Hello, Johnbt21, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!
Atlantic306 (
talk)
19:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Sandeep Chhillar moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Sandeep Chhillar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Procyon117 ( talk) 14:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sources links are already added in the article. Please look at the citation. Johnbt21 ( talk) 05:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... Hi, I am not able to fix this issue. Please help.
It is requested that the page history of Draft:Sandeep Chhillar be merged into the history of this page. This action must be performed by an administrator.
Consider placing
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give
Draft:Sandeep Chhillar a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into
Sandeep Chhillar. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Johnbt21 ( talk) 05:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC) on the talk page of the editor who performed the cut-and-paste move.
Please help. Thanks. Johnbt21 ( talk) 05:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I removed the {{
histmerge}} tag since I didn't see that there was any relevant history to merge. I also tagged the page for
notability because the current refs fail
WP:GNG, being all press releases, interviews, and brief mentions.
— jmcgnh
(talk)
(contribs)
06:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- That was why I moved it to draft the first time, because the two sources there were were not enough to establish notability in my opinion. Procyon117 ( talk) 12:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Sandeep Chhillar for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Chhillar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.