|
Hello, Littlecass, and welcome to Wikipedia. We are very excited to see you beginning to edit Wikipedia and its various articles and related pages. We hope that your journey and quest as a Wikipedian is successful, fruitful, and full of both successes and fruits.-- Der Elbenkoenig ( talk) 14:46, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you very much,Der Elbenkoenig!!! I am definitely confused by Wikipedia's process...I have never been particularly skilled with computers, let alone coding for a website. I definitely foresee myself encountering many problems. I hope I can receive help as I continue with my efforts to edit Wikipedia pages! :) --LittleCass 15:41, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
How many do you have on your mushroom? (LittleCass 20:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC))
I have five books now and a total of 10 references I believe, I don't think there will be many more.-- Krustev LeMont ( talk) 00:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Nice. I need to find some more. I don't have a problem finding information, but I have been using the same five resources because they are descriptive. How is your page coming along? (LittleCass 01:24, 14 November 2011 (UTC))
Its going, im not sure how good it is but most of the information i need is there i think.-- Krustev LeMont ( talk) 03:09, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
In this section, I will begin to briefly elaborate on the main things I have learned from Wikipedia!
Technical Aspects:
Overall, I believe two of the most important things I walked away with from this project are: first off, my knowledge gain about referencing. As a high school student, I have only written one research paper and the whole process was horrific. Wikipedia has truly helped me understand the referencing process and I believe this project has prepared me the most for future college papers...I think that's a big deal. Also, Wikipedia conveyed to me the true "scientific process." It is time consuming, but very rewarding. When I first took on the project, I was incredibly nervous. However, after dedicating time and brain power, I have discovered myself to be proud of what I have contributed to Wikipedia. I find myself showing my friends and family my article... I truly developed an interest in the lined seahorse. I respect those who contribute regularly and better the Wikipedia database--it is definitely underestimated.
Hey, this is not something that you have to do but if are able to find some time counld you look over my article and see if there is anything you see that might need correcting. And this wouldd also be good for group colaberation. Captain kirkintosh ( talk) 21:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, definitely. I'll take a look at it Sunday if that is okay. Would you be willing to take a look at mine then as well? (LittleCass 23:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC))
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
16:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lined Seahorse.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)