Hello. Regarding your questions about NASA spinoffs -- actually, the creators of the NASA Spinoff journal are given very strict guidelines as to what is considered a spinoff. (There are 7 criteria, which I can list in the Wiki article if you think it's warranted.) Tang isn't a spinoff. Sinking money into a technology doesn't make it a spinoff; it has to fit the criteria. This particular Wiki article is both about NASA spinoffs and the NASA Spinoff journal, because they're completely intertwined and part of the Innovative Partnerships Program office. When the public has a question about NASA spinoffs, they are directed to the NASA Spinoff publication office. I'm sure that someone could create a DoD spinoffs page. I don't know the number of DoD spinoffs, but at last count there were over 1600 NASA spinoffs. Other possible sources, other than NASA, would be the companies themselves (biased, too) or secondary sources, such as Popular Science, peer-reviewed journals, or patent applications, I suppose.
-- 198.116.13.100 ( talk) 13:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Karl. I guess the Wikipedia being in the news has interested you in editing Wikipedia a bit more. Ran into some of your comments on Jimbo Wales. -- C S (Talk) 10:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Indeed. I believe a slashdot article on woot was the tipping point. I have found Wikipedia to be relatively useful for an internet source. -- KarlHallowell 14:01, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
209.244.42.15 20:46, 27 January 2007 (UTC)== Purge "greater or lesser" ==
"Greater or lesser" connotes change, so, "variously,"
or "variably" might have been a better word choice.
Hi Karl. I made added a section entitled "corruption" to House of Saud's page. I need your help with editing the section. PeaceLL 04:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
So I do agree with you in some extent.
Andy831 03:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi KarlHallowell. Thank you for contacting me. As you requested, see my response at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Time#era categories..... I will be happy to discuss any issues you may have in detail. Thank you so much, IZAK 08:18, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi recently I've been trying to get people together who are interested in expanding Kardashev scale. I read on the Talk:Kardashev scale page where you mentioned that if we could have harnessed the energy from the Tsar bomb Human civilization could have jumped up into the Type I range (1.8) and possibly Type II if you combined the 5.4×1024W of energy with the energy we already produce. But as far as sources I can't find where the explosion last for 40ns and everything I would need to add it to the article. What do you think?-- Sparkygravity ( talk) 13:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, KarlHallowell. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, KarlHallowell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)