Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to
Mud bath appears to be a
minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given
undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a
neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's
talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Adakiko (
talk)
15:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)reply
I cited my sources on its effectiveness in treating arthritis with proper medical journals. I removed the information that presented this article as an advertisement. Please calrify exactly what was a minority or fringe viewpoint as everything I corrected was sufficiently sourced. If need be, I will provide more sources.
Kleptotoid (
talk)
15:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)reply
It makes claims about It works by allowing the skin to absorb nutrients in the mud but it is not a medical source. See
wp:MEDRS. That's not acceptable on Wikipedia.
Adakiko (
talk)
15:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Hey I just wanted to leave you a message and let you know that per
WP:BRD you should go to the
article's talk page and explain why the changes should be introduced in the article and to get
a consensus for your edits before trying to reinsert them into the article. Continuing to reinsert the changes repeatedly once you know there is a disagreement is
edit warring and could result in being blocked from editing. Please also note that while edit warring in general can lead to a block, there is a bright-line rule known as
WP:3RR: you cannot make more than 3 reverts within a 24 hour period (not that you can go up to 3 and still avoid a block but this is a bright-line rule that shows concentrated and immediately actionable edit warring). Thanks. -
Aoidh (
talk)
18:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)reply