![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 |
Hey there! I'm working on verifying permission for use of the above noted file. To expedite the process, I am requesting restoration of the file. I appreciate your help. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Best regards, Cindy( talk) 10:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:FPlowres has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Armbrust
The Homunculus
21:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
I found a way to automate the FP count, which should make it a bit less prone to wander from true. This does break the current script, though, so I removed the now-unnecessary section. Could you please update from User:Adam_Cuerden/closeFPC.js? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 16:35, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Jujutacular, long time no speak. Hope your OK and still on here. I see that you are an administrator and wonder if I could ask you some advice. The above file is currently proving a real headache at my latest FAC as it will not display the cropped version which I uploaded onto enWiki today. Basically, and to cut a long story short, I uploaded an image to Commons as I thought it would be PD. A rather invaluable reviewer who knows his stuff when it comes to images, has dropped in at the peer review and has advised me to move the image from Commons to EnWiki as the PD claim is questionable, but certainly old enough to consider so. My (our) problem is that no matter how many times we upload it, the cropped version will not stay up and it reverts to the image which was uploaded previously that shows where it was originally taken from. Obviously with an impending FAC, the cropped version would be a whole lot more preferable. Do you have any advice? Also, will the previous several thousand attempts to upload need to be trimmed down by an administrator? Best as always! -- Cassianto Talk 17:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. On the 5th September, you deleted File:Internazionale.svg, because it was an unused non-free file. However, it was only unused because someone wrongly uploaded a free version and used that in the original file's place. When the 'free' file was inevitably deleted for being non-free, the page became logo-less. Could you un-delete File:Internazionale.svg if at all possible? Cheers, Malpass93! ( what I've been up to/ drop me a ___) 19:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Happy Wednesday! It is Wednesday, isn't it? Oy vey and ugh. Well, I'm working on verifying authorization for use of the above noted image. Could you help a chick out and restore the file to help expedite the process? Yes, forever grateful. My solemn vow. Cindy( talk) 21:06, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior ( talk · contribs), Ocaasi ( talk · contribs)
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. -- The Interior 21:38, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Hey there! I'm working on verifying authorization for the file linked above. Hoping you can restore the file in order to expedite the process. I appreciate your help. If you have questions, please feel free to drop me a line. Best regards, Cindy( talk) 17:38, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm afraid your edit summary for restoring the page doesn't help me, could you tell me the exact reason? The way I see it, WP:R#DELETE 8 clearly applies here. All "Fictional+beings+and+reference+failure" 26 Google hits are either spam or derived from Wikipedia, and "Fictional+beings+and+reference+failure" Scholar comes up dry. Regards, Paradoctor ( talk) 00:59, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with the page move. Now I'm taking a look at pages that link to the book and film, and some cleaning up needs to be done. The part I need help with is this link, because it too involves an existing redirect:
I think I can handle the rest, including this one:
Thanks. -- Brangifer ( talk) 07:45, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Can you provide a little help in cutting the last second from "Last Rites-Loved to Death demo sample.ogg" and re-naming "Megadeth - Sweating Bullets sample.ogg" to "Sweating Bullets" since there are no songs or files under that name?-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 00:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Why was Deal with the Devil (2013 Pop Evil song) moved to Deal with the Devil (Pop Evil song) instead of Deal with the Devil (song). Is there another notable song named "Deal with the Devil"? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 15:56, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
JMHamo ( talk) 01:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
This article "Appy Pie Inc" was a brand new article that I created and I understand that my previous article "Appy Pie" was using press releases as sources and using some promotional terms but this was corrected in my latest article "Appy Pie Inc" as all the references that I used are notable sources also, If you refer to the below link http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=Q0FQLzIwMTMvMTIvMDIjQXIwMjUwMg then you will see Worlds largest selling english daily The Times of India covered Abhinav Girdhar's wedding and categorically mentions the fact that he is Founder of Appy Pie Inc, which I think is a very notable source, this along with other sources that I have previously added will make this article as a permanent fixture, Please advise me on next steps to un-delete this article. • Cxs107 ( talk) 17:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
I do not know why I missed this earlier, but I have just come across this AfD concerning Jim Lawrence (ice hockey). I fail to understand how you came to your conclusion that there was a consensus to delete when ivotes were split 4-5 on whether to keep or delete. As required by WP:NSPORTS, the article did provide reliable sources showing that the subject met the sport specific criteria of WP:NHOCKEY, and all four of the “keep” votes argued that the subject did, indeed, meet the sport specific criteria.
Per WP:DELAFD, the deletion of a page based on a deletion discussion should only be done when there is consensus to do so. Therefore, since it can not be reasonably concluded that there was a consensus for deletion, the page should properly be kept. I ask you to review your closing of this AfD, and to restore the article given there was no consensus for deletion. Dolovis ( talk) 22:27, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
In regards to BRD kindly move it back to the original pending a move discussion as that is the proper avenue. Maybe its dissolved but election is called, so no ambiguity in crisis there .( Lihaas ( talk) 10:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)).
There was no debate. The page was marked for deletion. There was zero activity. There was written support. Then a very random deletion at the very end the day it was deleted. Almost as if people were waiting for the person who made the page to forget about it.
That does not seem very sportsmanlike to me.
If the decision was to delete until Brickbat Revue got off line support of it being archived in places of note then some time should have been given or that should have been said initially.
There was an entire month to make those comments and no one made any. It is almost as if they "debate" was fake and the decision was already made. That's fine, but why call it a debate if there didn't really seem to be any chance of it being a winnable debate if the person doesn't have online archival evidence.
I feel the page should be put back online with a set time for proof to be provided of its legitimacy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1635schl ( talk • contribs) 20:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Hello Jujutacular: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Northamerica1000 (talk) 05:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
![]()
|
Hi Jujutacular,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Humble Tower.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 14, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-01-14. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 01:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Dear Administrator Juju
Please advise if I could recover the deleted page as "The Suspect (2013 Film)" now, or any suggestion to have it being created again? The movie was released on December 24, 2013 in Korea and January 10, 2014 in USA. Please. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/10/movies/gong-yoo-stars-in-the-suspect.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=0 c
Thanks for the deletions so far. Any chance you might finish the job? Andy Dingley ( talk) 00:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
John C. Beale at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! (Clarification: I just think it'd be good to have the hook fact be more explicitly cited in the article—no big thing.) —
AJDS
talk
16:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 16 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John C. Beale, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that EPA climate policy expert John C. Beale (pictured) pretended to be a CIA agent for more than ten years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John C. Beale. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bolschewismus ohne Maske.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Amediausa is requesting an unblock for a change of username. Okay if I unblock? All the best, Mini apolis 23:08, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
...before I take THIS live. Thanks, Schmidt, Michael Q. 12:48, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy New Year !!! | |
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS |
Hi there, a long time ago (13 April 2011) you deleted Weston St Johns F.C. after it was PRODded and the PROD expired [1]. Having just noticed it, I am pretty sure this football club is notable. While it never participated in the FA Cup, it did participate within the top ten levels of the English football league system – this criterion is applied by the football WikiProject to determine club notability. I don't know if it's too long ago to restore it, or what kind of state the article was in, but is there any chance of restoring it so I can improve it and establish notability? Cheers, Bretonbanquet ( talk) 16:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)