|
Hello JoanPerezDias,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Duran Bros. Records for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
TonyBallioni ( talk) 23:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
The article Duran Bros. Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
16:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Regulo Caro, JoanPerezDias!
Wikipedia editor Scope creep just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please add additional sources. Reference 3 is broken.
To reply, leave a comment on Scope creep's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
scope_creep ( talk) 13:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duran Bros. Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duran Bros. Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni ( talk) 14:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
Duran Bros. Records. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a
bot about
this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please
report it.—
cyberbot I
Talk to my owner:Online
00:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Borja Luzuriaga Vázquez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable social media "celebrity". Claim to notability seems to be derived from subscriber total alone with minimal coverage towards GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
BigHaz -
Schreit mich an
23:07, 8 July 2017 (UTC)