Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.
We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 08:43, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
Don't forget you also play the spoons. Starálfur 19:47, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
Dobre daan Malfidus. Kako si? Kako vam je ime?
Hello Malfidus, thanks for the spoken article Britisches Englisch. It's very helpful to hear the examples from a native speaker. I just want to remark that BBC is articulated like an english word and not like the german letters. -- ElRakı ?! 15:21, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Hi Malfidus. I really enjoyed listening to your article. It makes a lot of sense to read that one by a native speaker. Thanks a lot :-) I wish I could vote for it on de:Wikipedia:Kandidaten für exzellente Aufnahmen, but I am not entitled to vote yet. One small remark: the sentence "Diese Aussprache hätten auch viele Sprecher angenommen, die nicht aus dem Süden Englands kommen und an diesen Schulen unterrichtet wurden." is duplicated in the recording. Cheers -- Zeitlupe 00:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for voting in my RfA; I promise I'll wield my sacred mop with care. If you ever need me for anything, you know where to find me. Thanks again! -- Essjay · Talk 15:30, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I wasn´t aware of the fact that some people already praised your work for the German Wikiproject "Gesprochene Wikipedia", when I wrote the lines you can find under the provided link. Anyway, they certainly weren´t wrong.
I do hope that your work will be moved to "Excellent recordings", because I think it belongs there. Thanks for the nice and easy way how you´ve read this article. I - for my part - did enjoy these few minutes of listening. gumboyaya —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.176.24.90 ( talk • contribs) 22:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC).
oh..got it..thx for the explaination (explaination?..is right itsn't?)..anyway merry christmas
Äpple
10:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Maybe you are interested in this project... -- Michkalas 16:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
After noticing your recent Iceland-related contributions, I would like to ask you to vote for the Icelandic language article in the Article Creation and Improvement Drive, your vote would be greatly appreciated if Icelandic language is nominated for ACID so that we can collaboratively improve the article. I would also like to take this opportunity to invitie you to become a member of WikiProject Iceland, as Michkalas has done above. Thank you! Max Naylor Max Naylor 15:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Ég er nú ekki sammála þér um það hvort það sé "Góðan daginn" eða "Góða daginn". Flest fólk segir "Góðan daginn" en ég las á vísindavefnum að það væri vitlaust. Þú ættir að sjá afhverju:
Góður | Dagur | Góður dagur | Góði dagurinn |
Góðan1 | Dag | Góðan dag | Góða daginn2 |
Góðum | Degi | Góðum degi | Góða deginum |
Góðs | Dags | Góðs dags | Góða dagsins |
1 - "n" þegar lýsingarorðið er eitt og sér.
2 - Það stigbreytist ekki með "n" þegar "dagur" er með greini.
Þetta hljómar samt alls ekki rangt vegna þess að fólk notar þetta alltaf en ef þú prófar að segja "Góðan deginum" þá fattar þú hversu rangt þetta hljómar fyrir mér. -- S.Örvarr.S 01:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
lol... I thought you were Icelandic but when I viewed an old version of your userpage I found out the truth.. let me put this into English for you -- S.Örvarr.S 01:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
I beg to differ on whether it's "Góðan daginn" or "Góða daginn". If you look at the table below you should see why:
nominative | Góður | Dagur | Góður dagur | Góði dagurinn |
accusative | Góðan | Dag | Góðan dag | Góða daginn |
dative | Góðum | Degi | Góðum degi | Góða deginum |
genitive | Góðs | Dags | Góðs dags | Góða dagsins |
Although folk constantly use "Góðan daginn" it is wrong when using another noun with an article. You probably don't see why but it just sounds wrong. Like saying "a men", that's wrong to a native speaker but it might not sounds so to a foreigner. -- S.Örvarr.S 01:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Be so kind to look at my proposal on the talkpage for this article. -- S.Örvarr.S 09:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I support your edits (reverts) of the Cambridge article. As it is not blatant vandalism, the Three Revert Rule still applies. If they edit it again, and you revert again, that will be your 3 edits. Drop me a message if you want me to do some reverts for you :). Tiddly Tom 17:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)