Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2024 Venezuelan presidential election have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the
Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2024 Venezuelan presidential election was changed by Magi Merlin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861712 on 2024-06-26T02:51:44+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 02:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Please read WP:RS and refrain from adding polls from non-reliable sources to Wikipedia. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 17:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
2024 Venezuelan presidential election. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 17:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't deleted any already present content.
- New data have been added .
- The sources are reliable.
Magi Merlin (
talk)
18:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- In addition to blatant edit warring, you have now blanked considerable cited text. [1] I suggest self-reverting there. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Third warning (and text blanking)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary, as you did at
2024 Venezuelan presidential election.
-- Dustfreeworld ( talk) 19:18, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Magi Merlin, please stop. [3] El Universal is not an independent source, and reliable independent sources have clearly discredited these new "pollsters". You are edit warring and causing disruption to other editors. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 19:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
SandyGeorgia (
Talk)
19:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Aoidh (
talk)
22:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. I'm
Dustfreeworld, one of the thousands of editors here. Below are some pages that you might find helpful:
While editing Wikipedia:
|
| If you have any questions, check out the Teahouse or ask me on my talk page. Please sign your messages on discussion pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, welcome! ---- Dustfreeworld ( talk) 03:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC) |
Thank you for contributing to the article
2024 Venezuelan presidential election. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be
verifiable through
reliable sources, preferably using
inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at
Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the
Teahouse. Thank you.
Please stop adding unreliable sources (e.g. El Universal) to article:
The unreliable source you added is listed on this page and is "currently generally unreliable for politic":
An editor has reverted your problematic edits but you edit warred them back. You even removed the tags ( unreliable source? ) they added [4]. Deliberately adding unreliable source to an article so many times as you did are disruptive and tendentious. That is unacceptable. -- Dustfreeworld ( talk) 03:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC); -- Dustfreeworld ( talk) 09:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.