A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Kahuta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Kahuta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ratnahastin ( talk) 04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply

hi waleed are you a baloch? 178.153.233.66 ( talk) 22:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I am pothohari Punjabi Waleed ( talk) 01:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, M Waleed! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! jengod ( talk) 02:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Azm-e-Istehkam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bagh.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Shayetet 7, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 ( talk) 00:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Bbb23, check it now Waleed ( talk) 01:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Parts of it are still ugly. You need to fix the images at a minimum.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:02, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Images in commanders section? Waleed ( talk) 01:02, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Bbb23, I've resolved the issue and moved it to mainspace after adding like 20+ more sources Waleed ( talk) 01:14, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

You didn't fix the issue, but I did. The page now looks at least reasonably normal. Have fun.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

I thought that commanders pics were on the right side and that maybe an issue, Anyways thanks a lot Waleed ( talk) 02:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi M Waleed. I've closed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/InfoHistoric23#07 May 2024 with the only action being this warning. You admitted to off-wiki coordination with a now-blocked editor. I need you to understand that further off-wiki coordination will almost certainly lead to a block. Can you please confirm that understanding, and commit to avoiding such coordination in the future? Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 18:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC) reply

I affirm that there will be no more off wiki coordination and I also affirm that info historic has been banned for copyright violations so you don't have to worry about that Waleed ( talk) 05:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC) reply