|
Just a heads up here, so to make it clear: The visual editor takes in the parameters of each template as they are presented in the respective documentation, and as you can see at Template:Infobox video game, this is the way it was sorted by consensus, even if it appears differently in the article (such as here it is split in three different categories, which makes it logical and easy to use). No matter what you do, the visual editor will change it, and therefore it is not worth fighting about, as there will quite definetly be someone who will use it (such as my proof edit, haha). Cheers and happy editing! Lordtobi ( ✉) 15:02, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
TheOldJacobite. I noticed that you recently removed content from
The Grand Budapest Hotel without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
The Old Jacobite
The '45
13:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Instant noodle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruneian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, LightKeyDarkBlade. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Read Amiga. SNAAAAKE!! ( talk) 10:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Stop removing sourced information, As of Nov 10, 2019, Comscore has reported WW box office as $175,492,409 and reported that it was running in 13 Territories, In Box Office Mojo it has figures only from 9 Territories, So that extra amount comes from these not tracked territories, you have add them to reflect actual gross. Panda619 ( talk) 23:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
As an editor who commented at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film between Jan. 1, 2019, and today, you may wish to join a discussion at that page, here.-- Tenebrae ( talk) 00:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RNA virus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SARS-CoV ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:46, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Hey there! I noticed that you had edited the Ark page recently and I was wondering if you could possible add a section dedicated to the mobs. As in a list of mobs organized by DLC and mobs that come pre-DLC so that people can know what to actually expect when they purchase the game so they don’t get disappointed. Thanks! Antman2002 ( talk) 20:39, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
How come you won't accept that Virtua Fighter 5 is the final game in its franchise? The Virtua Fighter series hasn't had a new installment in 14 years. 172.250.44.165 ( talk) 10:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks!
Terasail
[✉]
16:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
In the article about Sniper Ghost Warrior Contracts 2 it is written: "Soon after the game was released, it received >>mixed or average reviews<<".
Actually, soon after release the game had positive reviews on XboxX. The scores dropped later. Here you have screen-shot.
http://mickey.ugu.pl/MetaCritic/SGWC2_XboxX.JPG
You can also check the history on metacritic yourself.
You can do it by:
1) finding Sniper Ghost Warrior Contracts 2 for XBox X on metacritic;
2) clicking Critic Reviews to get all the critic reviews;
3) click By date.
You can find that soon after publishing the game received two scores of 80, one of 85 and one score of 70. It was enough to call them positive reviews. The scores dropped 11 days later with the review from IGN. Hence, the version for XBOX X received mostly positive reviews "*Soon after* the game was released," but the average score dropped with the review from IGN. MichalZim ( talk) 08:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
"(Don't simply remove stuff like that, Cuvtixo. Even removing lines that separate the paragraphs. My goodness. You're destroying the page.)"
The page has three
![]() | This section needs expansion. You can help by
adding to it. (June 2015) |
and one
![]() | This user page needs to be updated. Please help update this user page to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. (April 2013) |
I think the page probably should be destroyed. Its been 9 years since the "update" was asked for, let's face it, it's never going to be updated. I think the article should be deleted really, don't you? Cuvtixo ( talk) 18:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Thea: The Awakening. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 17:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)