Please see
WP:BLANKING. Blanking a message is also considered acknowledgement of its reception and there is no point in posting again a message someone already read. Thank you, —
PaleoNeonate –
05:32, 23 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Indeed, it is user generated (
WP:USERGEN) and not edited and published independently (hence also self-published,
WP:SPS). In relation to lies, I can't comment without more context, but if the source is reliable the conclusions are less likely to be lies. —
PaleoNeonate –
23:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Thanks. I understand that verifiability is a core tenant of editing this encyclopedia. I also appreciate that Wikipedia cannot be cited as an independent source for an article hosted by the project.
Lars Frierson (
talk)
06:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC)reply
OK. Are you here to build an encyclopedia, or are you here to push an agenda? I have done as you suggested and brought the issue to
User:Grayfell's attention. In fact, I did that before you even got involved. Have you done the requisite research and learned what this is about? I cited a reliable source - the Encyclopedia of White Power: A Sourcebook on the Radical Racist Right by Jerry Kaplan in the
Ben Klassen article and faithfully reproduced what the source stated.
User:Grayfell reverted, saying that the book is not a reliable source. I find this fascinating, since the book is cited in several articles on Wikipedia concerning its topic. I cited a secondary source for why addition. What did I do wrong?
Lars Frierson (
talk)
06:19, 12 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Your
aspersions are unwelcome and constitute an attack. Please stop. And please don't revert that
POINTy edit again, or you may be sanctioned. I have no idea what you are talking about otherwise.
El_C06:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Alright. I have linked to it several times in messages to you. I will do once again.
Ben Klassen. I recommend that you review the last two revisions to the article before threatening me with sanctions. You do want to be considered objective, right?
Lars Frierson (
talk)
06:34, 12 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Iam not reverting anything, am I? Wjy don't you assume good faith, per Wikipedia policy and stop eating the newbies, or whatever it is called? Look up the recent edits to
Ben Klassen. There is nothing at all wrong with my source. It is an accepted reference on the subject of white supremacy.
Lars Frierson (
talk)
06:41, 12 July 2019 (UTC)reply
You are NOt this stupid. Read the recent revisions of
Ben Klassen. Maybe you ARE this stupid.
Lars Frierson (
talk)
Further
personal attacks will result in sanctions. You seem to suffer from the misapprehension that just because I reverted the IP on that talk page I am now obliged to investigate your dispute — I assure you that this is not the case.
El_C06:54, 12 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Are you suffering from the delusion that I will not report your multiple personal attacks on me? I am asking you to objectively investigate a dispute. apparently you are a privileged Wikipedian to who the rules for "commoners" don't apply.
Lars Frierson (
talk)
06:58, 12 July 2019 (UTC)reply
That is plainly false, I have not personally attacked you. Certainly, you are free to report anything in any forum you see fit.
El_C07:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)reply
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Also, while blocked, please limit further usage of this talk page to an unblock review, or even your access to editing this very talk page may be revoked. Thanks.
El_C07:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)reply