This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lifebaka/Archive_2. |
![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Lifebaka has not edited Wikipedia since January 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives
| |
|
Please add new comments in new sections. I will respond to messages here unless you ask otherwise. Or, if you're notifying me of a problem, I'll probably just fix it and leave it at that. I can also be contacted by email.
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
There is an article in the Deletion Review for "Gabriel Murphy" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Gabriel_Murphy. This was an article that was created in February of this year with limited content. Soon after its creation, a request for deletion was made with a subsequent discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gabriel_Murphy. The decision by User:SoHoLand was to redirect the article to Aplus.Net.
In May, the article was recreated with 16 sources from various newspapers and magazines within the article, based on feedback by several users on the request for deletion discussion. However, user User:SoHoLand continues to redirect the article to Aplus.Net, even though the article contains more sourced information than Aplus.Net. I believe this article meets WP:BIO as some users pointed out on the deletion discussion. User:SoHoLand suggested that the article go up on deletion review to consider whether it should be a seperate article. I did this on June 2, and if you review the deletion review discussion the majority agree to overturn. However, User:SoHoLand will not do such. I was hoping you could chime-in on the discussion and offer some assistance. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.76.132.152 ( talk) 02:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello Lifebaka- an admin (
C.Fred) let me re-write the "Gabriel Murphy" article in my user sandbox. I have taken a considerable amount of time to make sure everything I possibly can is cited by independent sources. I now have 44 total references and I think over a dozen different sources. If you have the time, I would appreciate it if you would review the article before I re-open a deletion review. If you can review it and leave me a message with your thoughts as to whether you feel it is solid and likely to be approved as a stand-alone article or otherwise what areas need work, I would really appreciate it. Thank you for your time and consideration.
The article is located at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LakeBoater/Gabriel_Murphy LakeBoater ( talk) 01:19, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't think I even realised I was deleting the tag. I just put some stuff in while i typed the actual article, then pasted over the top of it all.
I'm including some links to other sites that mention We tell Stories, i hope that helps. OldBareQuillster ( talk) 01:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
On the Zane Morris page, the only question I have it on the citation needed, is that okay to be on there meaning it's not going to cause problems? what does it mean? Let me know if there's anything I need to do. Thanks! Hyperbeard ( talk) 16:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
<ref></ref>
tags. I'd add some myself, but I don't know where to find the information. --
lifebaka (
Talk -
Contribs)
23:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC)I'm confused on how to make comment on the "Don't Delete this page" task.
I did post a copy here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SimonT_Hockey_Simulator#SimonT_Hockey_Simulator
Is that correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonT-Pycos ( talk • contribs) 18:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I removed the Prod. Since it was a French film with an article in the French WP, I looked there and found some info, such as its awards, and references. I made a start at translating and bringing it into ours. DGG ( talk) 17:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
You commented a few days ago on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funding Evil concerning the article Funding Evil. I've completely rewritten and expanded the article now; you may wish to review the revised article and your comments in the deletion discussion. -- ChrisO ( talk) 16:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Does that mean that the considered for deletion box can be removed now from the article? Hyperbeard ( talk) 23:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Regarding:
Hi: I am the author of the Canada Health Care Provider's piece. I noticed your comment on the page and have updated the page based on the your comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enmoregirl ( talk • contribs) 19:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello:
I treid to put my article into a category under Healthcare in Canada but for some reasons it won't show up as a subcategory of 'Healthcare in Canada'. Would you able to look into it and inform us of how to resolve this issue.
Also, since we have updated our article based on the feedback from you (re: citation) can we remove the tag on top of the article i.e. original research and citation.
Thank you, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enmoregirl ( talk • contribs) 13:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
[[Category:<category>]]
at the bottom of the article. I'll go ahead and look for some to add. --
lifebaka (
Talk -
Contribs)
13:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Thank you very much for your feedback. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enmoregirl ( talk • contribs) 18:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
For some reason the article is not under the category 'Healthcare in Canada' Can you please help us out in this matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enmoregirl ( talk • contribs) 13:54, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Could you please check on what I did at the Deletion Review [1] of Dark and Shattered Lands Further action is up to you. DGG ( talk) 18:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
I've got a watchlist notifier script. ;-) Happy April Fools'. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 00:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
Aprils fools day was a blast. Loads of users lightened up to have good old fashion fun. I want to thank you for taking part in editing this page in particular and even though I may not know you, embrace the same talk pages, or even edit with you in the near future, I'd like to award you this Barnstar for making Wikipedia a fun environment in which to contribute. Until next year. :) SynergeticMaggot ( talk) 13:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For removing the unwarranted {{db-user}} on my user page. And don't worry about it. The {{user Vandalized}} template there is a badge of honour to me. Blanchardb- Me• MyEars• MyMouth-timed 00:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC) |
Hi,
Sorry about removing the speedy deletion template. I did add a {{ hangon}} template to the head of the article, and I thought I could remove the template if the concerns were addressed.
BTW, I noticed that the article was deleted even though I did address the concerns. What is my next step?
Webbbbbbber ( talk) 17:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Please do not restore unreferenced information as you did to Kuljit Takhar. Please reread the verifiability and biographies of living persons policies. -- Jeandré, 2008-04-05 t21:35z
I noticed you updated the redirect link for this episode, thank you for making it more relevant. I recently got a really weird warning about some kind of threat to deletion for it, but I am unable to find it. Since you edited it more recently than me I was hoping you might know something? You did not seem to get such a warning judging by your talkpage though. Tyciol ( talk) 00:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
...for fixing my oversight and removing the speedy deletion tag that I neglected to remove.-- Kubigula ( talk) 22:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
My first page, featuring Bonnie Bloomfield, has been marked for "speedy deletion" and I don't know why. She is a real author, and The Slate Hill Covenant is a real novel. While she is not--yet--famous, why is she less worthy of consideration than the countless other authors on Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wacky immortal ( talk • contribs) 23:35, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
I have a page (Sacredsorrow) that is scheduled for deletion and I was curious of what I should do to stop this from happening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SacredSorrow ( talk • contribs) 14:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Are you kidding me? Did you actually read it?
...for example. -- Roleplayer ( talk) 19:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Lifebaka, i just got a message welcoming me. Wasn't sure if it was automated, seemed it. But anyway, i was just curious about my first contribution. I made a topic about a website, and i hadnt added much content, so it came under speedy deletion. I spoke in the talk page, and its still under speedy deletion. Its been an hour now, do you know whats up? Maybe you could take a look? check my contributions. Thanks -Sam Smanic88 ( talk) 19:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
i've edited the page. Maybe you'd like to take a look now? I think it stands up to the rules and shouldn't be marked for speedy deletion now. I have added its notability and achievements. Aswell as a small bit on its history. Smanic88 ( talk) 20:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Alright dude! no worries. Thanks for the help anyway. :] 134.220.186.129 ( talk) 14:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry I didn't follow that sequence of edits on my talk page. What was it about? Generally I don't care much for the obsession with civility around here, when it gets in the way of good content. The Rationalist ( talk) 20:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
First of all: how can anyone possibly construe the following as "incivility"?:
"I am not participating anymore, but feel somewhat sorry for this poor woman, N.G. Nugmanova (author of the the article), with her "Russian conspiracy" paranoia. Perhaps you, or someone else, could gently help her with this by pointing out that there is a very easy way to determine the geographical location of any anonymous IP address, using one of the standard IP address locator services available on the net." 24.202.238.172 (talk) 13:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC) (alias: "R Physicist")"
Moreover, this was not posted as part of the AfD debate, but as a discrete comment at another user's "talk" page. Isn't it clear that I was actually trying to help her (without getting drawn again into the debate)? (I had even considered leaving this same message for you, since you seemed to want further to help her.)
The fact is, NGN's accusations of "Russian" anonymous contributions to the previous AfD debate were completely off mark, as can easily be verified (and has already been done). They formed part of the nastiness of the previous debate, as you well know. Repeating this within the present AfD discussion, again and again, just makes her look worse. Making false accusations, and repeating them even after they have been demontstrated to be false, can only make the accuser look more and more foolish.
Even this well-meant gesture of mine has been interpreted by her in an insulting way. She has simply lost all perspective, and is acting against her own best interests.
Finally, you should know, as well as anyone, that I offered twice, during the previous AfD discussion, to communicate with her directly, via e-mail, but she declined. I am now no longer willing to do so, since I regard her increasingly shrill outbursts and ad hominem attacks as beyond any reasonable bounds of civility.
I cannot comprehend why you would want to continue acting as her advocate. 24.202.238.172 ( talk) 21:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC) (alias "R Physicist")
Thanks for the suggestions, Lifebaka. I think the article is noteworthy; I understand the need to have a bar somewhere, though. Look, the series has stirred up enough interest in Northern Ireland to merit interest here ( http://www.culturenorthernireland.org/article.aspx?art_id=163) and a couple of printed articles. It doesn't have the audience of Kate Modern, but it's essentially from the same school and is the work of an up-and-coming local film-maker. It uses innovative techniques to involve the audience, and has a small but growing audience on You Tube (measured by views) and on the website. Is this too parochial?
Sneekie ( talk) 14:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
Yesterday (28th) you stated in a delete review that the Bloodstained Memoirs page (which is currently only a page in my user space - User:Commoncase/Bloodstained_Memoirs) should be put back as an actual article in the main Wiki (preferably as "Bloodstained Memoirs"). Do you take care of putting the page back up as an actual Wiki article? Could you please advise which areas you think would need more referencing, and I will research the production some more and attempt to do so. Thanks Commoncase ( talk) 11:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Dear Lifebaka,
May I kindly ask you to observe the deletion review page for the above. I'd like to hear your thoughts on the matter as I sincerely belioeve this article should be in the main Wiki. Commoncase ( talk) 08:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Lifebaka, thanks for welcoming me. I do have a question, which I would appreciate your help with, if you could, please. In this deletion review that I've initiated, some people vote "List at Afd" -- what does it mean? Is that something that I should do? (now, or wait until consensus?) Thank you! Oxda ( talk) 19:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your welcome, but I have been with wikipedia for a while now and I am pretty familiar with everything. I do learn new stuff each day and am finding this a fun thing. That's pretty much it, thanks again! Hooty88888 ( talk) 14:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
I wanted to let you know that I left some additional comments on this page Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 12-- Kumioko ( talk) 17:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
You're doing pretty much exactly what I'd have done if I'd been bold enough. Good job. Guest9999 ( talk) 00:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Remember me!!! I created JG-E. Which by the way is deleted as you might see. Anyway I agree to deleting Banjo-Kazooie: Sky's the Limit. Yet again I created. Can you add the speedy deletion tag on it!!!!-- Anfish ( talk) 00:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Please look at :
This is to Review the deletion of the Wallace Collins, Esq page and to show that he does have Notoriety
His Notability & Notoriety is evident in that he has been cited in Major Newspaper and Music Trade Pubs, and he has made case Law in the Copyright and Trademark arenas.
Please look at his page if i did it wrong then i need someone to put a Wikipedia page up that knows what they are doing this is all very confusing to me.
http://www.wallacecollins.com/
Under his legal victories you can see the articles that have been reported on him such as; http://www.wallacecollins.com/la.html
Making Case Law
http://www.wallacecollins.com/whoomp/wcaw5.jpg http://www.wallacecollins.com/whoomp/wcaw4.jpg http://www.wallacecollins.com/whoomp/wcaw3.jpg http://www.wallacecollins.com/whoomp/wcaw2.jpg
These are just some examples. I have added this info on the Deletion Review page Thank you
-- Hermit711 ( talk) 16:26, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I have read the Deletion reasons from Spellcaster and i find them to be unfair and he did not do his homework
He stated that he could only find a mirror of Wallace's website however i have it posted above and it is not a mirror .. He said he could not find articles and case law i have stated these then and above. and he could not find where Wallace was a recording artist i had not been able to put that up due to no puter for a week but here is that info and again Spellcaster did not do his her job and was snide about it to boot. His band was THE DYNOMITERS They were featured in 16 Magazine and other teen magazines and got press in the trades we were signed to Epic Records in 76 the most notable song was' "Rock & Roll President"'.
I believe that Spellcaster deleted this article without doing any checking and not caring and i would like it reinstated.
There was no reason for the comments in spellcasters remarks below:
SPELLCASTERS COMMENTS: Wallace Collins, Esq.
Wallace Collins, Esq. (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)
Allegedly notable attorney. Looks more like an advert for his business (I've removed one more spammy part) Declined WP:CSD#A7 speedy. Pedro : Chat 09:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
END SPELLCASTERS COMMENTS
--
Hermit711 (
talk)
17:02, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your response on my DR. I was beginning to become disillusioned with the whole Wikipedia concept I so entusiastically embraced. Jheiv ( talk) 01:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I believe the reference I have provided for optical granulometry and photoanalysis is a sufficient source of information. Also, how do I go about categorizing my information? This should be considered relevant to the mining industry.
Thanks,
Mark Wagner —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wipware ( talk • contribs) 18:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice! It is greatly appreciated
Mark Wagner —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wipware ( talk • contribs) 18:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
After doing what you told me to in regards to referencing my articles in a new section, it is still saying that my entry is not properly cited. Can you check this over and see if I have completed it correctly? It would be greatly appreciated.
Articles: Optical Granulometry Photoanalysis
Thanks,
Mark Wipware ( talk) 14:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
I really appreciate how you helped organize my undelete request. I was trying to figure out how to fix it, but you did a much better job by far. Thanks!-flamdrenite —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flamdrenite ( talk • contribs) 02:48, May 24, 2008
Maybe a bit hasty declining the speedy? It is also blatant advertising and was created by a blocked user who now appears to be using a sock to embellish it. Harry the Dog WOOF 16:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Noted. I should have paid closer attention, but Twinkle simply lists the category as "Recreation of deleted material". No excuse though, really. Cheers. TN‑ X- Man 16:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi thanks for the welcome note that you gave me helped me to find my way around the wiki. So thanks very much. ILoveFran ( talk) 18:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
I've done a lot of work on the Illogicopedia article, what do you think so far? --— Mr. MetalFlower · chat · what I done did do 18:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Normally, I'd agree with you, but this has already been deleted three times as nearly incomprehensible nonsense by an out-and-out vandal with gibberish for a username. With all due respect, I'd like to request that the speedy be restored. This person has been disrupting the site for nearly an hour. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 02:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
I think so. The redirect might be of some help and I'll let an admin deal with the username and the 3RR. Take care. :) -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 02:44, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
PMDrive1061 (
talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Lifebaka,
Sorry to bother you but I own the copyright to the material on Seafield Grammar School. I wanted to release the information to as many people as possible as there is very little information available on the school on the internet. All the information on Wikipedia and my webiste is my own, and thus there are no sources as information has been collected from primary sources and not books or online articles. I apologise for what has happened as I am not very experienced on Wikipedia. I would greatly appreciate your help in resolving this as I do not want the info to be deleted because of my ineptitude on Wikipedia.
Apologies,
Dustybooks89 ( talk) 14:21, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
It is an unusual move, but precedented. I did a bunch of them (sometimes as many as 3 a day) back in and around March of 2007. At that time, we had a primary DRV closer who closed almost everything on day 6 or 5. If it needed more input, we'd relist at that point. Right now we don't have a primary closer, nor are we quite as timely on closing. I think that is a mixed blessing... multiple closers is good, but being less timely isn't so good. GRBerry 16:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Where does it say [2] is in the public domain? Linking to a federal webpage at the bottom doesn't mean it's public domain. -- Rividian ( talk) 15:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
importScript('User:Ais523/adminrights.js');
to
your monobook.js page. It'll highlight links to the user: and user talk: pages of admins. Cheers. --
lifebaka (
Talk -
Contribs)
16:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)What if wikipedia's information was divided into categories that of which we as wikipedians could have captains for and each category would be that captains area to watch for vandals and then bust them. Think of it, no more would wikipedia be ridiculed for being to unreliable, instead making it a utopia for reliable information. We could have a counsel to reign over us and such. We'd be in shadows of each domain waiting for vandals and then we'd bust them! It could be marvelous. Though it would not change wikipedia's information. Tell me what you think for this is the vandal buster neoonyxalchemist. Just think as founders we'd be making Wikipedia history. Come look at my page for more info. Neoonyxalchemist1 22:39 7 June 2008
You chimed in at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_June_8#List_of_environmental_websites with a vote of "overturn". I just wanted to make sure you'd based that on the right AfD, since the nominator had initially linked to the AfD for List of environmental periodicals, not List of environmental websites, which is what this DR is for. eaolson ( talk) 02:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
I think the original author knows some stuff about auctions, but hasn't figured out yet how to fit them into encyclopedic articles. My feeling about "Swedish auction" is that there's some material there which could be usefully added to other articles. And there's still a chance that it deserves its own article, though I haven't seen justification for it yet. Cretog8 ( talk) 14:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Okay, this is quite embaracing. This view source button disappears, when you click on discussion...I learned a lesson. Thanks also for your description of the templates, but I am a step away of that..I just learned that I can copy paste things I write often into a template. Sometime soon.. All the best
Georg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorgusch ( talk • contribs) 17:22, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
For some odd reason my DVD disc is skipping, but anyway my DVD of the Aliens Special Edition includes a scene in which Ripley is handed a photograph of her daughter. The photograph includes the deceased daughter's "DB" and "DECEASED" dates (years, months, days). The dialogue says that the daughter died 2 years prior to the events in which the scene takes place and the DVD description text says Aliens takes place 57 years after Alien. Also, if you watch the next scene in which Ripley is talking with all of the company types and look at the screen with green letters, you will see dates included in that text as well. I'll have to watch all the movies again to see if there are other such inclusion of dates as well and again would have to check again if they match the article's dates, but in any event, there are at least two scenes in the special edition of Aliens that do in fact satisfy that aspect of the primary source element by displaying specific dates down to the days and months even. Sincerely, -- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles Tally-ho! 21:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Ref to this edit, of course the article is A1 ! Look at the first line : Barkha Bisht is an actress who is also a talk host on some show - Amog | Talk • contribs 13:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Drop me a note on my talk page once you have answered the questions and I will have a look over them. Davewild ( talk) 17:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Just letting you know that you have email. Mahalo. -- Ali'i 19:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
the examples can be located here. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for !voting on my RfA. If you supported, I'll make sure your confidence is not misplaced; if you opposed, I'll take your criticism into account and try to adjust my behavior accordingly.
See you around the wiki!-- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 00:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Lifebaka - just left a message for Davewild as well. in which i said... i teach multimedia art classes and think i could elaborate Jamie Allen's entry as required (i refer to his work now and again when i teach, which is how i noticed that his entry had been deleted - it was quite bad before :). trying to make sure we don't overlook more recent artist and scholars in this area... Thanks for your comments - will roll into the userfy'd version... cheers - jer78
Congratualtions! weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 19:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
<div style="position: fixed; left:1; right:0; bottom:0; display:block; ">
[[Image:718smiley.png|100px|left]]
</div>
Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the administrators' how-to guide and the administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. Also, the practice exercises at the new admin school may be useful. If you have any questions, get in touch on my talk page. WjB scribe 19:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
V A N D A L I S M Beam 19:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
This congratulating comment is not a sarcasm or bad-faith fake comment toward your successful RFA. I've seen you working around and, clearly your contributions impress many good and respectable people. I appear to be the only person to oppose you because not only the WP:DRV, but also my usual impression on you is not stronger than your name, baka. I don't know whether it holds other meanings, but indicates fool or dumb in Japanese.... This may sound silly to you, but you will see my pickiness over username like this. Regardless of my opposition, you become an administrator with a lot of supports. I believe that you would do not dismay people in future. Anyway, I appreciate your interest in some dispute with somebody. Regards -- Caspian blue ( talk) 20:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful request for adminship. I am glad you passed, and you are welcome for the support. For information on using your new tools, see the school for new admins; you will find it very useful. Good luck! Acalamari 20:51, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |