This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Thank you for your message regarding copyright of Oxford DNB on 22nd August, I appreciate you flagging this problem to me. It was definitely not my intention to violate copyright. I believed that as long as the information was not reprinted verbatim and that the source was referenced that this would be ok. This is obviously not the case. I will have a look over Wikipedia's copyright policies again to try and insure that this doesn't happen again. NBeauman —Preceding unsigned comment added by NBeauman ( talk • contribs) 11:57, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey, Thanks for bringing to my attention the change that had been made. I am certain it is a rambutan and I have added it to the respective articles. -- Muhammad (talk) 14:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Kateshort4bobsock ( talk · contribs)? ↪ REDVERS The internet is for porn 09:02, 11 September 2009 (UTC)