This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, Jzsj. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " John Stochl".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 12:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Please bear in mind that there are layout guides to help editors allow the the reader to understand an article better. Not only that but templates are made to highlight a theme in an article and link it to others. These templates have symbols and links to articles on the history of the Jesuits. The Society of Jesus is mentioned in the opening paragraph, the infobox, and the category. If you would like further mentions of the Society, please make a template to help the reader find more articles on the Jesuits, and not make it look as if you are advertising or sticking a badge in a corner of your articles. Just putting an uncaptioned symbol at the top of the article, at worst, an editor without positively constructing your actions, may see it as Wikipedia:Ownership. Also, Wikipedia allows logos of organizations to be uploaded, but they can only be used in the organization's own article. Please use the Upload File Wizard to do so. If you need a help with any of these things, please feel free to ask, I'll be more than happy to help. Pjposullivan ( talk) 03:18, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
I find the discussion inconclusive on the couple places it has taken place. I see no problem with using the logo within the infobox for organizations that use it anywhere on the website, including for their publications. The warning about branding is not meant to deny any organization its logo within the info box. As I mentioned before, placing it outside the box was in agreement with an editor who acknowledged that there was a good argument for this, as it occupied less space there. But in the future I will place it inside the box of those organizations that have no other logo in Wikipedia Commons. Jzsj ( talk) 12:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Detroit Mercy Law Clinics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
HappyValleyEditor (
talk)
23:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello: just a basic question: why should anyone in the world care if such and such program is a required part of coursework for a degree program? The lede needs to be rewritten to be appealing to a more general audience. The entire article should be deleted unless you can come up with some sources that show it is notable to the geenral world. I'm leaving you a note to let you know this, as maybe, just mayb there is a notable article in there somewhere. You'll have to find some sources to prove that... and for Pete's sake, please rewrite the lede to be of interest to those outside of the Mercy Law Program. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 01:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Detroit Mercy Law Clinics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Detroit Mercy Law Clinics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 01:13, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Human Life Centre, Bhubaneswar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Life Centre, Bhubaneswar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 01:31, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
I have posted the weird reference in the Jesuit law clinic article to WP:RSN. I am starting to understand that you are making a general statement about Jesuits being fans of education and other good things. That's all well and good, but the slant/tone and POV of the article is problematic in an almost proselytizing way. I'm not saying that you are proselytizing, but I am getting a weird religious vibe from the intro that tells me the POV Is not netural. I do not think it's appropriate to support the opening of the article with a statement about the nobel goals of the religion. It's like saying "business poeple have always been interested in the noble pursuit making money" in the lede of an article on Warren Buffet. Does that make sense to you? The ref provided is so general, and so unrelated to the article subject, that is is coming off as religious promotion, at least in my eyes. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 01:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Jzsj. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Deb ( talk) 11:57, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Jesuit Foundation – Prison Ministry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Gab4gab (
talk)
23:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dorothy Day Center for Faith and Justice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorothy Day Center for Faith and Justice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 17:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Center for Faith and Public Life is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Faith and Public Life until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 17:14, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 02:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute of Global Concern is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Global Concern until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 02:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Jzsj. Since you are creating numerous articles, I would like to encourage you to use the citation templates (available in the editor) and to provide complete citations. This is a service to readers as it makes it easier for them to know what is cited without having to click on every link. As an example, this citation of yours:
Would display like:
and the coded content would be
{{cite journal|last1=Veng|first1=Lao|last2=Kheng|first2=Sisary|title=The Development of Victim Assistance in Cambodies|journal=The Journal of ERW and Mine Action|volume=16|issue=3|url=http://www.jmu.edu/cisr/journal/16.3/sr/kheng.shtml}}
However, you don't have to write all this coding, you just fill in the form that is available in the edit area.
I admit I'm a real fanatic on citations, but they do matter, and will matter even more in the future because there are people working on creating an accessible database of citations from Wikipedia. The unformatted ones will not be usable, but the ones that use the citation formatting will be. I try to encourage editors to use the formatting whenever possible. It will eventually make your citation discoverable and usable by others. Thank you, LaMona ( talk) 14:16, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Rohtas Educational and Associated Programs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Brianhe (
talk)
00:31, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
The article African Jesuit AIDS Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Brianhe (
talk)
00:32, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jesuit Social Service Thailand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Brianhe ( talk) 00:35, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Centro Gumilla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Brianhe ( talk) 00:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rohtas Educational and Associated Programs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Brianhe ( talk) 06:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Centro Gumilla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
HappyValleyEditor (
talk)
19:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesuit Foundation – Prison Ministry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesuit Foundation – Prison Ministry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 19:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ateneo Social Science Research Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ateneo Social Science Research Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 20:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centro Gumilla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centro Gumilla until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 23:00, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Casa Ricci Social Services has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
HappyValleyEditor (
talk)
23:46, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corpus Christi Community is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corpus Christi Community until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 19:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Kripke Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
HappyValleyEditor (
talk)
20:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Center for Community Service and Justice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Community Service and Justice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 22:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Jesuit Migration Academic Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
HappyValleyEditor (
talk)
23:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Service Yezu Mwiza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
HappyValleyEditor (
talk)
23:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesuit Centre for Ecology and Development is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesuit Centre for Ecology and Development until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 23:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cours de Formation Generale pour Adultes Ruraux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cours de Formation Generale pour Adultes Ruraux until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HappyValleyEditor ( talk) 23:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Please see here, [1] [2] and also at the AFD for Centro Gumilla [3]. I have warned an editor about statements he made about you on both pages. Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |