This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I added an internal link to Blackadder on the off chance that someone will discover the series if they read the article. Dusen189 ( talk) 21:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Firstly, let me wish you a very happy New Year and thank you for all your help in the Milhist Tag & Assess 2007 drive.
Military history service award | ||
For tagging and assessing 1000 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, by order of the coordinators I hereby present you with this Military history WikiProject Service Award. -- ROGER DAVIES talk 09:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
For your fine work on 2000 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, by order of the coordinators I hereby present you with this Tireless Contributor's barnstar. -- ROGER DAVIES talk 09:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
Secondly, although the Tag & Assess 2007 drive is now officially closed, you are very welcome to continue tagging and assessing until 31 January 2008. Any articles you tag and assess during this time will be credited fully to your tagging tally for further award purposes.
Thirdly, it would be good to have your feedback/comments on drive at the Tag & Assess workshop
Thanks again for your help, -- ROGER DAVIES talk 09:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your wonderful edit Kate. I will get the references noted. I noticed there was a speedy deletion tag set, when I went to address the situation to challenge, I could not find the tag in the code. Was it removed due to your contribution on the work? If so, thank you so very much. You are a terrific help to a new content provider and a fantastic editor.
Please let me know if I need to take any action regarding the "speedy" delete note I found that was posted prior to your contribution.
You are wonderful, write back...
LDCortez talk page —Preceding comment was added at 01:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Kateshortforbob, I've granted rollback rights to your account. The reason for this is that, after a review of some of your contributions, I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended use of reverting vandalism: I do not believe you will abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. Acalamari 19:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
My request for adminship was successful at 64/1/2! Many thanks for your participation and I will endeavor to meet your expectations. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 09:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm afraid I present the wrong tone with the FAQ. My intention there was it is a good summary of the information sourced elsewhere. I have added the other sources in my talk page. They were made available to the MTBF pages as well. The issue I have is: Given the information is sourced, how can I still be violating those guidelines? Do I have a fundamental mis-understanding of those guidelines? NYCDA ( talk) 21:40, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
I hereby award this barnstar to Kateshortforbob for his kind help on my userpage formatting. Perfect Proposal Speak Out! 16:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC) |
Anyways, I do like your version of my userpage, but it seems a bit "messy". Is there any way to arrange the userboxes so there's no overlap?
Thanks again,