|
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Ganesha, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. As
Abecedare mentioned several months ago, please explain your reasons on the article talk page.
Moksha88 (
talk)
02:24, 17 December 2019 (UTC)+
I'm making it succinct. There is no reason to be appalled or question my harmless edits. It was repetitive, therefore needed to be succinct (your "valid" reason). Please do not revert my constructive edits.
I have also provided very informative edits that are not "repetitive" but paramount to the said descriptions, as how other diety's pages are.
Hello User i observe u recently made some edits on Durga page although edits doesnt seem constructive or neccessary & neither u provide any suitable citations for ur changes.Kindly note that Wikipedia needs reliable citation to establish some facts.I revert edits if u want to edit again please do but with Good sources and Consensous on Talk page. Cheers. Aristocratic 536 ( talk) 03:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:20, 23 October 2020 (UTC)Lk568354 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Insert your reason to be unblocked here There is no reason for me to be blocked. I found this insulting and disrespectful. Apparently the one who was deleting my edit of consort for Durga has some issue with a paramount characteristic that describes Durga, a characteristic that has been there for years. And why is it that my edit is still deleted? This shows honoring of the other person's asinine warring over my edit to maintain something good that has always been there for years since its inception. This doesn't even require a dispute. Just as it's not disputable that the first President of the United States is George Washington
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. only ( talk) 00:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lk568354 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here I simply added back what was already there for many years. The fact that you blocked me, didn't provide legitimate reason to why you declined my unblock request, and continue to allow the page to be as according to that warring child, is frankly disrespectful and biased.
Decline reason:
This does not address your edit warring. 331dot ( talk) 08:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thanks for responding. I need to know how to access the talk page. But I'm sure who ever is the other editor was a child. I hope to find time later to access the talk page as time is limited for me. But some information is absolutely crucial and cannot be refuted. If the prophet Muhammad was declared gay and the topic was brought up for refuting in its talk page, that would cause a lot of commotion and protest, even if it was brought up in the talk page. So I feel like going that route with a child is nonsensical.
Hello, I'm
MRRaja001. An edit that you recently made to
Durga seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. The article is about multiple traditions and cultures. So please don't add content in a biased way.
MRRaja001 (
talk)
07:39, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi Lk568354, i've added you to WP:DRN - Here's the link for it. Please participate there let's resolve the issue. - MRRaja001 ( talk) 05:10, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
.🪔HappyDeepawali🪔May this festival bring peace and blessings to you and your family • .💠245CMR💠.• 👥 📜 10:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi, the issue is closed and please don't edit the note again. - MRRaja001 ( talk) 12:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC) The issue has not been closed. She is not a celebate, not even in Vaishnavism. This is an insult to our goddess.
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Adi Parashakti, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
MRRaja001 (
talk)
14:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
You see, I want to clarify one thing for you, In Vaishnavism, Durga is considered a form of Lakshmi who is the wife of Vishnu. In Shivaism and Shaktism, Lakshmi is considered a form of Durga who is the wife of Shiva. Removing Shiva from the infobox is an insult to our goddess Shakti, because we cannot worship a mother without a father. Adi ParaShakti (or Shakti) is simply and predominantly associated with Shiva and yes Vaishnavism and other religions have adopted that term, but it is primarily associated with Shiva. You seem biased and you're probably brainwashed into keeping women celibate and promoting celibacy, which is evil (and radical just like many Muslim beliefs). Please do not divorce adi parashakti from AdiShiva. If there is any final definition of Adi ParaShakti, it's Shiva. Removing this fact is a disservice to her page. Om shanti.
Hello, I'm
MelecieDiancie. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Durga without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
•Melecie!• ~
talk~
04:40, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Durga, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that.
WhoAteMyButter (
📨talk│
📝contribs)
04:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
•Melecie!• ~ talk~ 05:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahadevi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mahadev. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)