![]() | This is an
archive of past discussions for the period 2015. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 2010 | ← | Archive 2013 | Archive 2014 | Archive 2015 |
Thanks for your edits on all the Catholic Bishop articles, Joe! I have tried to create one for every bishop I find who does not have one, but they all need fleshing out. Good work! Dhpage ( talk) 00:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
The move instruction
{{db-move|Template:ArchbishopsofNY|This Redirect no longer needed as 'redirect-to' page ( Template:Archbishops of New York ) has been replaced by a Navbox template ( Template:Ordinaries of the Archdiocese of New York ) }}
which you inserted into page Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests at 14:38 on 27 February 2015, should have been inserted into page X, where you wanted to move Template:ArchbishopsofNY to X. Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 16:30, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello JoeHebda, thanks for adding information to many prelate and church-related articles. Just a quick note though, the last section header of an article should be "External links" or a reference header (or any previous header, if no ELs are listed). Following succession information, navboxes, categories, stub warnings, etc. at the bottom of the article generally don't have a separate header (they should have a descriptive title inside of them). See MOS:LAYOUT for some information about the background for this structure. Not a big issue, but I just wanted to explain my reverts of those header additions. Regards. GermanJoe ( talk) 10:06, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taylor County, Wisconsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wisconsin Central Railroad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:59, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Food Preferences in Older Adults/Seniors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scientific study. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
"I see that on the image licensing it states, Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3) Only used for the Diocese Wiki page. It needs Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license or similiar; so that it can be added to the Navbox Template: Roman Catholic Diocese of La Crosse and thereby appear on all of the Diocese-related article pages"
OK, How do I do that? I have a few more to update.
Thanks Roberto221 ( talk) 20:18, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Over the weekend I added more coat of arms but I didn't use the naming conventions. The product I used doesn't let me save them in .svg so if you can convert them, that would be of great help. They are:
The Santa Rose .jpg should read Santa Rosa, I attended St. Rose when I was a child, it stuck in my brain. Thanks.. Roberto221 ( talk) 00:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Please explain to me what it means to be an editor, and how do they get together to make decisions? Are editors paid by Wikipedia? Are logged-in contributors called "editors" or what's the difference? With regard to the article I contributed on History of the Catholic Church in Belize, I can see why the editors may want the title to correspond more directly with their categories, but I don't see why they need to add the term "Roman" within an article since it had occurred only once in the article (in a reference to the Roman authorities). I explain on the talk page /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Catholicism/Terminology why this is a sensitive issue in the Catholic church. By inserting the word "Roman" within the article the editors are injecting themselves into the discussion within the church and biasing the article in favor of those who don't want change (by slowing down the process toward renewal). Must Wikipedia carry on this way?jzsj 22:47, 15 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jzsj ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for showing me that in the Teahouse. SovalValtos ( talk) 20:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello JoeHebda, I have set the class for this article to C for now, but merely for technical reasons: projects with B-class checklists should have all B-criteria set to "yes", before the class parameter can be updated to B - that's why the template didn't display the B-class correctly. If you feel the article is ready for B-class, please check all criteria and update all criteria parameters and the class accordingly (I am not knowledgeable about that specific topic or I would have done it myself). A summary what is needed for B-class in WP:Germany can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Germany/Assessment#Quality_scale (it's very similar to most other projects). If you have additional questions, just let me know. Best regards. GermanJoe ( talk) 13:54, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your edits with one exception: I don't understand the logic of removing the heading "Historical periods" as a section heading for the historical periods (2,3,4 now) which it describes. Please explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jzsj ( talk • contribs) 11:03, 1 July 2015
I nominated this article for deletion. If you care, please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mid-volume transaction output. Kendall-K1 ( talk) 03:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to disturb you. There have benn scores of edits by User:艾德一世 to the above article. In my opinion, many of them are incorrect/unnecessary (OR maybe not, I'm no expert of this subject). Is there any chance you could take a look at them & check? Many thanks Denisarona ( talk) 12:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
In 12 hours, the Signpost is published for this week and is short on articles. I am hoping to throw together and article on tip of the day. Since you participate in the project, I would appreciate if you could answer these questions about the project as soon as you could.
Thanks, if you see this after the deadline for the signpost, dont fret. Tortle ( talk) 07:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tortle, below are my answers to the above questions. Note that for the numbered list to work, the lines must be kept together without a blank line in between, for example.
Provide informative and instructional help for Wikipedia contributors in a single tip, idea or shortcut format.
While we have no survey results or benchmarks to indicate direct linkage between TOTD views and resulting Wikipedia improvements, we can check the page information for some hard numbers.
We see that both the TOTD page and the Tips (by subject) page are being viewed on a daily basis.
Wikipedia:Tip_of_the_day has been viewed 4103 times in the last 30 days.
Wikipedia:Tip_of_the_day has been viewed 23330 times in the last 90 days.
Wikipedia:Tips (library) has been viewed 5522 times in the last 30 days.
Wikipedia:Tips (library) has been viewed 26036 times in the last 90 days.
A second consideration is the lack of controversy or negative feedback on these TOTD talk pages.
A new tip was added for The Wikipedia Adventure! (Tip schedule queue date: April 24).
Added cross wikilinks between the TOTD page and Tips library page.
In the Tips library, over 40 unsorted Tips were placed into subject categories.
On the Tips schedule queue of 366 days there are not 366 unique individual tips, so new tips to be added to the schedule queue as well as removal of duplicate tips.
To keep the Tip library in step with the scheduling queue, additional editors may help by reviewing the Tip library and performing cleanup.
Hi Joe, I noticed that your font userbox links to Calibri(typeface), which is a red link. Perhaps change it to link to Calibri? Paul2520 ( talk) 04:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Your work on the tips project looks good. Maybe like every day there should be like one tip for beginners, one tip for frequent editors, and like one tip for experts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackhat999 ( talk • contribs) 19:15, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Which of these might be the best to use?
JoeHebda ( talk) 17:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey! I noticed you are a Notre Dame alumnus, hence I wanted to invite you to join our project. Also, I know you're already an active member of the project, but I just wanted to tell you that I'm currently in the effort to re-boot the project and make it more productive than ever.
![]() | Hello, JoeHebda/Archive 2015! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Notre Dame, an outreach effort which aims to support development of Notre Dame related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants, check out our To Do list, and join the discussion on our talk page. Thanks!!! |
![]() |
I note your edits of my various articles on the enclos paroissial of Brittany and rather than keep clicking "thank you" I thought a general thank you was appropriate. Your efforts are much appreciated and the articles are improved. Hope you enjoyed them. Weglinde ( talk) 18:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I BOTFIGHTER I got your message on the talk page of teahouse I have visited shevgaon I can help you in that matter just I nedd some time till I collect more information on it. Thanks for asking. BOTFIGHTER ( talk) 15:57, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Thank you for the reminder! :)
I often don't complete the assessment since I hadn't really familiarized myself with the exact criteria and differences in regards to both importance and quality ranking. I was mainly focusing on just adding articles to their respective projects. WhisperToMe ( talk) 18:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)