Yt95 ( talk) 13:30, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
You are being notified because you have participated in previous discussions on the same topic. Alsee ( talk) 19:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
You participated in the Overturn of the first closing of the Media Viewer RfC. You are invited to comment on the Close Review Request of the second closing of the same RfC: wp:Administrators'_noticeboard#Close_Review_Request_after_overturn_and_reclose. Alsee ( talk) 14:14, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guarantee (international law), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Neutrality and State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Military alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Triple Alliance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Martynas Patasius. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Organisation's goals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
summary of a single source; already covered in multiple WP articles
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DGG (
talk )
19:26, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Organisation's goals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organisation's goals until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich ( talk) 03:14, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berlin Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page August Busch ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Martynas Patasius. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Wikimedia Foundation has invited the various Wikimedia communities, including the English Wikipedia, to participate in a consultation on improving communication methods within the Wikimedia projects. As such, a request for comment has been created at Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019. You are invited to express your views in the discussion. ~ Winged Blades Godric 05:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Commission of National Education, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stanisław Poniatowski, Bishop of Kiev and Michał Radziwiłł ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of members of council of Vilnius University is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of members of council of Vilnius University until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 10:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organisation's goals (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
DGG ( talk ) 02:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organisational ideology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.