Dear Magnolia677, I'm hoping you actually read these. There seems to be a lot of them. About the City of Spokane Valley history, did you read my edits before you deleted them? You deleted the parts that were actually about the City of Spokane Valley that had references attached because they were "Out of Scope", but re-added the sections that were *not* about the City of Spokane Valley. The current article is no longer referenced or accurate, as discussed on the talk page. Is this section of history of the City of Spokane Valley suppose to be about the region and not the individual city? Please explain the "Out-of-scope". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katrazyna ( talk • contribs) 23:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Dear Magnolia677, this talk is in reply to your message : "Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jenő Hubay, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop reverting my edits to add unsourced, non-notable content. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:07, 31 July 2020 (UTC)" Who are you to revert my edits to Hubay page? a Musicologist? If yes, It's your problem if you do not know the Hubay's pupils that I mentioned... This is history, music history... and if you need confirmations please ask to the Hubay Society in Budapest, or, better buy my CDs, whose booklets are fully explanatory!!! (www.rhineclassics.com) So, please, restore by your own my adding to the Hubay page. In contrary case, I will be forced to revert again by myself. Many thanks, respectfully yours, EP (Italy)
Please stop policing content from other peoples' popular cultures that you clearly know nothing about. You do not need to cite a discography which is widely available information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.255.108.232 ( talk) 16:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Common knowledge, such as a list of musical releases you can easily find anywhere does not need to be sourced. Please stop randomly reverting edits and I would highly suggest that you stay in your lane.
Hi! About the verbage involving the lynching of Howard Wash at Laurel, Mississippi, the previous editor was somewhat correct. Wash had been convicted that day, the jury was to decide on a sentence the next morning. It is exceedingly unlikely the trial was a fair one. There are a couple of sources at the bottom of my talk page, if you are interested. I don't intend to edit it further myself, but thought you might want to after seeing the sources, if you feel like it. Jacona ( talk) 16:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
You reverted my edit on the aforementioned article and left a message on my talk page. However, AFAIK, "in popular culture" sections don't require citations because they list the work that includes the subject, and the precedent is easily reviewed. MrThunderbolt1000T ( talk) 04:27, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
You reverted my edit at the aforementioned article, with the reasoning that the references to Vicksburg in In the Heat of the Night are unnotable and unsourced.
First off, In the Heat of the Night was nominated for several Golden Globes and NAACP Image awards, and Carroll O'Connor won a Primetime Emmy for his portrayal of Chief Bill Gillespie. It's well-established that the television series was both popular and well-received by both general audiences and critics. Your reasoning there is irrational. You should have done some research before making that assumption.
Secondly, it's popular precedent that "in popular culture" information doesn't necessarily need sources or citations, because media such as music, movies, pictures, paintings, etc., are self-verifying works. An example is that I don't need to provide a citation when I add "Lake Pontchartrain is mentioned in the song Hurricane by Band of Heathens" to the Lake Pontchartrain article, because all I have to do to verify the added information is to listen to the aforementioned song. I don't need to go through the trouble of finding a reliable source because it's verifiable through simpler means. It presents itself clearly and can be verified through lesser means. This is an established precedent that you can see in many articles on Wikipedia. That isn't necessarily a violation of Wikipedia's rules on sources.
Also, I noticed that you reverted a part in that same section of the Vicksburg article about the song "Mississippi Queen," with the aforementioned reason being that Vicksburg was only mentioned once in the song. I'm going to say it simply: it doesn't matter whether it was mentioned once or mentioned 42 times, it's still a mention of Vicksburg by a notable band in a notable song. That reasoning is irrational.
Have a good one, MrThunderbolt1000T ( talk) 10:00, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
I believe there has been some sort of mistake. When I added that noteworthy point about Fort Yukon being along the Arctic Circle I cited the exact source [1] Wikipedia uses in defining the ever-changing latitude of the Arctic Circle. The source is even used by the Wiki template Template:Circle of latitude. I just followed the exact line of latitude that was defined on 13 May 2014 as 66°33′50.0″ and stumbled across the fact it passes through the southern portion of Fort Yukon. Cheers, Ponderosapine210 ( talk) 17:45, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
References
You reverted my edits on the Daily Mean portion of the Browning climate model, claiming it was unsourced. I have observed that the daily mean is just the average of the highs and lows. Therefore, no sourcing is required.
-- Rubberducky785 ( talk) 01:43, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
I observed that the numbers differed throughout Wikipedia. Most sites referred to the height of the mountain as a different number, and therefore I changed it to that. I admit, I should have found a source for that. In addition, I understand that synthesized conclusions are banned. However it is extremely obvious that the Daily Mean is an exception. This is a numerical source, not a verbal source. We all know what the daily mean is. While it is not explicitly stated, both the highs and lows are given to you by the same source, which is not synthesis. I am not making original observations off data, I am using completely intuitive and understandable methods to add data. Rubberducky785 ( talk) 19:40, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Yes, but the given highs and lows in the chart are already mean monthly highs and lows. In addition the science publication instructs us to find the average of all the mean monthly temperatures to get the mean yearly temperature, which is exactly what I did. Search up any major city's climate section and you will see that Daily Means are simply the averages of the highs and lows. In order to prevent further conflict I will no longer edit these charts. However I highly recommend you share this information with others as the actions I took in editing the chart were identical to everyone else's. Rubberducky785 ( talk) 01:00, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you reverted an edit I made earlier today, adding David Rockola to the notable people section of the Virden Manitoba page. Just wondering why he doesn’t cut it? Rock-ola itself has its own Wikipedia page, and those jukeboxes are quite well known. Plasticflasks ( talk) 03:06, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
How in the world is a Wikipedia Category unsourced content, I can't put an intext citation for it because Wikipedia doesn't allow you to do it next to a "[[Category: ____]". The reasoning is evident within the text and the text has sources, all I did was insert categories with similar articles. WhatsUpAfrica ( talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Regarding your edit summary on Toronto, I think the same thing would apply to the top montage image of Calgary. For some reason, the editor Acefitt prefers this horribly hued and colorized photo over previous ones that looked much more realistic. If you can, please try to reason with the editor. Thanks, ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 18:59, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
For some reason, your name is being bandied about by Carmaker1, a user with more than enough experience and who claims to hold advance degrees and important positions in commerce but apparantly cannot follow the rules and instructions at ANI, where he's been numerous times. Since he's too lazy/deceitful/arrogant/whatever to notify you as required: it's at WP:ANI#Carmaker1. Fyi. John from Idegon ( talk) 07:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
I did not know that, as they are not being accused of anything are they? My name has been mentioned in past AN/Is I have NOT been a part of, with no knowledge or pinging. Only discovering while doing a Google search or reviewing archives. I suggest you mind your own conduct, as it's not your place to make such commentary and make hypocritical character attacks outside of simple notification, if required. Carmaker1 ( talk) 07:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Magnolia677. I have indicated on my user page that I am a paid graduate assistant of the University of Maryland. I also have a conflict of interest heading. Should I put this information in a different location? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bellstran ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
I agree with you, the ACLU source article got less neutral the more I read it. Thanks for removing it and replacing it with the CNN-sourced article that explained their authorization better. LetterOpener ( talk) 02:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I mentioned you about an issue you had been involved in. Since you haven't commented, I am making a note here in case you didn't get a ping. If you just don't want to comment, then just disregard this. Thanks. The thread is here. MB 04:14, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Really, a consensus has been reached using poor grammar and awkward wording? 50.25.221.206 ( talk) 23:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you reverted my edit, thinking it to be vandalism. However, it is not vandalism, as this unincorporated community has an animal mayor. Wikitrumpets ( talk) 23:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Yeah, when I finished editing I went back and tried to add in references but I got your message shortly after. Mind if I add in the public transportation page with references this time? Thanks! Android7400 ( talk) 20:08 22 June 2020 (UTC)
The photograph that I had added to the Cherokee Dam article had been of coursed edited, but I can assure you that the "blue haze" that you are seeing is not from my editing. As you can see in the photograph, there are rays of sunlight beaming through over the top of the structure. This picture was taken around 7-8 AM EST. Plus, your input of the picture being "hideous" is an opinion, so how is your opinion a valid reason to remove the photo, given it is of better quality in pixilation compared to previously submitted files?
I don't know how to reply to the messages on here so I hope you get this and you can delete it once you have read it. I have Aspergers / High Functioning Autism and your message upset me. I spent heaps of time on those changes because the Studio 10 page needs desperate updating. Many people listed haven't been on the show for years. No written sources will show things that you can see with your eyes. My changes were obvious changes that have occurred on the show since it changed Executive Producers. They have added a News segment and it is good and important to list Current fill-in presenters (like the news), which the list shown on the Studio 10 page is not. It is an old list, it has changed so much. Things like Fill-in presenters can fill-in for any presenter like Bishop, Drysdale, Kennerley or Hildebrand. Merrick Watts fills in for any of them. Natarsha Belling is the main fill-in for Sarah Harris and various people fill-in for the news. Narelda Jacobs is mainly a reporter, but is also a Panelist/Co-host. This can be backed up by a source ( https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/morning-shows/studio-10-announce-new-panellist-for-2020/news-story/ab16e9616b40ca359437658c18acd288) But you just have to watch the show to see that the fill-in presenters have changed and there are also News Fill-in presenters. The list on the page is old and needs to be current. You can email me at mark.ch@adam.com.au - Mark Cheesman — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.165.8 ( talk) 16:27, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
But as I said there is no reliable source to back-up the fill-in presenters. The source is every single viewer who watches the show. They all would know that most of the fill-in presenters listed on the Wikipedia page haven't been on the show for years. They all would know who fills in. Why can't people who actually watch the show update the page to show actual current fill-in presenters. It keeps the page current. Not all changes to shows will have a source to back it up. But people who watch the show will know the changes exist. You can't keep a page current just from reliable sources, some sources come from the show itself and people who watch it. Otherwise the wikipedia page won't be current and isn't it important the page is current. The list on the page of fill-in presenters isn't current, they are so old. I spent so long updating it and making sure it is correct. I don't want to have to go through that all over again, I have already done it. The list now is not current. The list I put up was current and showed news fill-ins and actual current fill-in presenters; that don't have a physical source to back it up, as the source is the show. How come the list of presenters on the Studio 10 Wikipedia page doesn't show a citation. There is no reliable source linked to the current list of fill-in presenters. So why can't the list be updated by someone who watches the show? The list has just grown over the years by people adding presenters. But the list changed when the Executive Producer changed. How can the list be current if people who watch the show can't update to show information that can only be received by actually watching the show. - Mark Cheesman
Well, that's just stupid. Without a chain and pedals, the bike can't go anywhere. Just like without Fill-in presenters, the show wouldn't be the same. For a bike to go it needs parts, which means it needs fill-in presenters when regular presenters are sick or unavailable. Without every part of the bike it won't go anywhere, without every part of Studio 10 it won't be a full show. If a bike didn't receive replacement parts, it won't work, if the Studio 10 Wikipedia page didn't receive updated fill-in presenters then it wouldn't be current, just like a bike with no new parts. Does a bike need to show proof of reliable sources to make it current. Just like looking at a bike to know it is wrong, a viewer looking at Studio 10 and the Wikipedia page will know that the page isn't current. A bike can show what is needed by looking at it, just like the Studio 10 page can show what is needed by looking at it to make it current. How can a Television Show Wikipedia page be current, if no one who actually watches the show can update it without reliable sources? Just like a bike who is owned by someone who can't ride a bike and who knows nothing about bikes. It would just sit there get old and rot when it is not being looked after by someone who knows about bikes and can ride one. Without someone who watches Studio 10 updating it, how can the page be up to date, new, fresh and correct. Many things about a TV show like its fill-in presenters won't be documented and would only be known by watching the show, therefore can not be backed up by reliable sources Mcheesie79 ( talk) 09:23, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
In the weather context for places in Canada, humidex and wind chill are not temperatures, so the {{ Convert}} template should not be used.
Eye snore 22:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Magnolia677, Muncie's neighborhood boundaries are mapped at the Delaware County level by its GIS Department. The Delaware County GIS Department's map of the Muncie's neighborhoods is at https://delcogis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f9e36453d4f446b5bc090ffd4ae7c8d3. Is that official map an acceptable source (and I could mention about how this data is mapped by the county GIS Dept)? The GIS Department clarified to me that the GIS department's map is more up-to-date than Google Maps b/c Google Maps sometimes has delays in processing the county's updated map data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommyviper ( talk • contribs) 19:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Reference added. Feel free to update. Comm260 ncu ( talk) 21:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello and thanks for bringing that to my attention, I don't like unsourced material anymore than I am sure you do. I just saw after I made that edit to Pittsburgh's sister cities that Charleroi and Pittsburgh were not sister cities as of 2019 (coincidence? Still very weird).
Meanwhile, Charleroi still lists Pittsburgh as a sister city, though that page's International relations section lacks citation.
The weird thing is, I couldn't find a link stating why these cities seem not to be connected anymore. In any case, what do you think?
Thanks, 71.82.237.58 ( talk) 02:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Wiscipidier
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 14:27, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
The removal of my content from the Morristown, Tennessee article does not make any sense. I compared the overall construction of the larger and higher-quality Knoxville, Tennessee article which had some similarity to the edits I added to the Morristown page (I.E. highway description, external links to official city related websites, general city location with description).
I believe that your edits are not contributing to improvement of the article and find it insulting that my edits are considered "unconstructive."
Thanks, -- AppalachianCentrist
Please tell me how a book entirely about Henderson is not specific to Henderson Dshep913 ( talk) 22:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
I have been following the US Cities guidelines. Here is quotes to explain my reasoning behind my edits.
For economy:
“=== Manufacturing / Industry === Especially for cities, such as Detroit or Cleveland, where manufacturing has been responsible for a significant number of jobs.”
For media:
“If any major motion pictures, television shows, or syndicated radio broadcasts were filmed/recorded or originated in the city, this would probably be a good place to put that information.”
For external link to visitor site:
“A link to some of the official websites should be provided here, such as the official city government, or the convention and visitors bureau.”
Care to explain the reason why the photo was violation? You never gave a reason in the edit summary. It followed the photo policy per MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE.
Thanks, -- AppalachianCentrist
Thanks, -- AppalachianCentrist
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Thank you. I am still a new editor and so I appreciate your editing my edits at Venice, Los Angeles. Peace. Robert Jan van de Hoek ( talk) 16:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC) |
You are very welcome! Peace, 'Roy' Robert Jan van de Hoek ( talk) 20:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Magnolia677,
It's very unfortunate that the edits I made were deleted. All of the information is within the CBP intranet and internal memorandums and are not available to be openly referenced.
I know the information to be accurate because I am program manager for awards and history. I wrote the articles - https://www.cbp.gov/border-security/along-us-borders/history/father-us-border-patrol https://www.cbp.gov/border-security/along-us-borders/history/early-rank-and-time-service-insignia
I also contracted with the Army Institute of Heraldry to repurpose the old designs. https://tioh.army.mil/Catalog/Heraldry.aspx?HeraldryId=18804&CategoryId=10768&grp=9&menu=Federal%20Government&ps=0&p=0 https://tioh.army.mil/Catalog/Heraldry.aspx?HeraldryId=18803&CategoryId=10768&grp=9&menu=Federal%20Government&from=search
My hope is that you allow the changes I made to stand as the information is accurate. However, the source information is not public and can't be referenced. To not allow my edits to stand will perpetuate inaccurate information.
Thank you Bayoclam ( talk) 02:03, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Additionally, I was able to get an updated pdf to be published by CBP for the Chiefs of the Border Patrol. I hope that can establish my legitimacy with you. Furthermore, I hope to have a similar source to reference published by CBP for the awards section that you removed. Once that goes live, would you be able to reinstate my awards edits? I'm am not well versed in editing pages and to do so is quite a lift. Thank you. Bayoclam ( talk) 18:20, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CaradhrasAiguo ( leave language) 01:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, Hope you're well, I am new and keen to learn editor to Wikipedia and would appreciate some guidance in what i did wrong with the edit you reverted that i made on Instagram. Many thanks for your time. - Ukdatageek ( talk) 08:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Ok i understand, so i need to be more factual with edit. This is a major new feature from Instagram so was trying to explain what it does in detail. Also noted on the external links to the body of the text. I would like to get it right, do you mind me having another go? Ukdatageek ( talk) 10:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Magnolia677 thankyou, i will have another go. I really do appreciate the help there. Thanks so much! Ukdatageek ( talk) 10:20, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for your input on Lamar, I think we have more work to do....As far as the reference in Lamar County, Mississippi to Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar, the man was a lot of things. As is so typical, in this article he has been described for only the warm/fuzzy (at least to some people) sort of those things. In addition to the achievements the lost-cause apologists love to expound on, he was also a slave owner, a traitor to the U.S. (he wrote the Mississippi secession ordinance, was commissioned as a colonel in the CSA army, until he washed out because of "vertigo", then as a diplomat). He was a huge opponent of African-American voting rights, and helped develop the Klan. He was also quite accomplished in the political arena, serving in both houses of congress, the first Confederate to return to congress after reconstruction, and became a supreme court justice. So, while it's complicated, a description that just identifies him as a wonderful guy (the original was "post- Civil War Mississippi statesman") can't be considered a neutral pov. It may sound shocking to some to add white supremacist, but it certainly fits. How can we word a short description that captures who he is from a NPOV without whitewashing? I'm wide open to suggestions. Thanks. Jacona ( talk) 16:40, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Magnolia677, you might want to revisit this edit. Regards. Woodlot ( talk) 18:52, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
You have reverted multiple edits I made to various Chicago community areas given data from the most recent American Community Survey from the US Census Department. Your comment claims it is not from the US Census. This is not accurate. Community areas are official boundaries defined by the City of Chicago, and the boundaries are a collection of Census Tracts defined by the City of Chicago ( https://data.cityofchicago.org/Facilities-Geographic-Boundaries/Boundaries-Census-Tracts-2010/5jrd-6zik)
The sources cited on every community area edit (which were the previous sources, but now updated in July 2020) are from CMAP - the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning. Every year, CMAP publishes a report using mainly US Census American Community Survey data (5 year). The latest ACS available is from 2018 and CMAP's latest publishes using US Census data was published in June 2020. There are other data in this report, but the population, educational, and income data come from the US Census. Following any of the sources listed, you will be able to see these explanations of the data
An example: https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/documents/10180/126764/Lake+View.pdf
"About The Community Data Snapshot The Community DataSnapshots area series of county, municipal,and Chicago Community Area data profiles that primarily feature data from the 2014-2018 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. As noted in each profile, the data comes from multiplesources in addition to the ACS, which include U.S. Census Bureau, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Illinois Department of EmploymentSecurity (IDES), Illinois Department of Revenue(IDR),and the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP).
Chicago Community Area (CCA) values CCA values areestimated by aggregating 2014-2018 ACS census tract and blockgroup level data
The data is in fact from the US Census. Please read into the source before blindly reverting entire edits. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jhendrix86 (
talk •
contribs)
22:26, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Please be aware that all the revisions you did merely reverted 2018 data back to 2015 data, which is the same study and same exact source (US Census 5 year ACS put together by CMAP) but from a previous year (2015). The community areas of Chicago are a collection of census tracts, making up 1 or more unofficial neighborhood, and are a City of Chicago government only concept. They are the only officially city government recognized entity outside of what the US Census defines (tracts, blocks, block groups, zip codes, etc). As stated previously, CMAP is the official source of these population, economic, demographic, etc data by community area using mainly the US Census by census tract - used by universities. CMAP is a Government of Illinois adjacent entity, hence their website is hosted on illinois.gov. Every year, the 5-year US Census ACS represents an opportunity for the entire country to look at the survey and for cities such as Chicago to look at the state of each community area, as well as its trends from the previous years. The data comes from the US Census Department and it is a City of Chicago government-only recognized concept which many research institutions, journalists, criminologists, etc utilize in their research.
Every summer (June or July), CMAP publishes new data based on the latest available 5-year Census ACS. They do not change their URLs from the previous year publish (for some reason) which is why in some pages previous editors have left archived URLs with those as well so people can see previous publishes as well. As I had to enter these numbers into the articles, I had to retrieve the URLs for each article which came from which were present in each article. As you will see if you objectively look at the history of edits, the CMAP source has been used on each of these articles for years. I personally verified every link and they were not broken. If they were broken for you, then there is another reason as those PDFs are live:
https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/data/community-snapshots
"The US Census should be the primary source of demographic data. If census estimates or other reliable sources of demographic data are included, the additional data should supplement – not replace – the most recent available data from the decennial census."
The articles being edited are not for cities but for neighborhoods within cities that are not defined by the US Census but are defined by city governments officially. Please link to the guidlines around neighborhood entities of cities and how to deal with demographic information. I also recommend reading more into the definition of community areas.
https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/dgs/supp_info/citywide_maps.html
Thank you.
The list of bodies of water was an artifact from somebody else's earlier edit. I'll be removing such relics as I work through the province adding more detail. I'll unrevert your revert. G. Timothy Walton ( talk) 22:27, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm AppalachianCentrist. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. If you continue to hound me, I will report your behavior to Wikipedia administrators. AppalachianCentrist ( talk) 17:20, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Any chance you could have a look at the reverted edits on this page again? I think the newbie was very well intentioned and although he may have strayed on the headings was adding some useful stuff. We need new editors!! YellowFratello ( talk) 18:37, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
It says on the bottom that it is inclusive of every city that is included in the megaregion of the RPA. Jhenderson 777 16:43, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
I am aware of the guidelines and I do feel like they help the reader. Sorry if you disagree. I trimmed the Navbox about metros with only particular cities in mind now. Because I feel went overboard. Though I still feel that this is leaning to favoritism on articles you are passionate on. Saying something is obscure is almost leaning on not liking an article topic though leading on obscure topics can be good to me. So I agree to disagree. Jhenderson 777 19:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Just to let you know, the warning I posted on Ttgrcr25's talk page was already for the unexplained content removal at Rogers County, Oklahoma, but I didn't revert it myself because I had already reverted that article twice. This user is also removing content from other Oklahoma-related articles without explanation. TornadoLGS ( talk) 22:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
The article List of Chevrolet Corvette owners has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
See WP:CARTRIVIA, WP:IPC, WP:LC. Note the lack of other "people who own a thing" lists.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Vossanova
o<
17:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Chevrolet Corvette owners is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Chevrolet Corvette owners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vossanova o< 18:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Please do not exploit the workers. 98.185.165.232 ( talk) 20:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to File:2018 Bean Station Sewer Master Plan.jpeg can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Per WP:Hound AppalachianCentrist ( talk) 15:34, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2018 Bean Station Sewer Master Plan.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber ( talk) 15:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Your attention is called to the addition of this display to the article on the Central Business District, Los Angeles (1880s-1890s). Do you have any feelings, for or against? Discussion should take place on that article's Talk page. Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 18:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi Magnolia667, I'm new to this. I was looking at the Wikipedia page for the school system I've taught in for the last 17 years (my wife recently retired after 30 years in that system) and it was horribly out of date. I updated board members. Then I added a section on unions modeled after a similar section in Kanawha County Schools (the largest school system in the state). Can you tell me why that was deleted? What makes it unacceptable when the section in Kanawha County Schools is acceptable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregcruey ( talk • contribs) 22:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello Magnolia677, I just added a new composition, information about Wiggins' music publisher, and four new sources to the Mary Wiggins page you proposed for deletion. I am choosing female composers to write about from
a list based on Aaron I. Cohen's International Encyclopedia of Women Composers. I believe that Cohen's decision to include these women in his book, and wikipedia's decision to use his book, means that these composers made significant musical contributions. However, his book was published in 1987 and I do wonder if we should be working from a more current source! If you have further concerns about the relevance of these composers, perhaps you could mention it whoever is in charge of this project. Thank you for taking the time to read my article on Mary Wiggins. Sincerely, T. E. Meeks ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by T. E. Meeks ( talk • contribs) 19:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Read and heed. User:Vmavanti Vmavanti ( talk) 14:16, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
If you're going to write "please discuss" in an edit summary, you have to actually start a discussion on the talk page. Otherwise you're just editing in bad faith. 24.183.75.20 ( talk) 16:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.