DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This archive page covers approximately the dates between August 26th and September 11.
KnowledgeOfSelf for your Support! |
PS: YES YOU'RE RIGHT HARRY POTTER USES A BROOM! (BUT GOOD MOPS ARE HARD TO FIND!!)
Mr. Self, well what can I say, well what can I say that we havent already babbled about on IRC! :) Thank you so so much, your support, especially, was appreciated. Look forward to working with you ;) - GIen 05:48, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, KOS! Been working some much smaller wikis as of late; this is just getting crazy with vandals. I'm adminning a few smaller projects like this one. Drop me an e-mail when you have a moment. Been doing a bit of anonymous RC patrolling...man, there are some real freaks and weirdos out there. Anyway, take care. You'll know who this is when you click the link. 74.62.6.84 01:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Good to see you back ;) pschemp | talk 08:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Aww, thanks. :) Luna Santin 20:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
The Resilient Barnstar | ||
Looking thru the history of your user page reveals some real struggles. I know I'm at least six months late, but better late than never. :D — $PЯING εrαgђ |
Apparently, UJonk has been creating User:--- pages (see his contributions) and all I see on them is that they have been indefinitely blocked.
I'm just wondering if these are real users, and why it says UJonk has created all of them.
Can you please clear this issue up? I'm a bit confused here.
-- Nishkid64 23:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
You should know that lancs a lot is an agenda based editor. See County Watch.-- 84.9.195.55 20:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I deliberately blanked the warnings at User talk:218.214.70.16. They were all old and no longer relevant. I believe leaving old warnings dilutes the message and makes it harder for the anon to find the latest message. I would not delete warnings given in the last few days but warnings back to November 2005 just make it harder to dind the latest - the Nov 2005 may not refer tot he same computer user. I discussed this at Wikipedia talk:Removing warnings poll#Clean-up of IP talk pages and got the response Antique IP talk pages are speedy deletion candidates. Whenever I run into one with only old warnings when I'm about to warn someone, I delete it before adding a new warning. I understand that not everyone who does RC patrol has admin powers, but I don't see the problem with anyone blanking the page before adding new warnings (or even without adding new warnings). JYolkowski Regsards-- Arktos talk 02:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I see that you block my username of the folowing reason:
Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "W1N570N5M17H".
It is also written there that my ip is 72.14.192.33
It must be a mistake. First of all I DO NOT USE this IP(and never used it before) My IP is 88.215.149.10(for the last 5 mounth). Secondly - you can check the contributions assumed to my username and ip and see that there are no spam or any actions kinda of that. Thank you Sasha l 12:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
You are enlisted | ||
I hear by place this award for your thankless vandal fighting and place you as a honorary member of the wikipedia vandal-fightng army. Betacommand |
Why do you think usernames with the term "your mother" (or similar) will be blocked on sight? Thanks. Big top 19:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page again! Molerat 20:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Yo KOS, block me for 10 days. Or I'll go on a vandalism spree. -- Dangherous 19:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
I, Glen give you KnowledgeOfSelf this delicious traditional Kiwi Pavlova for the WORST jokes in thew world!!! - GIen 04:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC) |
Appreciate it; it's our only form of payment around here. Best, Antandrus (talk) 20:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry for that, I arranged the artice now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.140.183.135 ( talk • contribs)
I'm not vadalzing the FPC talk page. I created an archive!!!!!!!!!!! 66.36.148.132 04:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Don't worry about the deletion... I've significantly updated and expanded the article on Gemstone IV. 71.202.122.184 04:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Jordan Bowen
Thanks for the revert of my userpage. Much appreciated, Gwernol 12:20, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your assistance with the edits made by 65.182.28.194 on the Rainforest Alliance page... the IP address is registered in San Jose, Costa Rica (one of the three major Rainforest Alliance headquarters) - so these edits are a bit suspicious to me. I am still relatively new to Wikipedia - what is the procedure when dealing with such vandalism? We can't revert these edits forever... Thanks again for your help! Quebecois1983 18:24, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent
RfA, which was successful with a an overwhelmingly flattering and deeply humbling total of 138/2/2 (putting me #10 on the RfA
WP:100). I guess
infinite monkey theorem has been officially proven. Chimps really can get somewhere on Wikipedia.
With new buttons come great responsibility, and I'll try my best to live up to your expectations. If you need assistance with something, don't hesitate to swing by my talk page or email me (trust me, I do respond :)). The same goes for any complaints or comments in regard to my administrative actions. Remember, I'm here for you. (Thanks go to Blnguyen for the incredible photo to the right.) alphaChimp laudare 01:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC) |
Could you delete these templates below created by me? Thanks. Big top 01:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
List of my pages to be deleted by an admin:
User:Bigtop/Template:Notice User:Bigtop/Template:Notice/UsernameBlocked User:Bigtop/Template:Notice/UsernameBlocked/Company User:Bigtop/Template:Notice/UsernameBlocked/Non-latin User:Bigtop/Template:Notice/UsernameBlocked/Email User:Bigtop/Template:Notice/UsernameBlocked/Wikimedia
Too many nice folks here. Those other wikis are kinda lonely. Thanks for the warm welcome, SL. -- Lucky 6.9 16:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed that there are ip user who created new signature. I mean I'm so curious about these two IP. User:68.39.174.238 and User:69.145.123.171. Are these IP user really IP? In my opinion, They're good ip users or These two IP are not controlled by Human. Is it true that those IP I've mentioned really IP user? Please, reply in my talk page. Cheers! Daniel's page ☎ 02:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the message, KOS! Unfortunately, my professional life has become increasingly busy and I am not certain that I will be able to resume editing Wikipedia. I have enjoyed working with you and the other editors. — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Gots us a million chortles here, SL. Hey, this is where we, the intelligentsia of the internet gather because myspace is just too darn boring! Besides, my leet speak is rusty. :)) - Lucky 6.9 05:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
About Tat language in Medinat Israel please read: [1] and also speak to your president: Mushe(Masha'allah) Katsav.
zandweb 18:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Oooh, thanks. I haven't had one of those in a looong time. >Radiant< 21:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my talk page. Someone from AOL keeps making this same post on user or talk pages, and I'm going to block them for 15, as you did when I see it happen again. Thanks again, DVD+ R/W 03:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I did not vandalize my own talk page I wanted to add deletion in my talk page but I did a mistake, I wrote a deletion instead of delete, anyway, I did candidate my talk page for deletion speedy, and feel free to not leave a spam on my talk page after deletion. Thanks for understanding. Evidental 03:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. noted and got it, I do the archives. but if I did a typo in first try don't consider it as a vandalism. I wrote deletion instead of delete and you consider this as vandalism? sorry how to this I should add db-owner within double { and } ? I am affraid to do a typo and again it would be considered as vandalism! :-( Evidental 03:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I did archives, thanks for guide. and sorry I did not know how to sign! and could you tell me how to change my username? should I contact admin for this? Evidental 03:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi KnowledgeofSelf,
Sorry about the confusion with the Fairly Oddparents article. I will use the "edit summary" feature in the future.
Thanks for your help!
-- Jeffaplus 20:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks so much for that shiny barnstar, and a huge congrats on passing your 10,000 edit milestone! :D You deserve one of these as well for all the times you pressed the block button first. Cheers, Sango 123 23:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on your 10 000 edits!! Now as Joanne says - 'get some treatment for that editcountitis and have fun making the next 10k' -- Alf melmac 12:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Gee! I have seem this Wikipedia system at work and it's great!! Thanks so much for your "interception". Information will set us free! I can now believe it!! I have been to the Mountain and I have seen the face of G.. NO! just kidding...LOL
I am now a "bigger booster" of Wikipedia...Everyone in my circle (seniors) told me this Encyclopedia would never work!! I now have some evidence that it does and on the "honour" or "anarchically"...LOL I wonder if we can now push for "voting on line and on issues in a "DIRECT DEMOCRACY"??? HMMMM! The revolution has begun....Information is now in the hands of the "masses"...Rise up, Rise up....LOL...
4d-don
Do you have to be an administrator to put {{ Blatantvandal-n}} on talk pages? I decided to be bold and do it here, but I was wondering if I should/shouldn't have done it. (Can you reply on my talk page as well as here?) — $ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (- ¢| ε| Ŀ| T| ♫-) 03:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)