I am currently drafting a clerking proposal because the clerking proposal on WP:RFA2015 is informal and vaguely defined. I do not want to open a multi-phase RfC just to confirm past consensus, so you know of any other major attempts at proposing clerking or similar system at RfA other than Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Clerks? Thanks, Esquivalience t 03:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Please take a look at Newton Public Schools. There is an ongoing dispute between several editors, one of whom is pushing hard on a POV and is to put it mildly, very verbose. Please help if you can. Thanks. John from Idegon ( talk) 18:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Nothing to see here
|
---|
REMEMBER, WE ARE ALL VOLUNTEERS. as are the contributors. Thanks. Letterhead330 ( talk) 23:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC) you have read the english translation of......what? No clue what youre talking about. There is a panel of scientists involved in bosnian pyramids. Clearly, you are focussing on the discoverer in a prejudiced fashion and ignoring all the other contributors to the discovery's proving. Wouldnt you say?
Moreover based on the predictions of this theory, he developed an alternative cosmology that effectively replaces the big bang theory. In fact, in 1986, he was the first to cast doubt on the big bang theory by showing that it makes a far poorer fit to existing astronomical data when compared to this new non-expanding universe cosmology. The subquantum kinetics cosmology also led him to make successful predictions about galaxy evolution that were later verified with the Hubble Space Telescope. Dr. LaViolette is credited with the discovery of the planetary-stellar mass-luminosity relation which demonstrates that the Sun, planets, stars, and supernova explosions are powered by spontaneous energy creation through photon blueshifting. With this relation, he successfully predicted the mass-luminosity ratio of the first brown dwarf to be discovered.More recently, his maser signal blueshifting prediction has found confirmation following publication of the discovery of a blueshift in the Pioneer 10 spacecraft tracking data. Dr. LaViolette is the first to predict that high intensity volleys of cosmic ray particles travel directly to our planet from distant sources in our Galaxy, a phenomenon now confirmed by scientific data. He is also the first to discover high concentrations of cosmic dust in Ice Age polar ice, indicating the occurrence of a global cosmic catastrophe in ancient times.Based on this work, he made predictions about the entry of interstellar dust into the solar system ten years before its confirmation in 1993 by data from the Ulysses spacecraft and by radar observations from New Zealand. He also originated the glacier wave flood theory that not only provides a reasonable scientific explanation for widespread continental floods, but also presents a credible explanation for the sudden freezing of the arctic mammoths and demise of the Pleistocene mammals. Also he developed a novel theory that links geomagnetic flips to the past occurrence of immense solar flare storm outbursts. He is the developer of subquantum kinetics, a novel approach to microphysics that not only accounts for electric, magnetic, gravitational, and nuclear forces in a unified manner, |
Nothing to see here - again
|
---|
http://starburstfound.org/letters-of-support/ Kudpung... presidential letter - didnt realize theyre clickable, it was Reagan -- still a president, and this man invented several quantum and astronomy sciences. This is the letters of support link - you might read it. Your system is geared to reject the very people who create wiki, and something appears awry in that methodology. How exactly can WIKI work out, when you reject volunteers editing wrong info pages? (2006 is last links for the "claimed" now proven pyramids; 2016 is a whole decade of discoveries youre refusing, and I heard of this from Semir's site, but now I know it to be not an accident. Sorry, but I dont see any rectification and the slurs on Dr. La Violette will make interesting video fodder for the way WIKI operates. It is okay for me to document this treatment, and is that alright, or will it be construed as something personal? (all the comments so far avoid fixing the problem and by golly, theyre insulting.) Letterhead330 ( talk) 23:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Superwave Theory • Letter from Senator Packwood to the U.S. National Science Foundation • Letter from Senator Packwood to the U.S. National Science Foundation • Letter from Christopher Lehman, Special Assistant to the President • Letter from Dr. Korotkovitch (Leningrad) to the National Science Foundation • Letter from Senator Kennedy of Massachusetts • Letter from Sir Crispin Tickell UK Mission to the UN • Letter from Wilbert Chagula, Tanzanian ambassador to the UN Cosmology • Letter from professor Georges de Vaucouleur, University of Texas, Austin • Letter from professor Jean-Claude Pecker, College of France and professor Jean-Pierre Vigier, director of research CNRS • Letter from professor Jean-Claude Pecker, College of France • Letter from professor Jean-Pierre Vigier, director of research CNRS • Letter from Grote Reber, father of radio astronomy • Letter from professor Paul Marmet, National Research Council of Canada • Letter from professor Dean Turner, University of Northern Colorado Feeling Tone Theory • Letter from professor Karl Pribram, Neuropsychology Laboratory, Stanford University • Letter from professor Walter Freeman, Division of Neurobiology, UC Berkeley • Letter from professor Ted Packard, Chairman, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah • Letter from professor Richard Rowan, Director of Counseling Services, The Evergreen State College • Letter from Dee Dickinson, Coordinator, New Horizons for Learning • Letter from Hazel Henderson, Co-Director, Princeton Center for Alternative Futures Aerospace Technology: NASA Space Plane Correspondence • Letter from Charles Morris, Asst. Dir. NASA Aero-Space Plane Program • Letter to Charles Morris, Asst. Dir. NASA Aero-Space Plane Program
• Institutional affiliations of people requesting information on Starburst research (1984-1989)
Actually kudpung, Im beginning to see that the many times Ive accepted a WIKI search result questing info, may have been a severe error -- if you seriously intend to keep the bosnian pyramids back in the stone age with spurious links and a very questionable narrative...what of the other pages? This is concerning but, also enlightening at the same time, and I think its best for WIKI to remain as it is, uninformed, touting pure nonsense about some very real and important pyramids, and to cease trying to change what apparently is a very much closed mentality to being current and with the times. :) I will not offer my time to adjust any of your pages in future, because I find WIKI now to be very non-credible and inaccurate, and a poor source of facts in the tradition of spurious sources. Thanks for the impression, and happy volunteering. Letterhead330 ( talk) 23:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC) |
Again, please see the warnings on your talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 23:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Kudpung, kindly "vanish" me...I am quite sorry for having defended WIKI in the past when called spurious and very inaccurate, and realize I was wrong to give WIKI bennie of doubt. Thanks so much. I dont volunteer to be abused. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Letterhead330 ( talk • contribs) 23:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Kudpung,
In a shocking and unbelievable move, you have given my IP a warning for "blatantly harassing" another user. Funny thing is, I was respectfully calling out User talk:John from Idegon for blatantly harassing me and another Wikipedian. He called me an "east coast elistic prick", and said he didn't give a "flying fuck" about the town of another editor, and he gets off scot-free while you have occupied yourself with issuing my IP a warning for "blatant harassment". I challenge you to materialize once instance of "harassment" on my part - you will find only my responses to being harassed by an internet troll. Please tell me Kudpung - are you disgraced by your punitive act against a victim of an ad-hominem verbal attack, while unthinkably ignoring the guilty perpetrator of harassment? If you do not extend this same warning to him, you will have confirmed your utterly inconsistent, unjust, and disparate treatment of Wiki users based on contribution history. Kudpung - can you find one instance of use of profanity by my IP in my respectful and humane discourse? Yet I get warned, after being called an "elitist prick" whose town the troll in question "[doesn't] give a flying fuck"? Your behavior has shocked me into understanding the true degree of hegemonic arrogance which apparently pervades Wikipedia's administrators.
Kudpung - I eagerly await to hear your justification for vilifying a victim of profane verbal attacks launched by an established editor, nepotistically ignoring a flagrant and obvious verbal abuser, and attacking a newcomer to Wikipedia who is now certain never to contribute. 73.219.217.243 ( talk) 13:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Kudpung - I did see the thoughtless invective you launched against me on my page, and I left you with a request to explain your perplexing behaviour: falsely accusing an innocent recipient of having given "abusive diatribes" when in fact all of my language has been respectful and I have been called an "elitist prick" by your troll editor-friend "John from Idegon". I eagerly await to hear your justification for such insanity - attacking the passive and innocent victim of such profane verbal attacks, of which your warning shockingly suggests I am a perpetrator rather than a victim. In doing so I hope you will start to use factual quotes as I have, instead of continued false accusations to appease your friend, flying in the face of all reason and civility. Thanks. 73.219.217.243 ( talk) 02:32, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
I am sorry Sir. Thanks by the way! Marc ( talk) 15:40, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Kudpung, thank you for reviewing Corner Canyon High School (Draper), and thank you for the link to WP:WPSCH/AG - I appreciate the assistance!-- Thelema12 ( talk) 19:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Hey thanks for the Twinkle, it was really thoughtful, appropriate and useful! I read it extremely carefully, including the links therein. I'm really ever so sorry if I broke the !rules (how exactly?), but you know what, when someone keeps disparaging you by asserting falsities without providing one single diff as supporting shred of evidence, despite your insistent requests, well maybe at that point you would lose your good faith too towards that editor. Wouldn't you? All the best. 87.112.180.82 ( talk) 21:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Kudpung. I noticed you just removed a Category page (People from Xichang) from my page Feng Yuanwei. I had just transposed the category from Chinese wikipedia. That category was translated for the new article. Zee money ( talk) 12:50, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
New socks NickiMinaj4life and 86.133.178.209 are obviously abusing accounts of Mrwallace05. 183.171.176.73 ( talk) 08:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung, I loaded up another article in my "Great Escapers" series Harold Milford and while tidying it up within 2 or 3 minutes of initial upload (within the last 10 minutes) some Vandal has been in and wiped it out. Please can you recover anything from my first upload ? Thanks for any help. Incidentally I seem to have been nominated for an award which is very nice. R44 Researcher1944 ( talk) 12:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you again for your help, I shall go and check it out, R44 Researcher1944 ( talk) 09:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Is it me or am I seeing things? There is a face of a little boy inside the back leg of the dog. It looks spooky like a ghost. Please let me know if that is what I am seeing. And did you know it was there .Thank you.- gjblair58@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.18.10.144 ( talk) 07:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I can see you raised the issue of WP:CANVASS here with Cunard but this appears to be continuing. Firstly, DGG rightly declined to comment from this request after intervening. Secondly, I am sure this was done good faith by SwisterTwister here and here but as the AfDs have been listed on the relevant projects I am of the opinion that it should be left for editors to find out about the AfD themselves without any notification. Tanbircdq ( talk) 19:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
( edit conflict):It looks as if I as wrong to have raised it. According to DGG it appears to be a legitimate form of notification and DGG has far more experience in such matters than I. It depends who is pinged. Canvassing to support an opinion is not allowed, but getting more expert eyes on a situation from established editors to ensure that policy is upheld and that an AfD is closed accordingly makes sense to me. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 19:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
MurderByDeadcopy kind of reminds me of User:750editsstrong and other accounts used by that person. That users posted this manifesto at five or six pages, eventually getting blocked for disruptive editing under suspicion of being a banned editor. 750edits had an obsession with Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at Criteria for speedy deletion and murder's post at User talk:Pam120, a one-time editor (and now I wonder if a sockpuppet) complaining about mistreatment from established editors, is real suspicious. If you look at murder's talk page, their barnstar is from a 10-edits account that also seems focused on inclusionism, suggesting that there are more accounts like this out there. What do you think? Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 13:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
This guy ain't been alive for 30 years or so now..... Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:56, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the advise, I tried to implement it. Now working on a new page, Frédéric Bonnaud... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brc ( talk • contribs) 17:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The Notable alumni section is a massive train wreck. Many many entries without either a WP article or any references to backup notability. I'm running names in this section through WP to see if them have an article but so far zilch and therefore I did this edit [1]. Notable alumni sections are like notable people sections in articles about places, the entry must either have a article or a reference from a reliable source. I am probably going to be deleting most names in this section. Just letting you know. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
As a non-administrator I am pretty sure that I am not allowed to add the template. Anyways, you blocked User talk:221.126.237.2 and didn't go a {{block}} template. Is it not there on purpose or am I missing something? Dat GuyWiki ( talk) 13:12, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello Kudpung! Is there any rule against an editor requesting to view their own deleted edits from Special:DeletedContributions from an Admin? There doesn't seem to be, based on what I'm seeing at Wikipedia:Viewing and restoring deleted pages#Viewing a user's deleted edits. I figured I'd ask you, based on your previous participation at Wikipedia:Editor review/deletion edits review. I'd like to try and recreate my CSD log, but Hammersoft at WT:RfA brings up a good point that it'll be impossible for me to do that unless I can review my deleted edits... Anyway, thanks in advance. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 19:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Evidently you were not aware of the previous report against WWGB for edit warring over the actual 1RR warning template on the same article. [2] or you would never have said WWGB was not aware of the 1RR. Now that you are aware, please use your mop to execute the block. Thanks. Legacypac ( talk) 19:13, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung. If you have time, would you mind looking over this draft RfC for clerking? Esquivalience started it, and it was put on hold until the Phase II RfC is closed. I made some changes to it just now, including some cleanup and the addition of a proposal or two. I know you're very interested in clerking and did extensive work on the topic in 2011, so I'm sure you could provide some valuable feedback. Thanks. Biblio worm 00:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't help but notice a comment you left here. What were you referring to when you wrote "plebeian drama boards"? Urban Dictionary defines a "plebeian" as "of low social standing, riff-raff, loser", so I'm not sure what boards you were referring to? Thank you in advance for your reply. Magnolia677 ( talk) 00:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting The Open Championship. The reason I asked at ANI – and I suppose I should've mentioned it – is that I wasn't sure whether to ask for semiprotection or a block for the anon. pʰeːnuːmuː → pʰiːnyːmyː → ɸinimi → fiɲimi 15:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Please reconsider your semi-protection of the London District Christian Secondary School page. In the past two years, there have been only a few cases of vandalism, all from the same IP which can easily be blocked instead. Semi protection for a whole year is overkill and not in line with policy and the open nature of the project. Thank you. 77.99.229.140 ( talk) 19:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 23:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Given your inappropriate comments to me above, and your inappropriate post to User:WWGB to which I objected, I'm VERY surprised to see you close this RfD Ashley_Golebiewski_(3rd_nomination) I started. I'd ask you revert the close as you are an involved editor and let someone involved close it. Legacypac ( talk) 06:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Kudpung. Thank you for your support at my RfA. I don't recall ever being happier at being described as adequate ;) But more seriously, you make an important contribution to ORCP. At my poll, even before your longer comment, it was encouraging to have positive feedback from an admin deeply involved in RfA and moreover with probably the strictest written criteria! Thanks again and happy holidays to you. BethNaught ( talk) 20:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello Kudpung: Enjoy the holiday season and upcoming winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America 1000 22:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Hope the holiday season treats you well my esteemed coulege. (I actually prefer my coulege chowed, not esteemed)
Hope you don't get heat stroke. I'll toss a snowball at my son in your name. John from Idegon ( talk) 07:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings | |
Christmas!
Christmas, everywhere, Have a great Holiday Season. Buster Seven Talk 18:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
|
You say: "take it to the appropriate noticeboard". Which is the appropriate noticeboard? Biscuittin ( talk) 21:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Merry Christmas, Kudpung, and may your holidays be merry and bright . . . . Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 21:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Ϣere
SpielChequers is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15c}} to your friends' talk pages.
Season's Greetings | ||
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Shepherds (Poussin) is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod ( talk) 10:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC) |
May you have very Happy Holidays, Kudpung...
and a New Year filled with peace and happiness.
Best wishes,
Voceditenore (
talk)
18:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (
talk)
00:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The 78.26 RFA Appreciation award | |
Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Of course, we both know you did much more for me than what appears at the RfA proper, but often the best work gets no credit. Again, I thank you. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |
That was a much quicker close that I expected.
"I am very cautious when it comes to avoiding any outing, but if editors feel otherwise, please provide diffs or the like so I can improve."
Do you have any diffs or the like? -- Ronz ( talk) 16:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia!
|
Hello Kudpung: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Tito Dutta ( talk) 18:13, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Well done! Any reason for the variant order of forenames in lead - is it a typo or something from one of the sources? I've made a redirect from the two-name version C.. B... Pam D 09:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Re: [3], I'd like suggestions on what I can do now. Thanks! -- Ronz ( talk) 17:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unneccessary
blisters. |
Kudpung,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Poepkop (
talk)
17:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
.
Kudpung,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. —
k6ka 🍁 (
Talk ·
Contributions)
00:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)