This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives | |
---|---|
2006 | |
2007 | |
2008 | |
2009 | |
2010 | |
2011 | |
2012 | |
2013 | |
2018 | |
2019 | |
2020 | |
2021 | |
Conversations are archived manually |
This Archive Page goes from 1/4/2009 to 30/4/2009 (dd/mm/yyyy)
Previous conversations prior to 1 April 2009 (UTC) are archived there.
Merci pour l'exception dans le blocage d'IP pour User:MystBot. Et merci aussi pour le crosspost, sinon je n'aurai pas vu. Je pense changer dans l'année de dedibox et malheuresement d'IP (Merci dedibox...), je te contacterais à ce moment. Encore merci. Myst ( talk) 22:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
I still don't see why you hard blocked thousands of computer, just because there might be some open proxies among them... In fact, have you even checked that the four dedibox involved in the recent sockpuppetry case, on which it seems that you based your decision, are open proxies? They don't seem to have any of the usual open-proxy ports open. Anyway, imho open proxies should be dealt individually. If you have a better reason that "there are a few open proxies among the 65000 IP, so I blocked them all", please explain it. 81.249.4.91 ( talk) 10:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Hah! I have no idea how you go around looking for lol catz all the time :P
Don't worry - the Easter Bunny has got over it - let's hope I still get an easter egg from him! :P
The Helpful One 12:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi.. Could you please userfy the deleted page for Bilge Pump (band). Thanks. Circuit ( talk) 16:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Does your bot look for images on en.wiki tagged with {{
NowCommons|File:Some other name.jpg}}
? Is that how it finds images to replace in articles? Thanks, –
Quadell (
talk)
18:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Special:Contributions/76.252.201.97 is doing the same edits as User talk:Buffaloke, so if you could take a look at that too. Thank you, CTJF83 Talk 20:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
In order to prevent your sandbox from violating Wikipedia's fair use policy, I have placed a colon before the title of each of the two images on this page in order to prevent them from displaying as fair use images are not allowed to be used outside of the main article space. Please let me know if you have any questions. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:24, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks...
The reason for the apparent duplication, was to do with another contributor pointing out that sometimes the history wasn't transferring over.
Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
was there a phantom edit? I cancelled my revert a couple of mins ago, and saw you reverting yourself.
anyway, Im gonna take it to the talk page, rather than revert
カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! ( talk) 15:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
The CU log indicates we are following the same leads. I've posted my findings, please chime in with confirmations or corrections! -- Avi ( talk) 22:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Can you restore previous license from Wikipedia please???-- Kozuch ( talk) 19:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I do hope the 'you' is referring to other admins, as I am not one. However, would you be against extending the sock master's block based on the block evasion, and blocking this sock for a year or something?— Dæ dαlus Contribs 07:34, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
While i will not object to replacing the speedy with a prod template on your side, i find the reason "Not a valid speedy. He is most famous for" a little odd for a reason. The article itself was deleted as an A7 with the same content minutes ago before it was recreated. Also, the reference for "Most Famous" is for a weebly site, which is blacklisted on wikipedia's spam blacklist. Besides, how many people put something such as "He is most famous for invention the moon" or something silly? :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 12:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
I reported a few accounts at WP:SPI but it was declined as the accounts were already blocked, a few more accounts have been created since then recently blocked accounts include User:Yak breederz, User:Z Karz, User:Ay Bee Sea, User:General Hideki Tojo, User:Eee Zee 99, User:Fred Riley 1972 and User:Gargan Tchewan. — Snigbrook 16:53, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Oh it's OK, don't worry about it. It just threw me for a minute or so, but all sorted now. Mabalu ( talk) 21:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, could anything be done about it? There's constant vandalism and sock puppetry from that IP range. Sometimes the accounts get quickly blocked when I report (as you happened to do), sometimes I get sort of reprimanded for not 'proving' enough (though a quick look into contributions list concerned would reveal it was recently obvious sock puppetry again). What this user has been doing for months (since September 2008!) is introducing deliberate errors: sometimes [1] they can be qualified as extreme POV/OR, sometimes patent nonsense [2], [3]. The person behind that IP range is unwilling to discuss or substantiate his changes in any meaningful sense, instead, he is as persistent as an idiot: [4], [5]. Having to revert his nonsensical changes in those infoboxes is like pain in the ass. -- Miacek (t) 19:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
There are new message for you at this noticeboard here.— Dæ dαlus Contribs 22:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
When fighting an IP vandal targeting articles, it is nice for the rest of us if you include those conditions in the filter so it can keep the runtime down. Wikipedia:Abuse filter/Performance provides comparative statistics on normal performance. This report shows data from just before you disabled 157. Dragons flight ( talk) 12:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Lucasbfr, since you were the unblocking admin in the case of this user, would you please take a look at his talk page, user page, and contributions, and re-evaluate the situation? Note that he created the user page with the spam material after he got a level 4 warning about adding it to articles. Thanks, Lady of Shalott 21:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)