![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited International Express, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Padang Besar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sam Sen railway station, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phaya Thai and Dusit.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I just wondered why you changed the adjacent stations to s-rail at Zhangjiakou railway station (opened in 1957)? Personally, I find them much easier to read when they are not in the infobox. Putting the templates in the infobox makes the text all squished up. NemesisAT ( talk) 00:17, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
I think you should put left terminus as Kwasa Damansara, as in Malaysia we follow Station 1 (left) to the last station. angys ( Talk Talk) 18:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi @ Magicman0361: where did you get that Vientiane–Thai railway station? Any evidence? Jjpachano ( talk) 11:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC) Hi, I get it from Google Earth: The extension and the Vientiane-Thai Railway Station at Nonvai Village, Xaysetha Distrikt, Vientiane Prefecture are under construction. magicman0361 ( talk) 13:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Ok, I'm just curious Jjpachano ( talk) 03:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be
blocked from editing. A source has already been shared on the article talk page noting the opposite of what you are inputting.
CMD (
talk)
02:06, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
Rsk6400 (
talk)
14:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simferopol railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perm.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 14:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Cha Eun-woo, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you. —
Paper9oll (
🔔 •
📝)
08:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Cha Eun-woo. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝) 08:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Shin Yeon-suh, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —
Paper9oll (
🔔 •
📝)
10:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Ju Jingyi, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please see
WP:DOB and
WP:BURDEN
Waxworker (
talk)
20:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring on Key (entertainer). I asked you to follow WP:BRD; you chose to ignore this, and reverted again without providing an explanation. Seek consensus on the talk page instead. Artemisia ( talk) 23:44, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at
Park Si-eun (entertainer), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use
your sandbox for that. Thank you. —
Paper9oll (
🔔 •
📝)
15:44, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Cha Eun-woo. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ⇒ Luminous Person (talk) 22:34, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Victory Liner, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Isabela and Tabuk.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! May I know why the network is removed from Kang Hyewon's web series list? ^^ Sulley721 ( talk) 00:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited JAM Liner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rizal.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Tiffany Young, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you. —
Paper9oll (
🔔 •
📝)
06:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in
Boten–Vientiane railway. There is a
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Line breaks should not be used to create pseudo-lists. See
MOS:NOBR.
XtraJovial (
talk •
contribs)
23:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)