DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This archive page covers approximately the dates between July 29 and August 26th.
Hi. Are you the person to talk to about the Kosmix entry? I have a non-kosmix.com entry that can't be added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onslo88 ( talk • contribs)
Why on Earth am I always the last one to find out about stuff? :P Either way, it's good to see you back again. Tito xd( ?!?) 06:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Wow - approving you was a no brainer (you skipped the dozen other people :) Welcome note follows: Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, KnowledgeOfSelf! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. - Glen 11:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Wow, you're back? Rock on. =) -- Fang Aili talk 15:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
of my Klan paragraphs on the Stamford page. I'm shocked that anyone would take them out, but I can imagine why. Anyway, much appreciated. Noroton 21:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Wow, that was fast. You sure you're not a bot? ;) -- Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 22:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I just revert 89.55.32.13 's version to older version( http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Partij_voor_Naastenliefde%2C_Vrijheid_en_Diversiteit&oldid=67024976) ... this random user has no right to call for deletion of a topic...and you reverted it back to his "vandalised" version... can you give me a reason for that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.6.56 ( talk • contribs)
Tis silent... -- Bane s 17:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Why'd you depart? Sorry I was unable to answer...come back. :P -- Bane s 09:48, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
You said that I replaced the Winnipeg, Manitoba article with a blank page. I have no idea what you are referring to as I just edited a section of that article as a new sub article has been created due to the article becoming to lengthy. Would you mind explaining? Thanks. -- 207.161.43.149 20:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
21:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
If you look you will see that the old content has been placed into the Winnipeg Geography and Climate article, and both articles have been substantially improved. I did not remove content per se, just moved it. The Winnipeg article is now too lengthy. Please do not revert the material again. Thanks. -- 207.161.43.149 21:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
It is best to conduct a careful investigation before reverting any material. There is now a new article entitled Winnipeg Geography and Climate which contains all of the previous information plus much more. You have no idea how much additional effort I have had to expend. And now someone else is reverting the article back because they are not bothering to check!-- 207.161.43.149 21:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Dear Steve, I have no words to tell you how much the beautiful gift you've given me has moved me. I really can't, no matter how much I try. I look back and remember all we went through, from the first message you sent me when I was a clueless newcomer (the Mariposa War, remember? :) and your wonderful advices... and my first award ever, which I proudly display! :) and our talk when I got nominated for the UPA, hah :) and how sad I went when after my wikibreak I saw you had departed, and what we talked by email... it is great when life shows us it has a funny way of helping us out when we think everything's gone wrong :) You are in many senses, like my older wiki-brother, and know that when I found out you were back, my heart began to beat like crazy. Bright people and beautiful spirits like yours are hard to find in this sometimes too hard world, Steve. No matter what people may tell you, don't ever let them bring you down again. I, for once, promise you you'll always have a shoulder to lean on and a hand to help you, and two sympathetic ears to hear you any time you need. I wish I could hug you for real. Take good care, my dear Stevie - I promise we'll talk much, much more in the days to come :) Hugs, Sharon ♥ The Wiki Soundtrack!♪ - 14:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey Owen, been a long time! I've added an other edit of the day, I think you'll like this newest one! KOS | talk 18:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey KoS,
The Wikipedia has missed you. WB! Computerjoe 's talk 18:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
I've changed your monobook to mean the rollback script is now 'included' from another page, so it doesn't need updating every time something is fixed. Everything should still work, if it doesn't, get back to me. — FireFox ( talk) 10:38, 03 August '06
For having just passed another milestone, I think you deserve to relax for a bit, with this Nicaraguan cigar! -- Alf melmac 13:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
I really like it. It reads well — it has a nice flow. It's fully sourced and comprehensive, and I can tell that you have put a lot of hard work into it. Very Good job, and I'm not just saying that. I'll offer any help that I can. I'm still gonna wait for that joke :D Orane ( talk • cont.) 02:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
This article is weird and has a cabal of socks editing back in refs to registers there is no written proof of her actually having. Your rv was rv'd by another btw-- I'll bring the food 15:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Indeed, however I'm headed out in about half an hour, and am on skype at the moment, so... :P -- Bane s 12:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I am a long-standing (though quiet) sysop, mostly creating new content and copyediting. This new user, personally known to me in meatspace tried to create a username and make some contributions. He phoned me to ask why he could not make edits, so I (foolishly) logged in as him with his permission and got "tagged" (blocked). So I unblocked him and scolded him by phone. Until I have a chance to sit down with him and show him the ropes, he will not make any edits. Thanks. Caltrop 13:11, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
That seems a bit rude. It looks as though you don't like user 100110100 and I am inclined to agree that renaming articles in the way that this user has is not the right way to do things however reverting edits by that user on my talk page seems a gross overreaction. Lumberjack Steve 13:16, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Just a question, why did you add "LONG" to the nomination... as you said in your edit summary, it's only 24.4 kB. Isn't 32 the cutoff for "LONG" status? -- light darkness ( talk) 14:32, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I'm currently in a major overhaul of my userpage and have been autoblocked. The user that is responsible for the original block is not online. I have asked others to for help, but I am asking multiple people incase on does not see my post quickly. Could you please unblock me so I don't loose my works. The IP is 205.188.116.5. Thanks- JCarriker 05:44, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
You've beaten me to quite a few reverts, recently. :) Even when I go through to revert the leftovers from whatever half-dozen guys you've just blocked, you're already there. You've been a valuable asset to the wiki and to the CVU -- a lean, mean, vandal-fightin' machine! Luna Santin 09:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC) |
Why dont you just mind your own business? Go away and leve me alone. -- Joshuarooney2006 18:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey there, KnowledgeOfSelf, I hope you are enjoying your time back on Wikipedia. It's rather fantastic that you are contributing once again. I know/believe you're no longer currently a member of Esperanza (whether it be by choice or not), but I have an Esperanza related question/request for you. By the way, you should consider rejoining, it would be lovely to have you back. :) Anyway, the topic of Esperanza collaborating with the Kindness Campaign has been brought up again, and since you came up with the original idea for this, I thought it might be helpful if you could explain a bit more what you had in mind, or flesh out some details. If you don't want to, I understand, but your knowledge (no pun intended!) would certainly be welcome. It's only been brought up briefly (see Wikipedia_talk:Esperanza#Kindness_Campaign), but any thoughts you have would be great, there or on the proposals page. Many thanks, and I do hope to see you back at Esperanza, -- Nataly a 02:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
The content I removed was a copyright violation. That is all. 69.165.40.102 03:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
AOL, naturally causing its own share of collateral damage-- 205.188.117.12 03:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
/me is bored. :P -- Bane s 16:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Good evening. I wanted to let you know that I've just restored two pages that you'd speedy-deleted. I do not believe that they met the deliberately narrow criteria necessary for speedy-deletion. 2002 GayVN Awards was merged into another page. Because the contents were moved, we have an obligation to preserve the contribution history. It's a requirement of GFDL. While it is technically possible to preserve attribution history without preserving the original page, the techniques are time-consuming and error-prone. And they don't appear to have been carried out in this case. 4th GayVN Awards also had history, though only as the destination page before a pagemove. In that case, the reason to keep the page as a redirect instead of deleting it is to direct the original author(s) and readers to the destination page so they can join in making the correct page as good as it can be.
By the way, if these were discussed and decided in an RFD discussion, my apologies. I checked but found no evidence that they'd been discussed. Rossami (talk) 05:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
This is mostly an FYI. The anon you blocked this morning was not just some random vandal. It was the Tots TV vandal. This vandal is a long-term (over 6 months now) subtle misinformation vandal. He is on a dynamic IP, so his IP shifts every few days. He can be easily identified, because he makes the same edits to certain pages every time. The boy/girl change to the Tots TV page is his signature change. Warning this vandal is useless. (Not a criticism, as you had no way of knowing.) Protecting or semi-protecting his targets is also mostly useless, as he'll just move on to other targets, and return to his favorites when they are eventually un-protected. I generally revert every edit he makes and block his current IP for a week, which is effectively a block until he next shifts on his dynamic IP. Given that he's a subtle misinformation vandal, I consider even the edits that are not obviously vandalism to be suspect. If you want to help watch for him in general, mark a few of the pages he targets for watching, and you'll soon see the patterns to his edits. Anyway, this was mostly an FYI to let you know who it was that you were dealing with today. - TexasAndroid 13:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking that Joshua guy for his attacks on me. It was really kind of getting repetitive.
But did you really intend to block for 1000 hours? Don't blocks normally "escalate" in a set fashion?
Eh, whatever: You are the admin, you do what you want. Logical2u 14:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
I'd just like to note that I have been anonymously using wiki for a few years now, and have made several useful edits. I suppose I was just feeling mischievious when I edited the article on Mr. O'Reilly. That you were able to revert the change and chastise my ass for it in a span of about a minute is impressive. Wikipedia is more efficient than I thought.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.170.20.244 ( talk • contribs)
I think if you are truly to know yourself you will appreciate the value of Meese in society. ~ LD
I donot remove content! I tried to create an archive, which I did for the previous FAC nomination , in order to renominate the article. I donot know what I did wrong, but instead of accusing me of vandalism, please give me some suggestions to do it right!-- Yannismarou 11:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Wow, you and BseballBaby were fast, thanks for that. I wonder what I did to garner that friendly message. BigNate37 (T) 20:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I saw you reverted on Dublin, but Polocook also said the climate wasn't necessary at the bottom of Talk:Dublin. Should I revert the talk page? — $ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (- ¢| ε| Ŀ| T| ♪-) 00:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! I added it to my list. :) Owen× ☎ 17:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
I won't to the copy+paste like I did on [the rest of] my friends' talk pages (see User talk:Phaedriel for an example), but check out my re-designed user page, done today! — $ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (- ¢| ε| Ŀ| T| ♪-) 03:33, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Seems you overlooked Willys on das wheels ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), part of the Willy creation spree of the last half hour. Thanks for spotting the others. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
For blocking vandals, and doing it well, and managing to block a load of Willy sockpuppets. Keep the good work up! TheM62Manchester 20:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC) |
Could you please create my user page? Just a . or - something to allow me to expand it myself?-- 172.130.227.58 16:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
The 64 range is currently range blocked, you don't really need to give each one a 15 minute block, since they're already blocked-- 152.163.100.66 21:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Sorry but we're supposed be a team and I'm just real frustrated that we're not. -- Alf melmac 23:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
It is not me who is removing content. I am adding content and arguing for the inclusion of the Chicago Surrealist Group in the Post Breton Surrealism section as a group in the post-surrealist situationist current. Other editers are pushing POV in removing the link. The reference is fully sourced and verified and the article for CSG and other links will confirm that. 62.25.106.209 14:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
...for the birthday wish. My day went great. My friends took me out to dinner. A couple of the girls baked me a cake (with a lot of alcohol inside) and I spent the night camping in one of my friend's backyard, and we all got wasted and smoked pot. It was freaking awesome. (Kids if you're reading this, don't smoke.) Orane ( talk • cont.) 17:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
I've been trying to comtact you about the Kosmix entry, which it appears you had something to do with deleting. I have a legitimate entry for 'Kosmix'. "The Kosmix" is a comic strip that has nothing to do with the search engine. Check out the site: www.kosmixbook.com . I'm new to posting on Wikipedia. Please help out if you can. Thanks
I just edited the Benny Hinn Wikipedia page to remove libellous and scandalous material. Wikipedia rules state that such material must be removed. Are you above the Wikipedia rules?
You cannot rely on libellous material e.g. http://www.trinityfi.org/press/heretic.html to form the information in Wikipedia. Note he does not explain where he has got that information from. Somebody needs to get sued offer such misinformation.
How do you propose to edit the Article to include only non-libellous material. Who should we sue? Wikipedia or the authors of the articles?
Thanks for reverting the page delete some one placed on that page. Was it pure vandalism or something else? Dodge 20:33, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Could you please protect this so this sockpuppet will stop trolling there.. Thanks! — Moe Epsilon 00:23 August 25 '06
This is the 51st heading! Btter archive! :P — $ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (- ¢| ε| Ŀ| T| ♪-) 01:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)